British Unit with low Exp

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

ckammp
Posts: 756
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Rear Area training facility

RE: British Unit with low Exp

Post by ckammp »

ORIGINAL: Dixie
ORIGINAL: ckammp

Your fellow RN fanboy issued a challenge to find a post suggesting that someone claimed RN subs should be rated higher than US subs. I answered that challenge - post#4 in this thread.
This claim was made with NO evidence for support, yet you RN fanboys eagerly accept it as true. When someone dared to question this claim, the result was several posts proudly proclaiming the superiority of the RN, and denigrating the performance of the USN.
As a US veteran, I really don't appreciate all the negative posts about the US; if that makes me 'thin-skinned', then so be it. If my responses upset you sensitive RN fanboys, well, sorry. Taking pride in your military is one thing, degrading another country's military is another. If you RN fanboys can do the former without also doing the latter, then you'll hear nothing from me.

And yes, there are people saying nice things about the US in this thread; my point is there are also a lot of people saying bad things about the US in this thread.

As for John Wayne, if you told him that RN captains were better than US captains, he'd knock you on your ...

Well, I'm not an RN fanboy. Boats are *** [:'(] And being stuck in a metal tube that goes underwater is even more so [;)] I didn't remember the post you mentioned, fair enough it was there and you found it. Have a medal. Now if you'd said I was an RAF fanboy you might be closer to the mark.

There aren't a lot of people saying bad things about the US in this thread at all. [:-] Just some sort of persecution problem from a USN fanboy. There is a post where someone says that RN skippers were (are) better than USN counterparts. It doesn't automatically make the implication that USN skippers were poor or denigrate their capabilities. Unless you are so insecure that you need to shout out your defence of the USN at every opportunity.
Or perhaps the Brits should start complaining that there is a lot of RN bashing going on in here from lots of USN fanboys. Except that (1) there isn't any bashing going on and (2) it seems you're only a fanboy when you aren't pro-USA [8|]

And as for John Wayne. He'd find it difficult to knock me on my arse. Because he's not in a position to do much knocking [:D][:'(]


The USN and RN fought different wars, the conditions and enemies were different. Apples and Oranges. The USN didn't fight the war that the RN did, the RN didn't fight the same war the US did.
For the most part (and I know it wasn't the entire war and some factors were similar) the USN fought a war in the open waters of the Pacific with long range boats. Transit times were longer but probably safer. The USN war was in some ways forced to the fore with the surface fleet battered at PH leaving the ubs as the main way to prosecute the war against an opponent with a large merchent force.
The RN fought in more confined waters in the Med, the transit times were shorter but more dangerous. Shallow, clear water made things tricky as did some extensive minefields. The offensive war wasn't as much of a priority for us Brits. Subs were used where possible, but iirc a fair bit of effort was put towards anti u-boat patrols and supply missions to Malta. In the Far East the RN subs mainly carried out shorter patrols around the DEI or Malacca Straits.
EDIT: In essence: The USN wouldn't have done too well in the Med with their more vulnerable, more visible big boats, the RN wouldn't have done too well against the Japanese HI with their smaller shorter ranged boats.

If my repsonse upsets you sensitive USN fanboys, then I don't care. Go and cry about it. Then get a medal, you seem to get them for everything else...

The entire point of this thread WAS that some RN captains had seemingly low ratings given their experience of several years of warfare.



P.S. If sprior is reading this... Submarines are really *** [:'(]

Odd that you don't remember post #4, you being the author of post #5![;)]

Anyhow, while still maintaining I am in the right, I recognize that my posts have not necessarily been constructive in regards to the topic of this thread.

I hereby apologize, if anyone was offended by anything I wrote.

However, I will never apologize for being a USA fanboy. Neither will I hesitate to defend myself.
The medals I have, were EARNED.
In combat.
And no-one has ANY right to question their validity.[:-]

And John Wayne? Yes, he's been dead these 30 years, but this 'handicap' just means a fight with a RAF fanboy will be a fair one![:'(]
ckammp
Posts: 756
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Rear Area training facility

RE: British Unit with low Exp

Post by ckammp »

ORIGINAL: Frank
ORIGINAL: ckammp

Oh, look!
Another post containing an unsubstantiated 'anecdote' disparaging the USN.[8|]

If you can't compare the quality of sub captains by their results in battle, how do you compare them?
I've seen no evidence presented by you or any of the RN fanboys to justify the claim that RN (or German) sub captains were the best in the world. Lacking that evidence, one must look at the historical record. Doing so leads one to the unmistakeble conclusion that the in-game stats are historical and accurate.

