Page 216 of 324

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 11:18 am
by Encircled
Lowpe wrote: Fri Sep 30, 2022 11:08 am Our Marine Recon squadron...

a.jpg
It will upgrade, just takes time

There isn't a fragment somewhere, or a destroyed bit is there?

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 12:00 pm
by Lowpe
Probably need to destroy more than 9 enemy fighters per day...
a.jpg
a.jpg (97.58 KiB) Viewed 726 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 12:00 pm
by Lowpe
Encircled wrote: Fri Sep 30, 2022 11:18 am
Lowpe wrote: Fri Sep 30, 2022 11:08 am Our Marine Recon squadron...

a.jpg
It will upgrade, just takes time

There isn't a fragment somewhere, or a destroyed bit is there?
No, no fragment.

According to Alfred, and my experience, it won't upgrade.

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 1:45 pm
by Encircled
Ah, well if Alfred says so then that is good enough for me!

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 4:02 pm
by Lowpe
I will issue the same challenge I did Ranger Joe....upgrade a squadron that is to be perm withdrawn, with less planes in the pool.

I have never done it...Alfred says it is hardcoded...

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 6:39 pm
by RangerJoe
Lowpe wrote: Fri Sep 30, 2022 11:08 am Our Marine Recon squadron...

a.jpg
Did you try resizing the air unit?

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 7:30 pm
by Lowpe
Oooh...great idea Ranger! :lol:

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 9:45 pm
by RangerJoe
Lowpe wrote: Fri Sep 30, 2022 7:30 pm Oooh...great idea Ranger! :lol:
Don't tell me that you did not think of that solution!

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 10:07 pm
by Lowpe
I don't ever really use the resize feature....in pbems.

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2022 2:04 am
by RangerJoe
Lowpe wrote: Fri Sep 30, 2022 10:07 pm I don't ever really use the resize feature....in pbems.
Oh . . .

Well, most people want things larger . . .

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2022 12:37 pm
by Lowpe
Maintaining daily bombardments....using smaller task forces...
a.jpg
a.jpg (276.2 KiB) Viewed 579 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2022 11:54 pm
by Lowpe
March 20, 1943

The IJN sortied some SAGs in an attempt to destroy our destroyer ;) that was hit by a mine at Manus on the way back to Finn....PT boats, destroyers and CL SAGs went to protect....
a.jpg
a.jpg (280.94 KiB) Viewed 535 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2022 11:54 pm
by Lowpe
Round 2...
admiral.jpg
admiral.jpg (317.06 KiB) Viewed 534 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2022 11:57 pm
by Lowpe
Nobody else finds the elusive Japanese...still masters of the night!

An Sboat puts a torpedo into the light cruiser Raleigh, which aborts there mission. All my task forces, except for the PT boats had settings of safer and low so they would hopefully not dither and be nailed by the KB or the Yamato.

Sweeps commenced over Rabaul...Corsairs are like a hot knife thru butter! :lol:
animated armor image.jpg
animated armor image.jpg (618.96 KiB) Viewed 532 times
Morning Air attack on Rabaul , at 106,125

Weather in hex: Thunderstorms

Raid spotted at 42 NM, estimated altitude 39,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 15 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2-N Rufe x 1
A6M5 Zero x 33
A6M5b Zero x 17
Ki-43-IIb Oscar x 24
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar x 43

Allied aircraft
F4U-1 Corsair x 17

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zero: 1 destroyed
A6M5b Zero: 2 destroyed
Ki-43-IIb Oscar: 2 destroyed
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar: 5 destroyed

No Allied losses

Morning Air attack on Rabaul , at 106,125

Weather in hex: Thunderstorms

Raid spotted at 28 NM, estimated altitude 37,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2-N Rufe x 1
A6M5 Zero x 5
A6M5b Zero x 7
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar x 4

Allied aircraft
F4U-1 Corsair x 14

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zero: 3 destroyed
A6M5b Zero: 3 destroyed
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar: 3 destroyed

No Allied losses

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2022 11:59 pm
by Lowpe
Heavy bombers then hit the runway at Rabaul...one of several strikes below

Morning Air attack on Rabaul , at 106,125

Weather in hex: Thunderstorms

Raid spotted at 17 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2-N Rufe x 1
A6M5 Zero x 9
A6M5b Zero x 9
Ki-43-IIb Oscar x 1
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar x 7

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 6

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar: 7 damaged
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar: 1 destroyed on ground

Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged

Runway hits 4

Aircraft Attacking:
5 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 9000 feet
Airfield Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2022 11:59 pm
by Lowpe
Butchers bill in the air for the day...Japan counter invades Aitape with a MG unit...
b.jpg
b.jpg (463.27 KiB) Viewed 530 times

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 12:07 am
by ushakov
Lowpe wrote: Sat Oct 01, 2022 11:57 pm An Sboat puts a torpedo into the light cruiser Raleigh
Sounds like someone's getting court-martialled!

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 12:16 am
by RangerJoe
ushakov wrote: Sun Oct 02, 2022 12:07 am
Lowpe wrote: Sat Oct 01, 2022 11:57 pm An Sboat puts a torpedo into the light cruiser Raleigh
Sounds like someone's getting court-martialled!
"Friendly" fire is always more accurate than enemy fire!

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 12:21 am
by Lowpe
Ooops, Iboat I mean... :oops: Always amazed at how the goofs get caught!

Re: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 12:25 am
by Lowpe
Another low aggression Captain doing good work!

The damaged ships return to Port at Finn....At Buna there is an AD and an AR...
b.jpg
b.jpg (324.83 KiB) Viewed 502 times