For those who have tried them both

Based on Slitherine’s popular tabletop wargaming system by the same name, Field of Glory now comes to the PC in a faithful adaptation of this acclaimed miniatures wargame! Without the calculations and measurements required for a tabletop game of Field of Glory, the PC version accurately represents Ancient and Medieval combat where you make the important and fun decisions on the battlefield. This forum also supports the Rise of Rome, Storm of Arrows and Immortal Fire expansions to Field of Glory.
Post Reply
FM WarB
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:40 pm

For those who have tried them both

Post by FM WarB »

Which do you prefer, FoG or HPS' Ancient War series?
Rosseau
Posts: 2947
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:20 am

RE: For those who have tried them both

Post by Rosseau »

Give me your address, and I'll mail you Gallic Wars. Just can't play it, and I tried. All the details are there, but the interface is cumbersome and very old school. Maybe I'm just getting lazy in my old age. But I'd rather play FoG and expansions in the time I have left! Especially with their MP server.

I love HPS, but there's no contest. I have Alexandrian Wars, too. Their new France 1914 game is such a labor of love. But again, for me, so slow and cumbersome as to be unplayable.

Best to you!
FM WarB
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:40 pm

RE: For those who have tried them both

Post by FM WarB »

I usually prefer Igo Ugo to WEGO, so thats a vote for FoG. It does seem that the various updates to AW have addressed some issues that apply to FoG, though.

How do the grahics compare? Do the screenshots availabel not do FoG justice?

I'm guessing AW would be better for Allisea than FoG.
Rosseau
Posts: 2947
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:20 am

RE: For those who have tried them both

Post by Rosseau »

Counters (better) or very fuzzy figures for HPS, and miniatures style for FoG. FoG looks better than shown in the screen shots. Also, the editor in FoG is much easier to use and you can change all the stats on each unit. Never even played MP until FoG. Some pretty knowledgeable users at Slitherine forum.

But seriously, if you want Gallic Wars, send me an email. I want to give away some of this stuff.
TheGrayMouser
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:25 pm

RE: For those who have tried them both

Post by TheGrayMouser »

ORIGINAL: rosseau

Give me your address, and I'll mail you Gallic Wars. Just can't play it, and I tried. All the details are there, but the interface is cumbersome and very old school. Maybe I'm just getting lazy in my old age. But I'd rather play FoG and expansions in the time I have left! Especially with their MP server.

I love HPS, but there's no contest. I have Alexandrian Wars, too. Their new France 1914 game is such a labor of love. But again, for me, so slow and cumbersome as to be unplayable.

Best to you!

I own Punic wars, its one of those games that I WANT to love, but just cant dive in for some reason... Like you said all the detail and depth is there... i tend to think part of the problem, at least for me, is the learning curve coupled with the lack of feedback to what you are doing and why its wrong;). The AI slaps me around even in the shorter scenarios and i just cant figure out why my skirmishers end up routed or disordered after a turn of skirmishing an equal # of AI skirmishers etc.... Another issue is (as is all JT games) the AI takes ridiculously long turns for some of the larger battles
(30plus minutes sometimes!) Maybe i am losing patience the older I get, I dunno. Somdday i will sit down and take the time to learn these games...
Rosseau
Posts: 2947
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:20 am

RE: For those who have tried them both

Post by Rosseau »

To be accurate, I just booted up Alexandrian wars, and the graphic figures are actually pretty good. There's just lots of them, so you've got to be a micro manager to enjoy the game.

Heck, for $30 at the Online Gaming Store you could do worse. But buy Alex or the newest one. They have campaign options.
User avatar
IainMcNeil
Posts: 2784
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:01 am
Location: London
Contact:

RE: For those who have tried them both

Post by IainMcNeil »

FoG is half price for a limited time so grab it while you can!
Iain McNeil
Director
Matrix Games
FM WarB
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:40 pm

RE: For those who have tried them both

Post by FM WarB »

Talk about temptations!
FM WarB
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:40 pm

RE: For those who have tried them both

Post by FM WarB »

ORIGINAL: rosseau

To be accurate, I just booted up Alexandrian wars, and the graphic figures are actually pretty good. There's just lots of them, so you've got to be a micro manager to enjoy the game.

Heck, for $30 at the Online Gaming Store you could do worse. But buy Alex or the newest one. They have campaign options.
To be accurate, I just booted up Alexandrian wars, and the graphic figures are actually pretty good. There's just lots of them, so you've got to be a micro manager to enjoy the game.

Heck, for $30 at the Online Gaming Store you could do worse. But buy Alex or the newest one. They have campaign options.

It appears all games in the AW series have been patched up to the latest standard. Newer group movement may cut micromangement. There definitely seems to be a more active FoG player base. Still on the fence.
User avatar
Titanwarrior89
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 4:07 pm
Location: arkansas
Contact:

RE: For those who have tried them both

Post by Titanwarrior89 »

Both are great systems......But FOG got me into buying and playing FOG miniatures.  I am already into civil war miniatures.[:)]
"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory Series”