Air HQ Hierarchy and Aircraft Assignment

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3161
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

Air HQ Hierarchy and Aircraft Assignment

Post by Dereck »

Trying to understand assigning aircraft to AIR HQs and also subordinate AIR HQs to higher HQs.

For the example below:

1st Marine Air Wing (AV36)
|
+--> 11th MAG (AV72)
+--> 21st MAG (AV72)

How does proper command work? Assign 72 aircraft to each Marine Air Group and 36 directly to the air wing?

What happens if more aircraft are assigned than the aviation capacity?
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18284
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Air HQ Hierarchy and Aircraft Assignment

Post by RangerJoe »

I don't think that you understand how HQs work nor how aviation support works.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3161
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

Re: Air HQ Hierarchy and Aircraft Assignment

Post by Dereck »

RangerJoe wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 2:22 pm I don't think that you understand how HQs work nor how aviation support works.
That's obvious otherwise I wouldn't be asking this question. Could you please possibly explain it to me or direct me to a thread where it is explained?
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18284
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Air HQ Hierarchy and Aircraft Assignment

Post by RangerJoe »

Dereck wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 3:08 pm
RangerJoe wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 2:22 pm I don't think that you understand how HQs work nor how aviation support works.
That's obvious otherwise I wouldn't be asking this question. Could you please possibly explain it to me or direct me to a thread where it is explained?
Open up the manual, turn to page 178, start reading about the Headquarters units, section 8.1.1 . . .

Then turn to page 159 and read "7.2.1.5 AIR HQS AND AIR MISSIONS" . . .
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
Chris21wen
Posts: 7528
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

Re: Air HQ Hierarchy and Aircraft Assignment

Post by Chris21wen »

Dereck wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 1:02 pm Trying to understand assigning aircraft to AIR HQs and also subordinate AIR HQs to higher HQs.

For the example below:

1st Marine Air Wing (AV36)
|
+--> 11th MAG (AV72)
+--> 21st MAG (AV72)

How does proper command work? Assign 72 aircraft to each Marine Air Group and 36 directly to the air wing?

What happens if more aircraft are assigned than the aviation capacity?
I do not know what scenario you are using, stock does not have them. Please post your scenario.

You cannot assign aircraft to air HQ full stop. You can assign air groups to be commanded by air HQ.

They is no limit to how many groups that can be assigned to an air HQ.

Air groups are only authorised a certain number of ac but that number varies enormously. In generally each group can have 4 reseave aircraft. For pilots you can have up to 1/3 more.

Apart from the manul you might find this useful https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 3&t=396274

Note I've just remember that the edit has the ability greate Combined AIr Groups (CAG). Is this what these are? If so here's what I know taken from the unofficial Editor guide.

Air Group when selected the unit becomes a Combine Air Group (CAG). These units do not have any aircraft
themselves, instead have Air Group attached to them. They act like small HQs but with fewer abilities. CAG can still be
used, especially for carrier based units but from what little I've gleaned on them they don't work as intended. I've
seen no official scenario use them so I'd leave them alone.
User avatar
Dereck
Posts: 3161
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: Romulus, MI

Re: Air HQ Hierarchy and Aircraft Assignment

Post by Dereck »

Chris21wen wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 7:11 am
Dereck wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 1:02 pm Trying to understand assigning aircraft to AIR HQs and also subordinate AIR HQs to higher HQs.

For the example below:

1st Marine Air Wing (AV36)
|
+--> 11th MAG (AV72)
+--> 21st MAG (AV72)

How does proper command work? Assign 72 aircraft to each Marine Air Group and 36 directly to the air wing?

What happens if more aircraft are assigned than the aviation capacity?
I do not know what scenario you are using, stock does not have them. Please post your scenario.

You cannot assign aircraft to air HQ full stop. You can assign air groups to be commanded by air HQ.

They is no limit to how many groups that can be assigned to an air HQ.

Air groups are only authorised a certain number of ac but that number varies enormously. In generally each group can have 4 reseave aircraft. For pilots you can have up to 1/3 more.

Apart from the manul you might find this useful https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 3&t=396274

Note I've just remember that the edit has the ability greate Combined AIr Groups (CAG). Is this what these are? If so here's what I know taken from the unofficial Editor guide.

Air Group when selected the unit becomes a Combine Air Group (CAG). These units do not have any aircraft
themselves, instead have Air Group attached to them. They act like small HQs but with fewer abilities. CAG can still be
used, especially for carrier based units but from what little I've gleaned on them they don't work as intended. I've
seen no official scenario use them so I'd leave them alone.
This is my own scenario I've had since the first WITP days. I've checked the stock full campaign scenario and I found them listed in the editor. I didn't specifically add them (I did add a lot of missing ships but no HQs) so they were there at one time.
PO2 US Navy (1980-1986);
USS Midway CV-41 (1981-1984)
Whidbey Island, WA (1984-1986)
Naval Reserve (1986-1992)
Chris21wen
Posts: 7528
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

Re: Air HQ Hierarchy and Aircraft Assignment

Post by Chris21wen »

I played around with CAG sometime ago and they were a bit iffy, well more than a bit. I think this is why stock does not use them.
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12589
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

Re: Air HQ Hierarchy and Aircraft Assignment

Post by Sardaukar »

Whole HQ system is quite simplified.

But it helps to have air units in same base to be under same HQ.

We'd have shitstorm of complaints if we'd have to actually have realistic command structure...
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
Chris21wen
Posts: 7528
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

Re: Air HQ Hierarchy and Aircraft Assignment

Post by Chris21wen »

Sardaukar wrote: Wed Oct 08, 2025 6:14 am ...

We'd have shitstorm of complaints if we'd have to actually have realistic command structure...
Arrrrrgh
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”