Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

Just got a notice that my Photobucket bandwidth is running out.  So in case the pics suddenly stop being displayed you'll all know why.
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by freeboy »

you can directly load pc to forum at lower res no?
"Tanks forward"
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

ORIGINAL: freeboy

you can directly load pc to forum at lower res no?

Probably but I never tried. Always used Photobucket.
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by freeboy »

I just direct dump intothe forum, easy..
let me know if you have any ?'s
tell your wife happy Bday!
enjoy the time off
 
"Tanks forward"
stevekten
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by stevekten »

ORIGINAL: Smirfy
suggest you read some books on the length of front divsions/korps/armys covered, especially during the 42 offensive in the south. It will suprise you and make these numbers more realistic.

Think you are kinda missing the point sure administrative distances were stretched that did not mean they were optimum especially in the 42 offensive.

Trying to figure what you problem with the ranges are then, you said "If thats the case it seems kinda just a bit much".

Smirfy
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:24 pm

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Smirfy »

Trying to figure what you problem with the ranges are then, you said "If thats the case it seems kinda just a bit much".

Well if a Corps HQ is 90 miles away from it parent Army HQ one would imagine it would be less effective relative to a Corps HQ 50 miles distant. Likewise one would imagine a Division would benefit being 20 miles away from a Corps headquarters rather than say 60 miles. If Im understanding things correctly units can be directly attached to higher headquarters and bypass corps command subject to penalty if too many avail themselves. HQ's it seems are not dependant on distance between themselves and a higher HQ to function efficently. I would worry that the devlopers go to the great length of producing a chain of command and OOB and it then becomes subject to exploit (always a pitfall in computer games) or a feature with little impact.
User avatar
PyleDriver
Posts: 5906
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:38 pm
Location: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by PyleDriver »

Well the big thing that happens by having them in higher command is you dont get any support in combat (over 5 hexs)...It really helps in combat results to have those support units jump in...
Jon Pyle
AWD Beta tester
WBTS Alpha tester
WitE Alpha tester
WitW Alpha tester
WitE2 Alpha tester
ComradeP
Posts: 6992
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:11 pm

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by ComradeP »

So, basically, the participation of support units attached to HQ's is abstracted in the sense that, as long as HQ's are in range, the support units attached to it support the combat by "moving" to the hex or "moving" within range (as far as the engine is concerned), whilst they actually stay in the HQ hex?
SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer
User avatar
PyleDriver
Posts: 5906
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:38 pm
Location: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by PyleDriver »

Yes, so having those battilions attached to a HQ, the "leaders numbers" (how good he is) add in the die roll to press them into the battle, sweet huh...
Jon Pyle
AWD Beta tester
WBTS Alpha tester
WitE Alpha tester
WitW Alpha tester
WitE2 Alpha tester
User avatar
Zovs
Posts: 9218
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:02 pm
Location: United States

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Zovs »

HQ's it seems are not dependant on distance between themselves and a higher HQ to function efficently. I would worry that the devlopers go to the great length of producing a chain of command and OOB and it then becomes subject to exploit (always a pitfall in computer games) or a feature with little impact.

This is not true, each HQ has to be in command range of a higher HQ. Generally, divisions & brigades report to Corps HQ and then Corps HQ report to Armies and Armies report to Army Groups and then the Groups report to OKH for the Germans. For the Soviets brigades, divisions and corps report to Corps HQ (early war) or Armies, Armies report to Fronts and Fronts report to Stavka.

Each higher HQ has a command range that increases or decreases as you navigate the food chain. The 5 hex radius to receive sub-support units is for combat only, to assign sub-support units directly this is not the case.
Image
Beta Tester for: War in the East 1 & 2, WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific, Valor & Victory, Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm, Computer War In Europe 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator
Tester for WDS games
User avatar
PyleDriver
Posts: 5906
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:38 pm
Location: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by PyleDriver »

Damn I love this game...And were only Alpha...We have alot of smart guys join the bunch...Lee "Elmo" just got in say 6 months ago he loves it, as we all doooooo...This game is to much fun, I've been testing for 21 months, and it was ugly then...lol...
Jon Pyle
AWD Beta tester
WBTS Alpha tester
WitE Alpha tester
WitW Alpha tester
WitE2 Alpha tester
User avatar
Northern Star
Posts: 1853
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:53 pm

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Northern Star »

I've been testing since December 2008 and I love this game too...
War in the East alpha tester

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPV9JWWtOQ0
User avatar
Great_Ajax
Posts: 4924
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: Oklahoma, USA

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Great_Ajax »

Actually, Lee got here in December and we played a couple of Typhoon games PBEM.

