Naval search

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
Chris21wen
Posts: 7520
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

Naval search

Post by Chris21wen »

First started this to test Glens usefulness but it escalated. Much of this is well known, this just confirms it but there might be something...

I've carried out the test using v28.4 on nav search with each test being run for 15 times. Mostly a single sub with glen surrounded by five US TF at varying ranges between 1-4 hexes. From N to S the TFs were; 2 ship (DD, AO) at 4 Hex, 3 ships (CA, CL, DD) at 1H, 9 ships (CV, 4xCA, 4xDD) at 1H, 6 ships (CV, 2xCA, 3xDD) at 2H, 2 ship (DD, AO) at 3H.

I also searched from Truk and an enlarged Ontong Java. Here's there locations, Truk being 15 Hexes NW of the sub.
Screenshot 2025-10-07 093442.jpg
Screenshot 2025-10-07 093442.jpg (35.84 KiB) Viewed 42 times
I did have one at zero range but the TFs detected each other and attacked so scrubbed that idea.

All ships were set to remain on station with no destination set. Each test ran for 15 turns, yeah not many but I know but I did run about 50 odd test and it was enough to show how it worked.

As it turns out I was doing it wrong, at least with FPs. This was down to altitude. I tended to fly NS at 2-5K and this is wrong it needs to be above 5K for an effective search.

General observations
• Only NavS or ASW found anything. ASW seems just as effective as NavS but ASW is usually flown at 1/2K so height plays a part.
• The larger the TF the better the DR.
• Strange things can happen on the first turn.
• A spotted TF is easier to keep it spotted.
• A moving TF is harder to find and harder to keep spotted.
• If you're looking at the map and in the right place during execution phases you can see detected TF flash up on the screen. They might not stay for the orders phase.
• Enemy flying activity does not improve DR. Any form of combat they take part in however, can and mostly does.

Arcs v General searches
• Arcs work.
• Arcs only find TFs within their search sectors except for the 'visibility' thing. General searches find stuff all around.
• Arcs search further, going out to the max range. General searches are less than the max range.
• Arcs have a better DR in the sectors searched.
• Pilots appear to fly fewer general missions.

Height
• Flying NS <=5K has poor detection rates. Flying above 5K gives excellent detection rates.

Using a Glen the first 5 searches, between 0-3 hex range, carried out produced only 9 detections, less than 2 per turn and often just one. For the 6th test I went up to 11K and immediately got 14 detections and that was with a 2 hex range.

I got similar detection rates (DR) at 6K and 10K. I never test above 11K. As soon as I went below 6K DR dropped off dramatically.

Range
• DR are better at shorter ranges.
• Search range less than 2/3 an aircraft's normal range seems to work the best and the further you push it the more DR fall off.
• General searches appear to have a DR less than max range. Mostly one but at longer ranges, Emily at 18 for instance, it was two.
• Arcs searches further up to go max range but detect nothing past it.
• The 'visibility' thing resulted in detections up to two hexes from an aircraft's base no matter what range was set.

Using the Emily I did detect a 2 ship TF at 24 hexes during a single 15 turn test. Here are the figures for that test. (15 at 11 hex, 9 at 14, 14 at 16, 14 at 17, 7 at 24).

I did not exceed an aircraft's normal radius when setting max range, for a glen it's 3, a Jake 8 and an Emily 24.

Visibility
• Search AC appear to be able to see up to 2 hexes at heights above 5K, 1K below I think.

This is inline with real life when LOS at 6K is roughly 80 miles (2 hexes).

Not obvious when using a general search but it is when using arcs. This was shown over and over again when TFs were detected out of arc (often in the complete opposite direction) and particularly noticeable close to the point of take off.

Aircraft numbers
• More aircraft searching means higher DR.

Another obvious one. Even a single AC flown above 5K will find stuff. Patrol levels, lost or unserviceable aircraft and nember of pilots can all affect the numbers flying.
Setting 100% patrol level cripples an air group very quickly. Running at that rate for 6-7 turns can reduce a 12 strong AG to roughly half, carry on for 14 turns and you can expect to have only one often none available. Beware unserviceability.

I found 60% for continual use works, higher if you expect trouble and only run at 100% if you know were, when and from roughly what direction.

Weather
• Bad weather reduces DR

Perhaps not as dramatic as it should be but and don't expect a TF to go undetected in thunderstorms or to be detected in clear weather. Although area weather matters it's the hex weather that's important and these two are often not the same.

What I didn't see
• Automatic detection. There is no such thing except possibly between TF? Even TF in the same hex as an enemy bases can go undetected provided there's no combat. All bets are off once that happens. The size of the base doesn't matter.
• Flying any mission other than NavS or ASW find nothing. However if your watching the right part of the screen during execution they can flash up or just centre on activity.
User avatar
dr.hal
Posts: 3570
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:41 pm
Location: Covington LA via Montreal!

Re: Naval search

Post by dr.hal »

interesting observations, thanks for sharing.
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 14333
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

Re: Naval search

Post by btd64 »

I have used search arcs before. I find them useful....GP
Intel Ultra 7 16 cores, 32 gb ram, Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050

AKA General Patton

DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
WIS Manual Team Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 18242
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: Naval search

Post by RangerJoe »

It had previously been mentioned that 6k was the sweet spot for naval searching. Also, the larger the task force, the easier it is to spot at higher altitudes. Single ship TFs are the hardest to spot at higher altitudes.

I have had Devastators flying ASW at 1k and they have attacked enemy surface shipping. This was when they were protecting convoys going into harm's way. This was also against the AI so a human might have had their shipping done differently but my carriers were not on search and destroy missions. The VS SBDs were flying at 50% naval searches at 10k, with the rest of the VS and the VB units on naval strikes.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”