My original strategy was a Classic Barbarossa in May 41. Reading posts on the forum I saw that my infantry technology at the time was 1 when it should have been 2. My mistake.
Penetrations were not deep enough the first year. In 42 I focused on taking Leningrad and Murmansk. Advancing the rest of the line.
In the Mediterranean theater, at the expense of the Regia Marina the Royal Navy was destroyed.
We reached March 43. Here is my situation:
Diplomatically I'm desperately courting Turkey:
Technologically it could be better (I accept guidance):
These are my remaining production options:
On the Scandinavian front, the Soviet situation, after months of resistance, began to crumble. Supplements are a problem in this area:
On the northern front things are calm. I must restart secondary offensive operations soon to continue relieving the main line of advance:
The center has the majority of armored vehicles and was therefore able to stop a giant Soviet counterattack. Thanks to advances in the south, many of the Soviet troops were redeployed, allowing them to dream of a new offensive:
In the south, after taking Rostov and seeing an empty road to Stalingrad, I could see the Soviets bring reinforcements from the center to defend the region.
My current strategy is to take Archangelsk to the north and start putting pressure on Moscow via Novgorod.
In the center, break the line in a pincer movement and surround the Soviets in Orel.
In the south I intend to break Rostov into the Caucasus.
Rommel arrived in Iraq without objection and the Americans were destroyed at sea before arriving in Algeria, where they managed to land only a infantry corps. Kesselring is going to sort things out there.
Wish me luck. I accept suggestions