P51-B What gives

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

P51-B What gives

Post by crsutton »

It is 4-44 and I am producing about 100 a month. Yet I see no reinforcment air groups that have these planes and no exsisting air group that can upgrade to them. Am I missing something?

Perhaps we are giving them all to the Russians. Of course, they can have some of the 1,293,459 boomerangs that I now have on hand.....

This is a stock game.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by Terminus »

This is a known bug. Get started on producing the -D instead, you'll never get a -B unit.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4138
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by wernerpruckner »

you can downgrade the P-51D units later [:D]
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by crsutton »

Oh well, they are no better than the P38-J in game terms anyways.
 
I am trading them off to the Russians for vodka.   Seems like a fair exchange.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
NormS3
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:31 pm
Location: Wild and Wonderful WV, just don't drink the water
Contact:

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by NormS3 »

You can trade them for vodka?

What patch is that under?
User avatar
Japan
Posts: 754
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 1:45 pm
Location: Heaven on Earth (Scandinavia of course)

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by Japan »

ORIGINAL: Norm3

You can trade them for vodka?

What patch is that under?



na, the Soviets got fairly few planes and materials in general anyways, of course "thay got alot" but still pritty few compared to what thay actualy produced themselfs. I think no one dissagrees that the Soviets won the war, and that the Allied helped with denying Germany Fuel Production...

I doubdt thay are willing to trade you planes for Vodka.. Better you give them the planes for free.
AAR VIDEO
THE FIRST YEAR + THE SECOND YEAR
tm.asp?m=2133035&mpage=1&key=&
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by Terminus »

Wow... You're really begging to be flamed to a cinder with that remark...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Charbroiled
Posts: 1181
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:50 pm
Location: Oregon

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by Charbroiled »

ORIGINAL: Japan
...I think no one dissagrees that the Soviets won the war, and that the Allied helped with denying Germany Fuel Production...

Ummmm...I do!!
"When I said I would run, I meant 'away' ". - Orange
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: Charbroiled

ORIGINAL: Japan
...I think no one dissagrees that the Soviets won the war, and that the Allied helped with denying Germany Fuel Production...

Ummmm...I do!!


As would every male in my family alive at that time.
Image

User avatar
mlees
Posts: 2263
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 6:14 am
Location: San Diego

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by mlees »

ORIGINAL: Japan

na, the Soviets got fairly few planes and materials in general anyways, of course "thay got alot" but still pritty few compared to what thay actualy produced themselfs. I think no one dissagrees that the Soviets won the war, and that the Allied helped with denying Germany Fuel Production...

I doubdt thay are willing to trade you planes for Vodka.. Better you give them the planes for free.

Wiki states that 19% of all military aircraft at war's end was of U.S. manufacture.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend_lease
For example, the USSR was highly dependent on trains, yet the desperate need to produce weapons meant that only about 92 locomotives were produced in the USSR during the entire war. In this context, the supply of 1,981 US locomotives can be better understood. Likewise, the Soviet air force was enhanced by 18,700 aircraft, which amounted to about 14% of Soviet aircraft production (19% for military aircraft).

Although most Red Army tank units were equipped with Soviet-built tanks, their logistical support was provided by hundreds of thousands of US-made trucks. Indeed by 1945 nearly two-thirds of the truck strength of the Red Army was U.S.-built. Trucks such as the Dodge ¾ ton and Studebaker 2.5 ton, were easily the best trucks available in their class on either side on the Eastern Front. US supplies of telephone cable, aluminium, canned rations and fur boots were also critical, the latter providing a crucial advantage in the winter defence of Moscow.

19% sounds fairly significant to me... not "fairly few". [;)]
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: m10bob

ORIGINAL: Charbroiled

ORIGINAL: Japan
...I think no one dissagrees that the Soviets won the war, and that the Allied helped with denying Germany Fuel Production...

Ummmm...I do!!


As would every male in my family alive at that time.

I'd almost call "Japan's" post a troll comment, but I don't think Japan understands just what was wrong with it... Maybe we should just pardon him his ignorance...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by castor troy »

while the Soviet Army seems to have won the war, it was the US industry that really won it...
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by Shark7 »

And those 5000 ships filled with British, Canadian, US, Australian, Free French, Polish, Belgian, Dutch, Scotish, Irish and New Zealander troops that crossed the English channel in the summer of 1944 probably had a role in the victory in Europe as well.