Again, kudos to the devs for getting it right in the FIRST place![&o]

oh, you can compare the quality of a sub captain by their results in battle, if the circumstances are the same and the opponent is the same. Else you can´t.

Were there any US subs in the Med? I didn´t find any.
Why not? Because the large US boats were not suited for the clear shallow water of the Med. [:'(]Obviously the US admirals in WW2 thought that US skippers wern´t able to work under this circumstances (maybe they had too little skill? [;)] )

And here is another person who thinks the US achievements weren´t so difficult to make: "They sunk almost 1300 Japanese merchant ships, and many warships, for a loss of 52 submarines of a total of 288, a remarkable achievement which was aided by the fact that unlike the British, the Japanese neglected to properly escort and protect their merchant ships until the end of the war."
(http://www.2worldwar2.com/submarines.htm)


Today German subs are able to close to US CVNs without larger problems. They even run into NY harbour undetected. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfjYZUiO ... 77&index=1)

The skippers of German U-boats aren´t better than their US counterparts, they just have more silent equipment. ( http://www.military-today.com/navy/u_212a_class.htm )

Following your argumentation US skippers suck because they can not do this with their noisier SSNs.
My opinion is you cannot compare the quality by these means. (Which is also stressed by Captain Borcherts, commander of 19th U-Boot-Flotille http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_6 ... n28687352/ )

The US and Germany were opponents in WWII. Using your logic, how can battle results be compared?
Answer: They can't.
Without battle results, it's rather hard to decide who's better, isn't it?
But that doesn't stop you from loudly proclaiming the "ultimate" superiority of German captains, does it?
While at the same time repeatedly insulting the USN.[8|]

At any rate, this game, and this thread, are about the war in the Pacific; there are no German subs in this game, therefore your arguements are irrelevant.
User avatar
frank1970
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Bayern

RE: British Unit with low Exp

Post by frank1970 »

ORIGINAL: ckammp




The US and Germany were opponents in WWII. Using your logic, how can battle results be compared?
Answer: They can't.
Without battle results, it's rather hard to decide who's better, isn't it?
But that doesn't stop you from loudly proclaiming the "ultimate" superiority of German captains, does it?
While at the same time repeatedly insulting the USN.[8|]

At any rate, this game, and this thread, are about the war in the Pacific; there are no German subs in this game, therefore your arguements are irrelevant.

Where did I claim that German sub skippers were superior to anyone else?
I just answered to our British friend, who told us the Brits were the very best, that German skippers weren´t that bad.
As a matter of fact I "fought on your side", resulting in a typical problem, when fighting on the side of the Americans: friendly fire [:'(] !
Just to prove my point read the next post.
If you like what I said love me,if you dislike what I say ignore me!

"Extra Bavaria non est vita! Et sic est vita non est ita!"

User avatar
frank1970
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Bayern

RE: British Unit with low Exp

Post by frank1970 »

ORIGINAL: Frank

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: latosusi

RN submarine captains were best in the world. (And still probably are)

[8|]

German weren´t and aren´t too bad either ;-)

Where did I post German skippers are superior to American ones?
If you like what I said love me,if you dislike what I say ignore me!

"Extra Bavaria non est vita! Et sic est vita non est ita!"

User avatar
frank1970
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Bayern

RE: British Unit with low Exp

Post by frank1970 »

ORIGINAL: ckammp


The US and Germany were opponents in WWII. Using your logic, how can battle results be compared?
Answer: They can't.
Without battle results, it's rather hard to decide who's better, isn't it?
But that doesn't stop you from loudly proclaiming the "ultimate" superiority of German captains, does it?
While at the same time repeatedly insulting the USN.[8|]

At any rate, this game, and this thread, are about the war in the Pacific; there are no German subs in this game, therefore your arguements are irrelevant.

What, no German subs in WITP AE????????
Scandal!
http://www.uboat.net/ops/monsun.htm
"The Monsun U-boats were perhaps the most special "wolfpack" in the war as they operated very far from Germany and its occupied countries, namely in the Indian Ocean out of japanese provided bases in Indonesia. They operated out of Penang, Jakarta and Sabang in 1943-1945 and scored some hits against allied shipping."

