As far as I can tell...

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
TheElf
Posts: 2800
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Pax River, MD

As far as I can tell...

Post by TheElf »

...the B-17G never saw service in the Pacific. We at the CHS are finishing things up. Adding some aircraft, and removing some others.

All my research indicates the B-17G never saw widespread service in the PTO (along with the B-26G). Anyone have any data to support or contest this?
IN PERPETUUM SINGULARIS SEDES

Image
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: As far as I can tell...

Post by Terminus »

No concrete data, no. But I've always thought that the B-17F was the last variant to see widespread service in the PTO, before everything became B-24 and then B-29...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
TheElf
Posts: 2800
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 1:46 am
Location: Pax River, MD

RE: As far as I can tell...

Post by TheElf »

B-17F was the ast variant according to my sources. Makes the B-17G a wasted slot in all stock and Mod games. Same with B-26G.
IN PERPETUUM SINGULARIS SEDES

Image
Halsey
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

RE: As far as I can tell...

Post by Halsey »

It's not wasted if you use PDU's.[;)]

The B-26G is in the same boat also.
User avatar
Herrbear
Posts: 883
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:17 pm
Location: Glendora, CA

RE: As far as I can tell...

Post by Herrbear »

ORIGINAL: TheElf

...the B-17G never saw service in the Pacific. We at the CHS are finishing things up. Adding some aircraft, and removing some others.

All my research indicates the B-17G never saw widespread service in the PTO (along with the B-26G). Anyone have any data to support or contest this?

I agree. All my sources back that up. The B-17G and the B-26G never served in the PTO.
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4082
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: As far as I can tell...

Post by Andrew Brown »

When I added the ex-ETO bombardment gtoups that were slated for ops in the Pacific to CHS, 17 of the 40 or so bombardment groups are equipped with the B-17G. The data for these groups (numbers, aircraft and arrival dates) were provide to me by someone else ("Blackhorse") so I cannot directly vouch for their accuracy. However if the B-17G was used in the ETO then the data makes sense to me.

Given this, removing the B-17G would also depend on whether, and how accurately, we model the use of the ex-ETO bombardment groups in 1945.

Also, if this use of the B-17G in the Pacific is the only one, then maybe it should have a later arrival date. However I am no expert on aircraft data.

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
Kapten Q
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:03 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

RE: As far as I can tell...

Post by Kapten Q »

ORIGINAL: Halsey

It's not wasted if you use PDU's.[;)]

The B-26G is in the same boat also.

 
I never managed to uppgrade anything into B-17G or B-26G using PDU. Am I missing something?
 
Q
Halsey
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

RE: As far as I can tell...

Post by Halsey »

Check the R+D date for those models.
 
Mod scenarios, not stock ones.
User avatar
2Stepper
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 11:16 pm
Location: North Burbs of Omaha
Contact:

RE: As far as I can tell...

Post by 2Stepper »

Since 90% of the B17G went to Europe to fight the Germans the only logical way I could see maybe 1 or 2 groups getting into the PTO is "after" November 1945 when they would theoretically shift more firepower to contend with Japan.

The game does allow for continuations into March of 1946 which is 6 months longer then history.  Wouldn't it track to see a group or two?  Especially after the ETO having been quiet for nearly a year?  The primary bombers would still be B24's and B29s at that point.  I think the numbers would have been small either way.  I have no numbers to back up the contention here, it just logically makes sense what with the games ability to run "long" after its historical end.  That make sense?[8D]
Image
"Send in the Infantry. Tanks cost money... the dead cost nothing..." :)
Halsey
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

RE: As far as I can tell...

Post by Halsey »

Makes sense.
The CHS group added quite a few Europe based planes to their mod.
Lancaster being the main one.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”