I apologize if I have left out any allied nations that fought in Europe, it was not intentional its just not my main area of study.
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: Shark7

And those 5000 ships filled with British, Canadian, US, Australian, Free French, Polish, Belgian, Dutch, Scotish, Irish and New Zealander troops that crossed the English channel in the summer of 1944 probably had a role in the victory in Europe as well.

I apologize if I have left out any allied nations that fought in Europe, it was not intentional its just not my main area of study.


Ummmm........and of course, they were using the P51-B. Unlike me.[:-]
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
bradfordkay
Posts: 8568
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by bradfordkay »

I wish that I had such numbers of the P51B in my CHS game... I have several squadrons which upgrade to the Mustang, just not enough planes for them!
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7669
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by wdolson »

There was an article about Lend Lease to the Russians in a recent edition of World War II magazine.  The Soviets played down Lend Lease's impact on their war effort after the war and most Lend Lease equipment was replaced with Soviet made soon after the war (if it was replaced at all).  Now that westerners have access to Soviet archives, the truth is somewhat different. 

The Soviets were pretty much self sufficient in some areas like tank production, but the US provided a lot more equipment than they were willing to admit after the war.  I forget the exact numbers, but they are in the article.

Bill
SCW Development Team
Kingfisher
Posts: 234
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:25 am

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by Kingfisher »

ORIGINAL: Shark7

And those 5000 ships filled with British, Canadian, US, Australian, Free French, Polish, Belgian, Dutch, Scotish, Irish and New Zealander troops that crossed the English channel in the summer of 1944 probably had a role in the victory in Europe as well.

I apologize if I have left out any allied nations that fought in Europe, it was not intentional its just not my main area of study.

You didn't leave any out, you just added a few too many [;)]

By the summer of '44 all of Australia's forces had returned home to fight in the PTO (actually by fall of '42) and the New Zealand troops were fighting in Italy.
"splendid was their tactic of diving upon our force from the direction of the sun, taking advantage of intermittent clouds"

-Captain Takahisa Amagai, KAGA, June 4th 1942
juliet7bravo
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 8:00 am

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by juliet7bravo »

Let's not forget the thousands of high velocity gun tubes (and hundreds of thousands troops manning them) shooting at US/Brit bombers instead of Russian tanks. Or the thousands of sorties by fighters flying bomber intercept missions instead of supplying air superiority on the Eastern Front.

When things were really ugly, Britain/USA kept Russia alive sending material they desperately needed themselves at the time.
User avatar
Gem35
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by Gem35 »

ORIGINAL: Terminus
ORIGINAL: m10bob

ORIGINAL: Charbroiled




Ummmm...I do!!


As would every male in my family alive at that time.

I'd almost call "Japan's" post a troll comment, but I don't think Japan understands just what was wrong with it... Maybe we should just pardon him his ignorance...
Yes, but after the germans bombed pearl it was clear how we helped the russians by consuming most of the world's gasoline.[8D]
It doesn't make any sense, Admiral. Were we better than the Japanese or just luckier?

[center]Image[/center]
[center]Banner By Feurer Krieg[/center]
User avatar
TOMLABEL
Posts: 4473
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 7:50 pm
Location: Alabama - ROLL TIDE!!!!!

RE: P51-B What gives

Post by TOMLABEL »

ORIGINAL: Gem35

ORIGINAL: Terminus
ORIGINAL: m10bob





As would every male in my family alive at that time.

I'd almost call "Japan's" post a troll comment, but I don't think Japan understands just what was wrong with it... Maybe we should just pardon him his ignorance...
Yes, but after the germans bombed pearl it was clear how we helped the russians by consuming most of the world's gasoline.[8D]


Exactly, Gem. Just like we did 9-11.

TOMLABEL
Image
Art by the Rogue-USMC

WITP Admiral's Edition: Ship & Sub Art/Base Unit Art/Map Icon Art

"If destruction be our lot - it will come from within"...Abraham Lincoln
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”