Page 19 of 47
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:10 pm
by warspite1
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:37 pm
If, as Grigsby says, carriers are worth 10x battleships, the plan is a no brainer.
warspite1
The sentence that provides all I need to know. I am sorry to say you simply don't have a clue.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:11 pm
by Curtis Lemay
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:02 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:37 pm
Compare this "hardship" to being a Kamakaze!
warspite1
So you relate everything to kamakazes????? Pathetic.
Because it's crushing to your point.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:13 pm
by Curtis Lemay
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:06 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:37 pm
The carriers are providing fighter cover. And the aircraft on Oahu are being smashed.
warspite1
Hilarious. You simply can't get your story straight. You've changed this so many times its embarrassing. The KB remain off HI providing air cover, then the KB are sailing away as per history, then the KB are providing assistance to the Midway landings. It's all muddled nonsense.
The Bettys can be timed to arrive with the first strike. Later, the carriers will have zeros left on Maui.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:13 pm
by Curtis Lemay
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:00 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:37 pm
The idea that he intended his carriers to be torched in the Pearl raid is insane.
warspite1
When did I say anything like this? Don't you dare put words in my mouth.
Someone else did, though.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:14 pm
by warspite1
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:10 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:57 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:37 pm
We've agreed on two.
warspite1
No, not at all. You couldn't be bothered to detail a requirement so I tried a number to get things kick-started. But if you are saying Yamamoto was so certain about the carriers and their importance (such that he would be prepared to delay a war), then it would make sense that he would insist on two.
I've posted it more than once. Try to keep up.
warspite1
Nope - you simply responded to something I raised - and I raised it because you didn't understand the need to address the point in the first place! But that is your thought process all over - total lack of detail and awareness of what happened historically.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:14 pm
by warspite1
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:13 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:00 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:37 pm
The idea that he intended his carriers to be torched in the Pearl raid is insane.
warspite1
When did I say anything like this? Don't you dare put words in my mouth.
Someone else did, though.
warspite1
Then respond to them - don't waste my time.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:15 pm
by Curtis Lemay
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:10 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:37 pm
If, as Grigsby says, carriers are worth 10x battleships, the plan is a no brainer.
warspite1
The sentence that provides all I need to know. I am sorry to say you simply don't have a clue.
A carrier is worth 10x a battleship. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clueless.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:16 pm
by warspite1
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:11 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:02 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:37 pm
Compare this "hardship" to being a Kamakaze!
warspite1
So you relate everything to kamakazes????? Pathetic.
Because it's crushing to your point.
warspite1
No because its what you believe to be your get out of jail free card. The Japanese on Guadalcanal beat back the US attackers and evicted them from the island because of the spirit of the Kamakaze right?
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:16 pm
by Curtis Lemay
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:14 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:10 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:57 pm
warspite1
No, not at all. You couldn't be bothered to detail a requirement so I tried a number to get things kick-started. But if you are saying Yamamoto was so certain about the carriers and their importance (such that he would be prepared to delay a war), then it would make sense that he would insist on two.
I've posted it more than once. Try to keep up.
warspite1
Nope - you simply responded to something I raised - and I raised it because you didn't understand the need to address the point in the first place! But that is your thought process all over - total lack of detail and awareness of what happened historically.
Lots of detail and I did say two was the trigger.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:17 pm
by warspite1
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:13 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:06 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:37 pm
The carriers are providing fighter cover. And the aircraft on Oahu are being smashed.
warspite1
Hilarious. You simply can't get your story straight. You've changed this so many times its embarrassing. The KB remain off HI providing air cover, then the KB are sailing away as per history, then the KB are providing assistance to the Midway landings. It's all muddled nonsense.
The Bettys can be timed to arrive with the first strike. Later, the carriers will have zeros left on Maui.
warspite1
Of course - it's warfare, everything can be timed perfectly. Good grief....
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:18 pm
by Curtis Lemay
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:16 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:11 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:02 pm
warspite1
So you relate everything to kamakazes????? Pathetic.
Because it's crushing to your point.
warspite1
No because its what you believe to be your get out of jail free card. The Japanese on Guadalcanal beat back the US attackers and evicted them from the island because of the spirit of the Kamakaze right?
Anyone willing to fly a plane suicidally into a ship can handle a stint at sea.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:18 pm
by warspite1
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:15 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:10 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:37 pm
If, as Grigsby says, carriers are worth 10x battleships, the plan is a no brainer.
warspite1
The sentence that provides all I need to know. I am sorry to say you simply don't have a clue.
