It might be a bit unbalanced, it's very tough to judge...my personal feeling is, that the Germans are tougher to play, although do not have a severe setback...Originally posted by Goblin
When you weigh in that I had 20 of them, plus 6 OT34/85's, while Orzel probably had half that many tanks, if that, then it seems like it is slightly unbalanced. Cost equals combat effectiveness to me. Not strategic cost/production.
The Germans have a specialized type of unit for almost every task, whereas I see Russian equipement often more generalized and balanced in itself...therefore I think the most difficult part playing the Germans is to have the right equipement at hand for a given task...in terms of purchasing that can get pretty tough...not so the Russians - you cannot make many things wrong when putting together your force...
To stay with your T-34/85 example, it pretty much depends on the battle setup and the forces your opponent picked, if you really got an advantage or not...
To me it sounds like an armored engagement, with infantry playing a support role...if you know that as the German player, one should be able to counter your troops by a few anti-T-34 units...4 or 5 late war German tank hunters in the hands of a skillfull player should be enough to pick up your T-34s on open ground...but if you gambled wrong and no tanks show up, but infantry instead, your're pretty much screwed with your Jagdpanthers
So I think yes, battles between Germans and Russians can be unbalanced, due to the fact that the German purchasing is more difficult...but experience of a player can compensate that in most cases, I hope - that is at least what I had in mind, when working on the costs








