US lamenting loss when no loss occurs....

Strategic Command WWII: War in the Pacific is a turn-based strategy game. It offers a comprehensive experience of the Pacific Theater, challenging you to achieve victory in one of history's greatest conflicts.
Post Reply
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7430
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

US lamenting loss when no loss occurs....

Post by HansBolter »

So I placed a defender in Davao and when Manila fell the government was moved to Davao.

I was surprised by this because Davao is labeled an Alternate Industrial not an Alternate Capital.

MacArthur did not appear in OZ, so the game got that part right.

However, the message that the US laments the loss of the Philippines did fire incorrectly as the Philippines has not been lost.

Shouldn't the triggering of that message be tied to the actual fall of the Philippines and not just to the fall of Manila?

I also discovered that Soerabaja is an alternate capital, although not labeled as such.
Hans

User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7430
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

Re: US lamenting loss when no loss occurs....

Post by HansBolter »

Bill.....are you here?

Listening to the crickets on this one........
Hans

User avatar
BillRunacre
Posts: 6581
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:57 pm
Contact:

Re: US lamenting loss when no loss occurs....

Post by BillRunacre »

Correct, it is the loss of Manila alone that has triggered the National Morale script. I will change that.

Just to clarify:

The wording Alternate/Industrial signifies that Davao is an Industrial Center, and also that if the original capital falls, it will be an Alternative Capital.

Soerabaja is not an Alternative Capital, it is however (as marked) a Secondary Supply Center).
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7430
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

Re: US lamenting loss when no loss occurs....

Post by HansBolter »

Does the DEI have an alternate capital? Did I just misremember what city it is?
Hans

User avatar
Robert24
Posts: 302
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 2:17 am

Re: US lamenting loss when no loss occurs....

Post by Robert24 »

No alternate capitals, just Batavia.
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7430
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

Re: US lamenting loss when no loss occurs....

Post by HansBolter »

Sorry guys,

OLD Syndrome kicking in again.

I keep forgetting I jumped right into modding this game practically out of the starting gate and turned Soerabaja into an alternate capital.

Seems anathema to me that the Nips gain control of the vast area of the DEI in a single week by attacking a single objective. They actually had to invade almost every port in the DEI and kick the defenders out in order to gain control.
I'm considering adding Palembang, Balikpapan, Makassar, Kendari and Ambon to the Alternate Capital list to force the issue. That would, of course require giving the Japanese the additional invasion forces to go after these objectives.

The dearth of units in this game severely reduces the desirability. I've gotta download that MegaPacific scenario and check it out.
Attachments
DEI.jpg
DEI.jpg (653.7 KiB) Viewed 8 times
Hans

Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command WWII: War in the Pacific”