Wild Life

Moderator: Vic

Post Reply
User avatar
siRkid
Posts: 4177
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Orland FL

Wild Life

Post by siRkid »

Wild life should not control territory or affect borders. Here is what I would like to see.
1. A nest/den that generates new units. Once the nest is destroyed, it no longer generates.
2. The units roam about but stay with in a given distance of home.
3. The units have ZOC that can interrupt supply, block roads, etc.
4. If a unit comes in contact with a Free town, it stays next to it and starts killing off the population.
The Free town would then ask for help and improve relations if you kill the beast.
5. Limit the number of units that a nest can support at one time.
Former War in the Pacific Test Team Manager and Beta Tester for War in the East.

Image
zgrssd
Posts: 5101
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:02 pm

RE: Wild Life

Post by zgrssd »

That would require a completely new System of things to track. Particulary the border thing. The spawner itself sounds doable. Indeed might make it work more like a normal Minor with a city.

I feel like the game has complicated enough rules, without needing exceptions like this. The one thing causing the most headahce is never the rules - it is the eceptions.
User avatar
siRkid
Posts: 4177
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Orland FL

RE: Wild Life

Post by siRkid »

I can understand not making it more complicated but what got me thinking about it in the first place was wild life changing my boarders.
Former War in the Pacific Test Team Manager and Beta Tester for War in the East.

Image
zgrssd
Posts: 5101
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:02 pm

RE: Wild Life

Post by zgrssd »

ORIGINAL: siRkid

I can understand not making it more complicated but what got me thinking about it in the first place was wild life changing my boarders.
The wildlife changing your borders is not different from a minor or major at war doing the same thing:
It is a area that is not save for non-military personel.
Where stuff might want to kill and/or eat them. Once your troops secured the area, they know it is save again.
User avatar
Tchey
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 5:02 am
Contact:

RE: Wild Life

Post by Tchey »

I too think wildlife should not change border, but only freely roam and attack as they like.
* Jeux1d100 ? Le blog Jeux1d100.net sur les jeux indécents et Linux, et la chaîne YouTube *
ramnblam
Posts: 216
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2020 9:40 am
Location: Australia

RE: Wild Life

Post by ramnblam »

I don't like any of these suggestions. Animals should be a real threat to the player not just a minor annoyance that you can cheese.
User avatar
Tchey
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 5:02 am
Contact:

RE: Wild Life

Post by Tchey »

My world has 7m long carni-squid, they are a giant threat, but still, i don’t see a reason they should be competitors in diplomatic borders.
* Jeux1d100 ? Le blog Jeux1d100.net sur les jeux indécents et Linux, et la chaîne YouTube *
zgrssd
Posts: 5101
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:02 pm

RE: Wild Life

Post by zgrssd »

I really like the idea of a spawner/nest/whatever you want to call it. Something we can destroy. Soemthing that might work like a city.
I mean, it worked in Age of Wonders Planetfall, so why not here?

But I do not like this idea that boils down to "They should not have borders, but they should act as if they had borders". We definitely need a way to spam some small units with weak combat potential, just to allow us pushing back/securing the borders. But not some major rework like this.
Post Reply

Return to “Suggestions and Feedback”