Trey
ORIGINAL: PyleDriver

Damn I love this game...And were only Alpha...We have alot of smart guys join the bunch...Lee "Elmo" just got in say 6 months ago he loves it, as we all doooooo...This game is to much fun, I've been testing for 21 months, and it was ugly then...lol...
"You want mercy!? I'm chaotic neutral!"

WiTE Scenario Designer
WitW Scenario/Data Team Lead
WitE 2.0 Scenario Designer
User avatar
Sabre21
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 8:00 am
Location: on a mountain in Idaho

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Sabre21 »

ORIGINAL: el hefe

Actually, Lee got here in December and we played a couple of Typhoon games PBEM.

Trey
ORIGINAL: PyleDriver

Damn I love this game...And were only Alpha...We have alot of smart guys join the bunch...Lee "Elmo" just got in say 6 months ago he loves it, as we all doooooo...This game is to much fun, I've been testing for 21 months, and it was ugly then...lol...
Yea..I remember your first few pbem's too Trey <snicker> [:'(]
Image
Ron
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 2:46 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Ron »

ORIGINAL: Smirfy

Well if a Corps HQ is 90 miles away from it parent Army HQ one would imagine it would be less effective relative to a Corps HQ 50 miles distant. Likewise one would imagine a Division would benefit being 20 miles away from a Corps headquarters rather than say 60 miles.


Apparently you've never been exposed to any bureaucratic organization, military or otherwise, where contrary to perceived logic, the efficiency of any group decreases at an exponential rate the closer it gets to higher command. [:)]
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

Losses and OOB through turn 28.&nbsp; Will post the rest of the bad news later after assessing the damage and getting my daughter from pre-school.

Image

Image

Image
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
User avatar
Sabre21
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 8:00 am
Location: on a mountain in Idaho

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Sabre21 »

ORIGINAL: Ron

ORIGINAL: Smirfy

Well if a Corps HQ is 90 miles away from it parent Army HQ one would imagine it would be less effective relative to a Corps HQ 50 miles distant. Likewise one would imagine a Division would benefit being 20 miles away from a Corps headquarters rather than say 60 miles.


Apparently you've never been exposed to any bureaucratic organization, military or otherwise, where contrary to perceived logic, the efficiency of any group decreases at an exponential rate the closer it gets to higher command. [:)]

Very well said and oh how true...lol.
Image
User avatar
Great_Ajax
Posts: 4924
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: Oklahoma, USA

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by Great_Ajax »

Good times, Andy. Everything I learned in this game, I learned from you ;) LOL. My favorite time was when I broke your line at Velikye Luki. That was funny!

Trey
ORIGINAL: Sabre21

ORIGINAL: el hefe

Actually, Lee got here in December and we played a couple of Typhoon games PBEM.

Trey
ORIGINAL: PyleDriver

Damn I love this game...And were only Alpha...We have alot of smart guys join the bunch...Lee "Elmo" just got in say 6 months ago he loves it, as we all doooooo...This game is to much fun, I've been testing for 21 months, and it was ugly then...lol...
Yea..I remember your first few pbem's too Trey <snicker> [:'(]
"You want mercy!? I'm chaotic neutral!"

WiTE Scenario Designer
WitW Scenario/Data Team Lead
WitE 2.0 Scenario Designer
User avatar
PyleDriver
Posts: 5906
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:38 pm
Location: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by PyleDriver »

Well I thought lee was here 4 months, but hell, throw him a couple of months...lol...Btw Andy the cold really doesnt bother me...Just like the warm better...
Jon Pyle
AWD Beta tester
WBTS Alpha tester
WitE Alpha tester
WitW Alpha tester
WitE2 Alpha tester
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

Post by elmo3 »

ORIGINAL: Ron

Apparently you've never been exposed to any bureaucratic organization, military or otherwise, where contrary to perceived logic, the efficiency of any group decreases at an exponential rate the closer it gets to higher command. [:)]

I checked on this and just want to clarify the command range situation. There is no HQ to HQ range. All combat units and airbases must be within 5 of their parent HQ for supplies and for getting support units assisting in combat. HQ's do not need to be within 5. This is confirmed with Gary. The ranges:

5 corps
15 Army
45 Army group

are the range that the unit's higher HQ must be within to provide excess support elements from that HQ to assist if there is a shortage of support elements in the unit. As long as they are within range, the excess support flows down the chain of command to the combat units that may need them.
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”