One was even given to the Japanese and fought a I500.

[:'(]

If you like what I said love me,if you dislike what I say ignore me!

"Extra Bavaria non est vita! Et sic est vita non est ita!"

ckammp
Posts: 756
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Rear Area training facility

RE: British Unit with low Exp

Post by ckammp »

ORIGINAL: Frank

Now get real, gentlemen!

Neither the German nor the Japanese nor the Italians had any ASW abilities to speak of. The Allies were the best, plain and simple.
Therefore the Germans have the ultimate sub skippers. Just ask yourself, whether any of the Allied sub skippers would have sunk his tonnage against Allied ASW.

People trying to minimize the British subs´achievements should just compare the plain size of the Med with the Pacific to get some impression about the problems British, Italian and German subs had to fight with in the Med.

Perhaps it's just a translation problem; it looks to me like you are claiming that the Germans have the "ultimate sub skippers."

And maybe they do.
Or maybe the British.
Or the Americans.
Or someone else.
I've never claimed that any were the best, or the worst. All I asked, was if you or anyone else could prove your claims of who's best WITHOUT bashing/insulting other countries.
While I feel there has been unnecessary denigrating of the US, I also recognize that my posts regarding this could easily be seen as rude and insulting themselves. For this I sincerly apologize.

For the record, I do wish that German subs were in the game (and not just the transferred to Japan - IIRC there were 2-3).They would at least give the RN something to do![:D]
User avatar
sprior
Posts: 8294
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 11:38 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK

RE: British Unit with low Exp

Post by sprior »

For the record, I do wish that German subs were in the game (and not just the transferred to Japan - IIRC there were 2-3).They would at least give the RN something to do!

But not for long[:D]
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.

Image
User avatar
EUBanana
Posts: 4255
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 3:48 pm
Location: Little England
Contact:

RE: British Unit with low Exp

Post by EUBanana »

Unfortunately WITP Jap players traditionally eye India with a hungry gaze, so there usually is plenty for the RN to do... usually involving telling the USN "bring guns, lawyers and USS Enterprise, the shit has hit the fan!".

HMS Warspite sinking one of Sprior's CVLs and badly damaging another in a stormy night off Colombo remains my high point in this game. [:D]
Image
User avatar
sprior
Posts: 8294
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 11:38 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK

RE: British Unit with low Exp

Post by sprior »

That's right, go ahead, remind me.
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.

Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: British Unit with low Exp

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Dixie
Then get a medal, you seem to get them for everything else...
Dixie,

This is unhelpful language.
Image
User avatar
frank1970
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Bayern

RE: British Unit with low Exp

Post by frank1970 »

ORIGINAL: ckammp

ORIGINAL: Frank

Now get real, gentlemen!

Neither the German nor the Japanese nor the Italians had any ASW abilities to speak of. The Allies were the best, plain and simple.
Therefore the Germans have the ultimate sub skippers. Just ask yourself, whether any of the Allied sub skippers would have sunk his tonnage against Allied ASW.

People trying to minimize the British subs´achievements should just compare the plain size of the Med with the Pacific to get some impression about the problems British, Italian and German subs had to fight with in the Med.

Perhaps it's just a translation problem; it looks to me like you are claiming that the Germans have the "ultimate sub skippers."

And maybe they do.
Or maybe the British.
Or the Americans.
Or someone else.
I've never claimed that any were the best, or the worst. All I asked, was if you or anyone else could prove your claims of who's best WITHOUT bashing/insulting other countries.
While I feel there has been unnecessary denigrating of the US, I also recognize that my posts regarding this could easily be seen as rude and insulting themselves. For this I sincerly apologize.

For the record, I do wish that German subs were in the game (and not just the transferred to Japan - IIRC there were 2-3).They would at least give the RN something to do![:D]

Hey, no problem. As I said, I am no native speaker. I did never want to hurt someones feelings. If I did I apologize. I just want to play this very good game and I want it so historical correct as possible!

Kind regards.
If you like what I said love me,if you dislike what I say ignore me!

"Extra Bavaria non est vita! Et sic est vita non est ita!"

User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 8126
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

RE: British Unit with low Exp

Post by jwilkerson »

I don't have time to read through this whole thread - but I am getting complaints about some of the posts - so if someone is bothered by any posts in here let me know which post.

WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”