Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
OnWargaming
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Italy

Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by OnWargaming »

Hi all,

huda0816 and I are playing the Battle of the Marianas: Hakko Ichiu (one month to end) and we are willing to start the big campaign, I will play as Japanese even if I have no experience how to run the economy (and several other things to be honest [:D])


Andy Mac's Scenario 7
Turn cycle: 1 day
PDU: ON
Realistic R&D: ON
Historical First Turn: OFF

HRs:
Permanently restricted unit cannot cross national borders
Temporarily restricted unit must pay full PPs
Invasion: don't split a small unit in multiple hexes (fragments)

Turn 1: no new Allied TF creation and no orders to air and ground units outside China
Self imposed rules on turn 1: no Allied CV hunting, no Mersing gambit, one port attack and no very far invasions using the special TF movement bonus. My opponent never asked me anything, therefore I am the only one to blame!


Well, it will be a very long journey and I have no doubt it will be challenging, all my gaming time will be devoted to it but I really want to finish a campaign in what I think is one of the most beautiful piece of wargaming art.
We are playing together since September without any issues, same time zone, no pressure, good chance overall.

From here, secret file for my esteemed opponent!

Image
Attachments
Sisters.jpg
Sisters.jpg (103.09 KiB) Viewed 472 times
huda0816
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2021 7:43 am
Location: Austria

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by huda0816 »

I am allowed to make one last (and first) comment in this thread. So I wish my opponent good luck and an autowin in 1943.

As a JFB myself I was shocked that he wanted to play scenario 1 and without any of those tactics I would definitely use (mersing gambit I am looking at you).

I will do an AAR myself but that will start when I get my first turn.
User avatar
OnWargaming
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by OnWargaming »

So, why to start an AAR so early?
Because I need time to figure out what to do with all the Japanese stuff (Army, Navy, Air, production, logistic and warfare).
There are lot of infos on this forum and the game is complex enough that for a good understanding about a single topic you have to read several posts and AARs, moreover not all of them have the same quality and you have to learn which are useful or not.
I have started reading AARs to have a broad picture but tons of questions arose and eventually I got stuck by too many informations at once syndrome!

Reset, I switched method, I will learn by playing and in the hard way.


Strategy
At very high level I need to delay the Allied advance as long as possible and running my economy without issues.

How to translate these wishful thinkings in a pratical plan?
Oil and fuel are in shortcomings but I can find plenty of them in Sumatra and Borneo, my main objective will be to take Palembang and to create a safe shipping route to Japan (end date 30/12/41, plus another couple of weeks for tanker TF in place.)
The other important oil bases (Balikpapan, Medan, Miri, etc.) will follow the general advance.

Without further modifications I need 11300 HI points every day with the actual production (but I am going to change something), considering a very bad scenario where in 1944 I cannot transport enough oil anymore and my industry start to be bombarded, the following considerations are necessary:

Fuel: hard to have a sound number because ships usage is included, if I am already in this situation I would use my fleet in counterattack only, merchant and naval yards can be stopped if necessary, maybe vehicles and armaments can be reduced (maybe not), surely the air production must be always up, moreover I should be able to produce something for a while with my oil centers if I made a good job in the previous years (Tokyo will be the best air protected base of Japan).
In the first months the fuel will be go down for the naval operations and low production, but when all the convoys will be set I will try to move my fleet for what will be really important or necessary (I don't want to use the KB every day).

Oil: I will move more oil than fuel to Japan because I want the supply point created in the refinery process.
Moreover I will use another self imposed HR, only tankers for oil/fuel transfer (again my opponent told me to use AK as well when I want to), this create a new challenge, my TK/AO are more important than a BB and I don't have so many to spare (more when I will post about ship production).
Again no increment until the DEI will be secured.

Supply: For what I have read, it will be my main problem in the late game therefore I will take care of my stockpile since day one.
I will try to supply my units with the occupy territories productions if possible (plenty of xAK to use) and only few selected sites will be fortified/expanded.


HI: following the previous comment on supply, no crazy industry expansion, I am trading a short term goal for a long term one (hopefully!), I want to increment vehicles and aircraft productions but someone else has to be stopped or new territories occupied, anyhow I think a small increment in factories will be necessary.

I still don't have figure out exactly the final output but my logic is to increase both supply and HI every turn.

