HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post here your best AAR
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

Ditto
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

AGS

Image
Attachments
AGS.jpg
AGS.jpg (196.92 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

JULY 18, 1941

The British advance in Tunisia, destroying an Italian Mountain corps.

Image
Attachments
Tunisia.jpg
Tunisia.jpg (119.7 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

But are too weak in Egypt to do anything but watch.

Image
Attachments
Egypt.jpg
Egypt.jpg (80.58 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

After 5 turns and despite numerous German attacks (many at 4:1 or less odds), the Russian National Experience level is still only at 31%. This does not bode well for Russian survival.

AGN

Image
Attachments
AGN.jpg
AGN.jpg (185.28 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

AGC. The Axis move to cut off the slow moving Russians in the Marshes. This is one problem with putting all units in garrison mode.

Image
Attachments
AGC.jpg
AGC.jpg (197.82 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

AGS. The Axis cross the Dneiper.

Image
Attachments
AGS.jpg
AGS.jpg (195.14 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

AUGUST 1, 1941

AGN.

Image
Attachments
AGN.jpg
AGN.jpg (147.94 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

AGC.

Image
Attachments
AGC.jpg
AGC.jpg (166.93 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

AGS. As expected the Axis isolate a number of Russian corps and this time even bag an army.

Image
Attachments
AGS.jpg
AGS.jpg (173.44 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

The British destroy another Italian mountain corps and close in on Tripoli.

Image
Attachments
Closingin..Tripoli.jpg
Closingin..Tripoli.jpg (120.2 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

AUGUST 15, 1941

AGN, The Axis close in on Leningrad.



Image
Attachments
AGN.jpg
AGN.jpg (133.84 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

AGC

Image
Attachments
AGC.jpg
AGC.jpg (196.68 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

AGS

Image
Attachments
AGS.jpg
AGS.jpg (170.73 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

I was planning on invading Benghazi but I botched it. I moved my bombardment fleet in first using both OPs. I them moved in my invading corps using only 1 OP. But because it joined the fleet in the same hex it was considered to have used both its OPs and so was ineligible to invade.

Image
Attachments
Bengazhi.jpg
Bengazhi.jpg (196.08 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
User avatar
sveint
Posts: 3837
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Glorious Europe

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by sveint »

Thanks for the AAR, always interesting to read.

I think you've garrisoned too many Soviet units.
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Flaviusx »

I don't see the problem here, with the number of garrisoned units. Especially doing it north of Vitebsk up to Leningrad along the swamps and rivers. This is a natural defense line. You shouldn't need to move much there.
WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
sveint
Posts: 3837
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Glorious Europe

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by sveint »

You are right, but you need to only use them on natural defense lines (not in the center).
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

ORIGINAL: sveint

Thanks for the AAR, always interesting to read.

I think you've garrisoned too many Soviet units.


I think everyone pretty much agreed that the Russians were too weak and as a result the game was unbalanced. To counter this Alvaro made two major changes:

1.The first was to double the PP cost of a unit switching from garrison to mobile mode. The effect of this was supposed to be to prevent the Axis from micromanaging this in order to have larger than historical numbers for Barbarossa. Yet somehow both MM and myself both managed to have the usual Axis forces ready (ie 13+ Axis mobile units) by May 41.

2. The second was to give garrisoned units an extra 2 Guns. The effect of this was supposed to be to cause more casualties and effectiveness loss for the invading Axis. So I am trying this to see if it works. So far it seems to me that my "garrisoned" Russians are not doing any better than MM's ungarrisoned units. And I believe I built a lot more infantry corps as well.

So I don't necessarily disagree with you, but the experiment goes on.
Robert Harris
Harrybanana
Posts: 4098
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Canada

RE: HB (Allies) vs MM (Axis) No MM for now.

Post by Harrybanana »

AUGUST 29, 1941

AGN. Rokossovsky is KIA and the Germans come close to isolating Leningrad.



Image
Attachments
AGN.jpg
AGN.jpg (194.9 KiB) Viewed 1071 times
Robert Harris
Post Reply

Return to “AAR”