Kamikaze vs. Heavy Cruiser

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20409
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Kamikaze vs. Heavy Cruiser

Post by BBfanboy »

Here's an interesting pic that popped up on Facebook:
CA Sussex with Sonia Kamikaze imprint.jpg
CA Sussex with Sonia Kamikaze imprint.jpg (110.07 KiB) Viewed 174 times
Oh SNAP! Now we have to paint the bloody side again!
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 14338
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

Re: Kamikaze vs. Heavy Cruiser

Post by btd64 »

BBfanboy wrote: Thu Oct 09, 2025 3:12 pm Here's an interesting pic that popped up on Facebook:

CA Sussex with Sonia Kamikaze imprint.jpg

Oh SNAP! Now we have to paint the bloody side again!
I wonder if and what the damage was on the other side of the hull....GP
Intel Ultra 7 16 cores, 32 gb ram, Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050

AKA General Patton

DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
WIS Manual Team Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton
User avatar
Bo Rearguard
Posts: 670
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:08 pm
Location: Basement of the Alamo

Re: Kamikaze vs. Heavy Cruiser

Post by Bo Rearguard »

I recall reading that not a single well-armored surface combatant (cruiser or battleship) was ever seriously endangered by a kamikaze strike. The vast majority of the ships ultimately sunk by them being destroyers and landing ships. I guess that photo shows part of the reason why. There's a lot of kinetic mass there but no great penetrating power in that blunt radial engine.
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist ...." Union General John Sedgwick, 1864
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20409
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

Re: Kamikaze vs. Heavy Cruiser

Post by BBfanboy »

Bo Rearguard wrote: Fri Oct 10, 2025 11:05 am I recall reading that not a single well-armored surface combatant (cruiser or battleship) was ever seriously endangered by a kamikaze strike. The vast majority of the ships ultimately sunk by them being destroyers and landing ships. I guess that photo shows part of the reason why. There's a lot of kinetic mass there but no great penetrating power in that blunt radial engine.
BB Missouri had a similar but glancing aircraft hit against her armoured belt and suffered no damage other than the paint. Sussex's armour belt would be about 5" as opposed to 12" for Missouri, but the fact it was not dished in suggests the plane's bomb(s) did not explode against it. Perhaps it dropped the bombs and then got shot down, but with enough control to go kamikaze.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Bo Rearguard
Posts: 670
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:08 pm
Location: Basement of the Alamo

Re: Kamikaze vs. Heavy Cruiser

Post by Bo Rearguard »

BBfanboy wrote: Fri Oct 10, 2025 3:52 pm Perhaps it dropped the bombs and then got shot down, but with enough control to go kamikaze.
That's a strong possibility as that sort of desperate tactic had occurred previously in the war before kamikazes were a organized force. Another could be that because of the sporadic shortages of aerial munitions, kamikaze pilots were often instructed not to arm their bombs until the last minute, so that if they failed to find a suitable target, they could return to base without jettisoning the bombs. This led to a number of cases where in the existential stress of the moment the pilot forgot to arm his bombs and they did not explode on impact, making what might have been a lethal attack merely damaging.
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist ...." Union General John Sedgwick, 1864
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”