Resources: the only problem will be to haul them to Japan but fortunately I have all the xAK needed for the task.


Warfare: aside the mandatory territories to occupy, the next steps will be influenced by Allied strategy (of course), quality and quantity cannot be matched therefore I need to pick up my battles very carefully, if I can destroy Allied assets and postpone the inevitable advanced without losing my fighting naval force I will be doing good, in all other situations there are good chance that I am wasting resources.
So far we have played two small scenarios (one still on the way) and it wasn't possible to do trick moves, samll map, fixed units, clear objectives. It will be another thing to take in account during the game.

Looking from his side, I would not play a general retreat but I would commit my units to delay the Japanese advances, I think almost everything is expendable for the Allied and even a 1:2 ratio is still pretty good (especially for aircrafts).
Also he knows that I will use my TK/AO ships only, therefore they will be a gold target for his subs.

Long story short, I still don't know where to go in the second phase, a wild guess is the Pacific sector but his strategy and my overall success (or failure) could be change that.



Image
Attachments
March.jpg
March.jpg (34.11 KiB) Viewed 472 times
User avatar
OnWargaming
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by OnWargaming »

[center]Theatre of Operation part One[/center]

China
I like this sector, plenty of space for manoeuvring and tons of units to use.
Supply will be the main concern therefore I will try to grab all light/heavy industries as possible in the lower half of China.

After that will start the phase two, Sian and Langchow (NE), Kweiyang and Kunming (NW), of course a lot it will depend on his defence strategy and how good I will be chasing the Chinese units.

Mongol Garrison Army
Kweisui and Paotow can be taken therefore I will retreat if I will notice offensive movements by him, the 26th Div will help to clear out the area when available.
I am toying with the idea to threat Langchow using the road in the Gobi desert but I still have to understand if the supply network can handle this kind of manoeuvre, the cavalry brigades will act as scout units in this regard.

North China Area Army
Main task is to clear out the railroad hexes till Anyi and to take Yenan, a couple of divisions equivalent for this task should suffice, otherwise they will wait reinforcements when availabe.

1st Army
It will play an important role in the East, Loyang and Chengcha are the initial targets, about five divisions are allocated for the job. Unfortunately there are few JAAF units and even less level 2+ airfields to use for the offensive operations, I think I will improve the Loyang one when taken and I will buy out some BF and air groups from Manchukuo.

12th Army
The smaller one and with a big unit only, the 32nd Div will attack Kewiteh when free from garrison duty and will chase enemy units in the great valleys if still present.

11th Army
The biggest Army with six divisions tasked to take the four cities around the Zi River, Changsha will be the first target.
There are a lot of Chinese Corps around this area therefore I have to pay attention to keep my supply line open, Ichang and Sinyang are too exposed and can be encircle pretty easy, a general retreat towards more defensible positions will be issued to these units, moreover the RGC divisions are more useful to free up other important units from garrison duty.

13th Army
About three divisions when released and the main task is to capture Wenchow and to clear out the area in the South from Chinese units.
The rest of the Army has big garrison requirements to fulfil.

23rd Army
A defensive role at the beginning, when garrison units will releave elements of the 51st Division in the coastal cities and no Chinese offensive are underway, Wuchow will be the first target.
Again I don't want to send a division in the middle of Chinese units that can cut my supply lines.

According to this plan a big area in the middle of the China won't be under Japanese attention for the moment, a no man's land where the enemy units will be left unmolested, essentially the vast majority of clear hexes without bases worth to be taken now.
The cons are he can move his units for a concentrated attack, even if I think it would be a mistake without proper AT guns in clear terrain, or he can move away several units in better positions. Anyhow I don't think I will able to catch lot of them anyway.


Feel free to comment or give advices, I am the rookie player here! [:)]


Image
Attachments
Chinaplan.jpg
Chinaplan.jpg (917.73 KiB) Viewed 472 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17564
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by RangerJoe »

Sinyang can and should be held. It is in wooded terrain, the Chinese won't have a lot of supplies to attack with and if they use them that way, they will not repair devices with them. It is on the rail line to the north which you should be working on to clear the enemy out of those clear hex bases which produce supplies. Build up the forts and then the airfield if needed to operate fighters and light bombers for short distance airstrikes against enemy units in clear terrain.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
OnWargaming
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by OnWargaming »

Thanks for your comment and welcome!

