Small Scen VS AI

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Technopiper
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:27 am

RE: Small Scen VS AI

Post by Technopiper »

tarkalak, that's a very detailed explanation. You highlighted everything I've been scratching my head over. Thanks!

And yeah, Nates and Oscars tend to drop like flies. I'll take RangerJoe's advice and use them as LRCAP.
Technopiper
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:27 am

RE: Small Scen VS AI

Post by Technopiper »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

A suggestion, use thee Nates for LRCAP on the enemy airfields at a low percentage level. This will increase his ops losses. If you say there are little to no replacements and Nates aren't good offensively, then that is a good option. Nates can also be good for CAP as the are maneuverable and the escorts are at a disadvantage. Even if the Nates don't shoot down too many bombers, they can damage them which increases the chance for an ops loss as well as spoil their aim. It is probably very hard to concentrate when a bullet whizzes by your ear . . .
That's a good suggestion. I've noticed that fighters fought at an disadvantage when escorting bombers. Guess that make sense since they need to fight and babysit at the same time.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”