I have a dream. A simple dream really. It involves playing the Central Powers in GOA without getting my ass comprehensively handed to me. While I have had some success against reasonable competent players as the Entente, winning every engagement except when up against the dreaded Hjaco, I have never ever won a single game as the Central Powers except against the AI.
In short, I’m something of an incompetent in the Kaiser business. I have tried conservatively – getting squeezed slowely to death in 1917. I have tried an all-out attack on France resulting in me knocking her out only to have the Russians in Berlin in 1915. I have gone all out against Russia only to have the Americans mach into Vienna from the Balkans and Italy.
Occasionally I must confess I have entertained the thought that I may not be cut out for the role. But then I have always believed that defeat is a much better teacher the victory so by now I figure I must be getting to be something of a genius.
None the less, having exhausted all the traditional opening moves I getting desperate enough to try not one but two fairly high risk gambles. I expect The Banana was rather surprised to get the following message:

I can just imagine the reaction in London: Poor Kaiser Ulver, we always knew he wasn’t too bright but we never realised he was stark raving mad. Attacking his own side. What’s next? A German DoW on Austria?
Actually there is a method to the madness. While there are a number of fairly obvious drawbacks to an Entente Ottoman Empire – I’m sure the Banana is already plotting to have the Turks march into Berlin just to complete my humiliation. – There is one huge advantage:
As long as I don’t attack Benelux the BEF will not be released, ever. Obviously Britain will still enter the war and I’ll have to content with the Royal Navy and Air Force, while British laboratories are busy developing high-tech French tanks and everyone is fielding British-build guns and gorging themselves on Commonwealth grown wheat shipped on British ships.
Non the less I won’t be seeing British troops on the west front and I feel it may be worth the drawbacks. In any case I’m desperate knowing full well I have little chance of winning a traditional game against the experience of the Banana.
I have given some thought to whether this is a gamy exploitation of the rule but, on reflection, I don’t think so. In a situation where Germany respect Benelux neutrality and the Entente is perceived as the stronger military side on land – as they likely would be with the Ottoman and Italy firmly in their camp – I can easily imagine Britain deciding to content herself with committing her fleet and material resources to her allies but being unwilling to incur the social cost of expending millions of lives and mobilizing a conscripted army – I will, after all, still face a few British corps railed in from the Middle East and lots of British production lend-leased to her allies.
All in all I think this is a reasonable historical what-if.Admittedly not allowing the Greatest Sea power in the world to move by sea sounds a bit silly but I considered it representing political restrictions – No Entente Cordinale in this timeline?
Clearly a Central Power DoW vs the Ottoman in turn 1 has to be assumed to represent a different political lead-up to the war and not an actual German attack on the
Ottomans but that is a flight of fancy I find acceptable.