I agree that Sinyang is useful, I have some unit prepped for it for later, but why do you think it is important to hold right now?

Until Chengcha is in Japanese hands it is a dead end, moreover the Allied player can divide a small corps to place along the railroad hexes (if he really wants to interrupt the rail connection).
At the moment there is only an infantry brigade with average experience, I need to reinforce the base with another brigade at least if I want to hold and I need to keep open the other hex connecting with Hankow.
According to my plan these brigades are necessary in other places and the RGC divisions are needed to free up the 21st Division at Shanghai.

Anyhow I see your point, wooded area with fort level 4, not so easy for the Chinese to take it. No need to invest resources later.


Uncivil Engineer
Posts: 1292
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:56 pm
Location: Florida, USA

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by Uncivil Engineer »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Sinyang can and should be held. It is in wooded terrain, the Chinese won't have a lot of supplies to attack with and if they use them that way, they will not repair devices with them. It is on the rail line to the north which you should be working on to clear the enemy out of those clear hex bases which produce supplies. Build up the forts and then the airfield if needed to operate fighters and light bombers for short distance airstrikes against enemy units in clear terrain.


I definitely agree with holding Sinyang AND clearing the rail line from Chengchow to Hankow. You will need that line to feed reinforcements and SUPPLY into your Changsha offensive. Without that rail line it will be slow and tough going.

The minor road through the desert to Lanchow won't really support an offensive up there. It will barely support one division. You can fly supply into Ningsia, but that won't be enough. He's not likely to use the road to flank you, for the same reason.



mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by mind_messing »

Regarding your industrial plans:

- HI is very rarely (if ever?) a bottleneck for the IJ. Supply is by far the critical point of failure for the IJ economy. There are plenty of examples of IJ players running out of supply in 1945, yet to see or hear of one running out of heavy industry points.

- Vehicles and Armaments points bear watching closely. It is often deceptive to many players, who see building and maintaining a large stockpile of both of these for most of the war as a over the top. However, worth keeping in mind the massive shift in gears come 1944 onwards, where losses combined with increased mobilisation and formation of new units sends the use of VEH and ARM points sky-high.

- Thinking longer term about your industry, worth keeping in mind that the pools can't be bombed. Banked merchant/naval shipyard points, aircraft engines and airframes exist is perfect safety from any Allied attacks. Worth factoring this in to any longer term production plans.

- Shipyard (both merchant and naval) production is worth reviewing. There are some real gems hidden in the build list, and some that are an absolute waste of time and effort.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17564
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by RangerJoe »

As far as Sinyang goes,why give up the base if you do not have to? It is not in clear terrain with massive forces nearby, unlike Ichang. If the enemy moves in, you can surround him. If he attacks you in a wooded base hex with forts while his ground forces are being . . .
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
OnWargaming
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by OnWargaming »

ORIGINAL: Uncivil Engineer

I definitely agree with holding Sinyang AND clearing the rail line from Chengchow to Hankow. You will need that line to feed reinforcements and SUPPLY into your Changsha offensive. Without that rail line it will be slow and tough going.

The minor road through the desert to Lanchow won't really support an offensive up there. It will barely support one division. You can fly supply into Ningsia, but that won't be enough. He's not likely to use the road to flank you, for the same reason.


Thanks and welcome!

Sinyang: do you think that until the railroad will be cleared (and Chengcha taken) is not possible to attack Changsha for luck of supply?

Lanchow: there is only a division and I am thinking to take this city by "a coup de main" if not held with enough forces.
Anyhow I understand that it is not a feasible approach for a serious offensive.
User avatar
OnWargaming
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by OnWargaming »

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

Regarding your industrial plans:

- HI is very rarely (if ever?) a bottleneck for the IJ. Supply is by far the critical point of failure for the IJ economy. There are plenty of examples of IJ players running out of supply in 1945, yet to see or hear of one running out of heavy industry points.

- Vehicles and Armaments points bear watching closely. It is often deceptive to many players, who see building and maintaining a large stockpile of both of these for most of the war as a over the top. However, worth keeping in mind the massive shift in gears come 1944 onwards, where losses combined with increased mobilisation and formation of new units sends the use of VEH and ARM points sky-high.

- Thinking longer term about your industry, worth keeping in mind that the pools can't be bombed. Banked merchant/naval shipyard points, aircraft engines and airframes exist is perfect safety from any Allied attacks. Worth factoring this in to any longer term production plans.

