RE: Axis Only. Ronnie vs Composer99.
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2019 10:15 pm
Brian, thanks for the feedback. The impact of the ship profile didn't even occur to me during setup. It the future, it will!ORIGINAL: brian brian
I always set up the Japanese MAR like that, to walk in to Korea. Good practice for them, I guess. They end up counting as garrison in Korea, and are spotted in a port on 2 sea zones, with a lot of strategic flexibility going forward.
When setting up the Italian naval assets in a way to minimize risk from an Allied Taranto-Pearl Harbor type Port Strike attack, it is best to maximize the ship AA factors stacked with the TRS but also minimize the target profile - i.e., do not stack the Convoy Points with the TRS. Design the stack based on the rows and columns of the Naval Combat chart. So I stack all the best AA factors with the TRS and decide between adding 5 SCS to their port, or 9, but no more, to keep from moving too high up on the results table. Best is in the 1/3 games where the AA Gun is drawn for Italy, though it is also very very useful around Tobruk/Bardia.
And make sure the CPs have some AA factors with them, too. The TRS are _the_ most important counters Italy has until 1942 - but the Convoy Points are very high on that list too. They are slow to replace when you suddenly need them.
A pity the Frogman rule is not ready for prime time yet. Then you won't often see Royal Navy Fleet Carriers start out in Gibraltar. Or, if you do, then you know the Allies seek to DOW Italy on Turn 1. All moot here though.