Page 2 of 5

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:29 pm
by Josh
Grass delays, hehehehe.
 
/chuckles
 
(thanks Steely, going to check it out)

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:36 pm
by Steely Glint
ORIGINAL: diablo1

You're heard of rain delays? Well this game is being delayed because of GRASS. lmao

I'd bet you that lots of games have been delayed by grass. :)

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 2:15 pm
by Yoozername
Maybe they should just release the update with snow-only scenarios. 

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:17 pm
by RocketMan
ORIGINAL: Steely Glint

ORIGINAL: diablo1

You're heard of rain delays? Well this game is being delayed because of GRASS. lmao

I'd bet you that lots of games have been delayed by grass. :)

It's like watching grass grow [:D]

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:37 pm
by Mad Russian
Actually it's exactly like watching grass grow!

I've got some 30+ scenarios that have had grass growing in them now. They tell me that it's about mature and time for the first cutting. Some of the fields have already been cut and there are haystacks in them already.

1st Quarter of 2011 include April? Because that's when Erik said he thought it would be finished with the manual updates, etc. for release.

Or did you guys not see that quote from him?

Good Hunting.

MR

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:49 pm
by tide1527
Q1 probably will not happen but I would not be surprised if we make an April release.

Yup That's what E.R. said [;)] I like haystacks in the fields. It gives me the taste of victory in the Ukraine [:D]

I have been playing COH Storm of Steel. Good little game also.

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:45 pm
by Yoozername
I like Cowflops

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:45 pm
by Mad Russian
ORIGINAL: Yoozername

I like Cowflops

I'm sure you do. [:D]

Good Hunting.

MR

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:51 pm
by rickier65

the testers recieved a new build last night. this build didn't add any features, just fixed a few things the testers had found, and updated some of the data.

Thanks
rick

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:44 pm
by Yoozername
ORIGINAL: Mad Russian
ORIGINAL: Yoozername

I like Cowflops

I'm sure you do. [:D]

Good Hunting.

MR

I knew this guy that ate too much grass, he sensed a movement, but all that came out was a KV-2 turret.

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:40 am
by Mad Russian
Ah, good for him!

I'm sure he's sitting right by the fellow having the BS StuG movement....what do you think?

Good Hunting.

MR

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:35 am
by Yoozername
I think the BS StuG thread has more posts than your 'Wood vs Mud Rusky' AAR has views!

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:52 am
by Mobius
ORIGINAL: Yoozername

I think the BS StuG thread has more posts than your 'Wood vs Mud Rusky' AAR has views!
That's mainly because it didn't have people insulting each other.

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:28 am
by Yoozername
Perhaps.  But the 'Elvis' AAR had 100+K views at BF.  Take that for what it's worth.  I see it as a genuine interest in the wargaming community for WWII product. 
 
I think Mad Russian needs to post here in a positive manner and perhaps curtail his extracurricular activities at gamesquat which showcases his insulting manner.  He seems to be more involved in putting down a wargame he has not played than promoting a wargame he has been involved with.  Perhaps that is his choice.  But for a forum that is on the brink of releasing a major upgrade to a product; I would say its very dead around here.
 
I am hoping the demo is better than the AAR that was posted here.  I still get that 'plain-burger' feeling from reading it. 

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:53 am
by Mobius
ORIGINAL: Yoozername
But for a forum that is on the brink of releasing a major upgrade to a product; I would say its very dead around here.
Admittedly we didn't throw a parade because we have printed text in the game.

Nor run up a flag because we have options for bogging and infantry fatigue. We haven't discussed the SOP options and their ramifications.

This game has had relative sighting since its inception but only now on some forums that is being lauded as cutting-edge of a new age in tactical wargaming.

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:59 am
by Mad Russian
ORIGINAL: Yoozername

Perhaps.  But the 'Elvis' AAR had 100+K views at BF.  Take that for what it's worth.  I see it as a genuine interest in the wargaming community for WWII product. 

