divided HQ

[jeanbart_MF]

Is this a good idea: divide HQ in order to make easier the replacements all over the map ?

[rtrapasso]

ORIGINAL: jeanbart

Is this a good idea: divide HQ in order to make easier the replacements all over the map ?

don't think so - you only get the HQ benefits for the parent unit... you do get more support in other spots, which might help (marginally) for supplies, replacements, etc.

[jeanbart_MF]

thank you rtrapasso...[:(]

[AmiralLaurent]

It will be a little too easy... Anyway, dividing it and sending the parent unit to a rear base with a good supply path and the fragment to the frontline where its support squads will be useful may be a good idea. A bit gamey IMOO but it will work.

[rtrapasso]

ORIGINAL: AmiralLaurent

It will be a little too easy... Anyway, dividing it and sending the parent unit to a rear base with a good supply path and the fragment to the frontline where its support squads will be useful may be a good idea. A bit gamey IMOO but it will work.

According to the mods - you will not get the "HQ" benefit = i.e. - combat bonus for HQ planning for location, etc.

[USSAmerica]

All you should see from HQ fragments are the effects of having more support squads in the hex.  Not insignificant benefits, but maybe not worth the trouble of splitting/shipping, etc.

[treespider]

I split them into fragments all the time for the extra support. I don't consider it "gamey" as the HQ units represent the hundreds of individual units that are support that are not represented in the game...

[USSAmerica]

I wouldn't consider it gamey at all to split and sprinkle the HQ support squads around.