Attack outcome

Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: The German-Soviet War 1941-1945 is a turn-based World War II strategy game stretching across the entire Eastern Front. Gamers can engage in an epic campaign, including division-sized battles with realistic and historical terrain, weather, orders of battle, logistics and combat results.

The critically and fan-acclaimed Eastern Front mega-game Gary Grigsby’s War in the East just got bigger and better with Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube! This expansion to the award-winning War in the East comes with a wide array of later war scenarios ranging from short but intense 6 turn bouts like the Battle for Kharkov (1942) to immense 37-turn engagements taking place across multiple nations like Drama on the Danube (Summer 1944 – Spring 1945).

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21, elmo3

Post Reply
User avatar
mrhuggles
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:22 pm

Attack outcome

Post by mrhuggles »

Hello, i am a new player, is this a normal attack outcome? I tried really hard on it



Image
MattFL
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 9:48 pm
Contact:

RE: Attack outcome

Post by MattFL »

There must be more involved than what is shown on this screen, but seeing the LOST of 11,000+ men is pretty shocking. Also, seems that you have the +1 in effect for the Soviets, actual odds are 1.38:1. What was the situation, were the defenders Isolated or anything? Can't get my head around the 11k lost in July '41 of all things...
User avatar
mrhuggles
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:22 pm

RE: Attack outcome

Post by mrhuggles »

After some investigation i believe I have found the cause, this infantry unit has very high morale, causing it to do significant damage to the axis units:

Image
User avatar
Crackaces
Posts: 3858
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:39 pm

RE: Attack outcome

Post by Crackaces »

There are two very distinct mechanisms in this game. CV and firepower. What was the terrain or ZOC for the retreat hex?

Soviet firepower did this damage .. CV only determines if it is a held or a retreat. Some of this has to be retreat casualties? with the logistics phase attrition causing even more German losses .. ..
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
SparkleyTits
Posts: 904
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:15 pm
Location: England

RE: Attack outcome

Post by SparkleyTits »

[X(]
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2240
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Attack outcome

Post by Seminole »

Did they have to retreat through multiple hexes (with enemy ZOC)?
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
thedoctorking
Posts: 2971
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:00 am

RE: Attack outcome

Post by thedoctorking »

Poor morale of the Slovakian Mobile Brigade? But they are listed as retreating, not shattered or surrendered. I'd say most of these losses were retreat casualties, if the defenders had to retreat through a bunch of ZOC's.

I see 1000+ guns on the Soviet side. Lots of firepower can cause a lot of damage.

Look at the "show details" tab on the battle report for more information.
User avatar
xhoel
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 7:46 pm
Location: Germany

RE: Attack outcome

Post by xhoel »

This must be a bug of sorts. The losses are way too high even for a retreat through enemy ZOC. We are talking about 2 German Infantry divisions + a Slovakian Mobile one defending in July of 1941. There is no way in hell that the Soviets were able to inflict that many casualties especially considering that they only outnumbered the defenders 2 to 1 in both men and guns. Even if the Slovakians had routed, the casualties would have been much lower. This is the kind of casualties that are taken when units are surrounded and destroyed.

The morale of the Soviet division is nothing spectacular and cannot have been the cause for such a result.
AAR WITW: Gotterdammerung 43-45
tm.asp?m=4490035
AAR WITE: A Clash of Titans 41-45
tm.asp?m=4488465
WitE 2 Tester and Test Coordinator
SparkleyTits
Posts: 904
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:15 pm
Location: England

RE: Attack outcome

Post by SparkleyTits »

What are the EXP levels of the divisions, air, SU you are using?
EXP is much more important than morale for causing losses

11k though! [X(]
I've never been able to get anything close to this off of a mere retreat so something funny may be happening as Xhoel suggested?
User avatar
HardLuckYetAgain
Posts: 9301
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:26 am

RE: Attack outcome

Post by HardLuckYetAgain »

What patch was the result obtained under?

Kantti
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 3:57 am

RE: Attack outcome

Post by Kantti »

There are also some odd results now on Soviet side. I am playing bitter end and am now on turn 11. No major encirclements after first turns, but Germans still capture tens of thousand soviets each turn just from normal casualties. Has this always been this way (and now visible because no isolated units are inflating the count) or is this something new?
User avatar
Crackaces
Posts: 3858
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:39 pm

RE: Attack outcome

Post by Crackaces »

ORIGINAL: Kantti

There are also some odd results now on Soviet side. I am playing bitter end and am now on turn 11. No major encirclements after first turns, but Germans still capture tens of thousand soviets each turn just from normal casualties. Has this always been this way (and now visible because no isolated units are inflating the count) or is this something new?

By "normal" casualties .. there is a spectrum of engagements. All the way from a hasty attack vs a unit in terrain retreating to terrain no zoc all the way to a deliberate attack with units "soaked" in SU's and supported by HQ's "soaked" with SU's vs a target well ZOC'ed with a retreat across a major river. I have seen an increase in captures and especially in the logistics phase with situations more like the latter.

When enough firepower is brought into play I am finding more disabled squads/devices and then on the initial retreat disabled squads are checked for destroyed. ZOC's and rivers add tremendously. There are consecutive die rolls for every device. If this is not the situation and randomly a situation more like the former is causing huge casualties .. I would then venture there is a bug. But we need to know more about the behavior.
"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"
SparkleyTits
Posts: 904
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:15 pm
Location: England

RE: Attack outcome

Post by SparkleyTits »

One situation I could think that might explain your conundrum is that Soviets can get some relative numbers captured without encirclements when instigating fighting retreats through Axis ZOC to escape isolation, those kind of situations etc

It leads to higher capture rates, same goes for Axis as they force themselves through ZOC too
No idea
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 11:19 am

RE: Attack outcome

Post by No idea »

Wow. I have never seen those casualties for the germans unless surrendering, something they hqvent. And it is july 41... frankly I dont know how you got those numbers but you hit the jackpot.
User avatar
mrhuggles
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:22 pm

RE: Attack outcome

Post by mrhuggles »

Thank you for the insightful replies everyone.
Those are some interesting theories crackaces, i looked into what you said.

Image

Perhaps this howitzer is the cause of these casualties. It has a formidable 43 guns. Doing some quick calculations this means each gun would only have to kill or disable 256.11 Axis soldiers each, a reasonable sum IMO.

@HLYA This is on the current patch

@SparkleTit Hmmmm, good idea but that seems a little unrealistic


User avatar
mrhuggles
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:22 pm

RE: Attack outcome

Post by mrhuggles »

Unfortunately, despite brave Soviet efforts, not every offensive action can be a success. For instance, due to bad luck this prudent attack was a failure. [:(]



Image

Fetterkrolle
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2018 10:47 am

RE: Attack outcome

Post by Fetterkrolle »

I can't believe I have not seen this post yet. I was the axis player in this game and this was by far the best part of our game.
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series”