I think Mad Russian needs to post here in a positive manner and perhaps curtail his extracurricular activities at gamesquat which showcases his insulting manner.  He seems to be more involved in putting down a wargame he has not played than promoting a wargame he has been involved with.  Perhaps that is his choice.  But for a forum that is on the brink of releasing a major upgrade to a product; I would say its very dead around here.

I am hoping the demo is better than the AAR that was posted here.  I still get that 'plain-burger' feeling from reading it. 

I would expect the AAR's for CMBN to get a lot of attention. They haven't shown much of their game to the world yet. They are already taking pre-orders for the game. Gamers want to know as much about the game as they can. We've been showing everything there is about PCO for months now. Gamers pretty much know if they want to buy it or not. They're just waiting for us to release it. Frankly, so am I. Then you and I can have some informed discussions about real issues.

Wasn't it you that said, in this forum, not to worry about what I do in other forums? Funny how that only applies to you. You were the one with an attitude with my not agreeing with every word out of your mouth at Game Squad. Then you brought that dispute here when you came. I know I'm not a genius, I would hope I'm not completely stupid either. It all depends on your own personal POV which end of that scale I fall on. I think I'm pretty much in the middle but do a lot of reading and studying to improve my understanding of the events we discuss here. At least enough to give an intelligent comment once in awhile.

I stand by what I've said and written about CMBN. Both at Game Squad and other sites. I'm going to wait and see what it looks like before I make my mind up whether or not I'll buy it.

On the other hand I don't go to the BFC boards and rag them about the game.

I know that you're the genius here, you've told us all multiple times. There is no reason to ever dispute any of your lecture points, you never discuss with anyone only give lectures, so I'm good with all of your opinions.

Consider this in all of your infinite wisdom, what you bring is what you get. Be nice and get nice back. Go on the attack and well....you're the genius, I'm sure you can figure that all out much better than the rest of us.

These forums are for the most part at least respectful. MOST posters here don't give out personal insults and respect that others may have a different view than we ourselves do.

As to the view count of your thread that just proves the drawing ability a true genius can give a thread. If I had been more adept at talking about the possibilities of having my Panthers with concrete armour I could have probably rivaled your view count but alas, not to be this time around. I'm okay with it though because I'm still reading all you posts and learning. I'm also signed up for the next Dale Carnegie course on How To Make Wargame Friends And Get On Development Teams. I'm sure that will help both my attitude and my view counts.



Good Hunting.

MR

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:03 pm
by Mad Russian
ORIGINAL: Mobius

ORIGINAL: Yoozername

I think the BS StuG thread has more posts than your 'Wood vs Mud Rusky' AAR has views!
That's mainly because it didn't have people insulting each other.

It didn't have a KV-2 in it either...[:(]


Good Hunting.

MR

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:51 pm
by Yoozername
We've been showing everything there is about PCO for months now. Gamers pretty much know if they want to buy it or not. They're just waiting for us to release it. Frankly, so am I. Then you and I can have some informed discussions about real issues.

Buy?  Its free since they have already bought in... but you knew that.

You clearly are two-faced since you supposedly wish CMBN luck here and post poison posts at gamesquat.  I am at least consistant.  And your knowledge of WWII armor is lacking.

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:54 pm
by Erik Rutins
Ok guys, that's enough. Personal attacks have no place here.

Regards,

- Erik

RE: If this game is going to be a Q1 2011 release...

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:54 pm
by Yoozername
ORIGINAL: Mad Russian

ORIGINAL: Mobius

ORIGINAL: Yoozername

I think the BS StuG thread has more posts than your 'Wood vs Mud Rusky' AAR has views!
That's mainly because it didn't have people insulting each other.

It didn't have a KV-2 in it either...[:(]


Good Hunting.

MR

On which side? I wonder if the Germans at one point had a greater fleet of running KV-2.