A carrier is worth 10x a battleship. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clueless.
warspite1
Yes 10x. Not 9x or 11x but 10x because a wargame maker used a subjective number for game play purposes.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:19 pm
by Curtis Lemay
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:17 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:13 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:06 pm
warspite1
Hilarious. You simply can't get your story straight. You've changed this so many times its embarrassing. The KB remain off HI providing air cover, then the KB are sailing away as per history, then the KB are providing assistance to the Midway landings. It's all muddled nonsense.
The Bettys can be timed to arrive with the first strike. Later, the carriers will have zeros left on Maui.
warspite1
Of course - it's warfare, everything can be timed perfectly. Good grief....
It doesn't have to be timed
perfectly. Just within the time frame of the first strike.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:20 pm
by warspite1
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:18 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:16 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:11 pm
Because it's crushing to your point.
warspite1
No because its what you believe to be your get out of jail free card. The Japanese on Guadalcanal beat back the US attackers and evicted them from the island because of the spirit of the Kamakaze right?
Anyone willing to fly a plane suicidally into a ship can handle a stint at sea.
warspite1
Lots of embarrassing posts - this one is pretty much the best. So ALL Japanese are the same person???? Every Japanese soldier could endure anything because some Japanese became Kamakaze???? Wow.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:21 pm
by Curtis Lemay
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:18 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:15 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:10 pm
warspite1
The sentence that provides all I need to know. I am sorry to say you simply don't have a clue.
A carrier is worth 10x a battleship. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clueless.
warspite1
Yes 10x. Not 9x or 11x but 10x because a wargame maker used a subjective number for game play purposes.
Probably more than 10x. Regardless, carriers are far more valuable than battleships. That makes the plan a no brainer.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:23 pm
by warspite1
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:19 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:17 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:13 pm
The Bettys can be timed to arrive with the first strike. Later, the carriers will have zeros left on Maui.
warspite1
Of course - it's warfare, everything can be timed perfectly. Good grief....
It doesn't have to be timed
perfectly. Just within the time frame of the first strike.
warspite1
It does have to be timed perfectly. Too late and the Bettys walk into an alert enemy over Oahu. Too early and the Betty's alert the defenders of Oahu to the incoming carrier strike.
Too early for the landing on Maui and the Bettys land on an airfield in US hands.
Yes, this ridiculously complex 'plan' needed precision. But you don't bother with detail.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:25 pm
by warspite1
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:21 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:18 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:15 pm
A carrier is worth 10x a battleship. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clueless.
warspite1
Yes 10x. Not 9x or 11x but 10x because a wargame maker used a subjective number for game play purposes.
Probably more than 10x. Regardless, carriers are far more valuable than battleships. That make the plan a no brainer.
warspite1
But everyone knows carriers are more valuable than battleships - you don't need to quote Grigsby and a factor of 10x.
But if everyone - and particularly Yamamoto - knew this in 1941 why wasn't your 'plan' adopted?
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:25 pm
by Curtis Lemay
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:20 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:18 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:16 pm
warspite1
No because its what you believe to be your get out of jail free card. The Japanese on Guadalcanal beat back the US attackers and evicted them from the island because of the spirit of the Kamakaze right?
Anyone willing to fly a plane suicidally into a ship can handle a stint at sea.
warspite1
Lots of embarrassing posts - this one is pretty much the best. So ALL Japanese are the same person???? Every Japanese soldier could endure anything because some Japanese became Kamakaze???? Wow.
The Bushido code was universal.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:26 pm
by Curtis Lemay
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:23 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:19 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:17 pm
warspite1
Of course - it's warfare, everything can be timed perfectly. Good grief....
It doesn't have to be timed
perfectly. Just within the time frame of the first strike.
warspite1
It does have to be timed perfectly. Too late and the Bettys walk into an alert enemy over Oahu. Too early and the Betty's alert the defenders of Oahu to the incoming carrier strike.
Too early for the landing on Maui and the Bettys land on an airfield in US hands.
Yes, this ridiculously complex 'plan' needed precision. But you don't bother with detail.
They have these things called radios!!! That's how they coordinate.
Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:27 pm
by Curtis Lemay
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:25 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:21 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 5:18 pm
warspite1
Yes 10x. Not 9x or 11x but 10x because a wargame maker used a subjective number for game play purposes.
Probably more than 10x. Regardless, carriers are far more valuable than battleships. That make the plan a no brainer.
warspite1
But everyone knows carriers are more valuable than battleships - you don't need to quote Grigsby and a factor of 10x.
But if everyone - and particularly Yamamoto - knew this in 1941 why wasn't your 'plan' adopted?
So that's the argument: They didn't do it, therefore they couldn't do it. No hypotheticals ever.