- Shipyard (both merchant and naval) production is worth reviewing. There are some real gems hidden in the build list, and some that are an absolute waste of time and effort.


Lot of comments, thanks!

Supply first, got it!

Vehicles and Armaments: ok, therefore I can think to increase the production later in the game (1943?) and no need to keep a large stockpile from the beginning.

Long term planning: right, this is my main concern for luck of experience, I just have a vague idea where to spend my limited resources.
My olistic approach will be small increments checking my overall losses and resources stockpile.


Naval/Merchant Shipyard points: my idea here was to keep them constantly close to the limits accelerating the most needed ships (of course several ones will be halted) and eventually to build what is possible until the Allied lockdown.
I am not sure building a stockpile here, of course I can be wrong [:D]

Edit: added a clarification on shipyards
User avatar
OnWargaming
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by OnWargaming »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

As far as Sinyang goes,why give up the base if you do not have to? It is not in clear terrain with massive forces nearby, unlike Ichang. If the enemy moves in, you can surround him. If he attacks you in a wooded base hex with forts while his ground forces are being . . .


Ok, I will check my garrsion plan and I will try to keep this base if not under heavy pressure, thanks!
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17564
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by RangerJoe »

Check when you get your Japanese armoured divisions, you will need vehicle and armament points for them. See when other units come in as well, they might also need devices costing vehicle and armament points. Check when your units upgrade, you will also need points for those as well as for device upgrades.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
OnWargaming
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by OnWargaming »

According to my understading so far, am I right saying that I don't have to pay the whole device cost of the units but just part of it?
I don't know how big is this part though.
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20288
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: OnWargaming

According to my understading so far, am I right saying that I don't have to pay the whole device cost of the units but just part of it?
I don't know how big is this part though.
On upgrades, my understanding is you get a credit for the returned device and a debit of points for the new device - so yes you only pay the difference between the two.

New devices come with a full price tag - until you take them off the lot!
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
OnWargaming
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by OnWargaming »

[center]Theatre of Operation Part Two[/center]

Burma
Another very important sector for cutting the supply bonus to the Chinese units, increasing the oil production with Magwe and using it as stepping stone for a further expansion to the India HI factories in the South.
I am torn about a South Pacific expansion (but I am finding more cons than pros, more later about it) and the Indian one.

Pros
With Malaya, Burma and DEI in Japanese hands I think to have enough supply and fuel to keep the offensive without using HI resources.
Another plus is the short travel time to feed my troops.
There are dozens of HI factories that can boost my production and my opponent will have to divert reinforcements in this sector.
Plenty of terrain suitable for my tank units.

Cons
Lot of ground to cover therefore I need to employ a very large part of my Army force and if the operations will go wrong can be a massive defeat.
More easy for him to bring reinforcements and supply in the sector.
If I cross Delhi (I guess) several Allied divisions will join the party for free.
If he will choice a general retreat as main strategy, this sector can be already reinforced by initial British/Indian divisions.
Easy for him building fortifications from day two.

Well, back to Burma for the moment.


15th Army
Two good divisions will start the offensive at very slow pace but they will be supported by 25th Army after Singapore will fall.
A long way before to see real action here.
Anyhow the first objectives will be Rangoon, Port Blair and Lashio.

3rd Air Division
A fighter Sentai (after Oscar upgrade) and short range bombers will assist the advance.


Image
Attachments
Burmaplan.jpg
Burmaplan.jpg (979.22 KiB) Viewed 474 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17564
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by RangerJoe »

If you go the Indian route and want to conquer the entire place, before crossing the "emergency reinforcement" line in India, have your invasion for Karachi and try to do that either first or at the same time that you cross the line.

You might want to read this thread:

Emergency Reinforcements--India/Socotra

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2616532
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
OnWargaming
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by OnWargaming »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

On upgrades, my understanding is you get a credit for the returned device and a debit of points for the new device - so yes you only pay the difference between the two.

New devices come with a full price tag - until you take them off the lot!


Thanks for joining the AAR.

And what about when new units will arrive as reinforcement? The full price as well?
User avatar
821Bobo
Posts: 2409
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:20 pm
Location: Slovakia

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by 821Bobo »

And what about when new units will arrive as reinforcement? The full price as well?

Yes, they come as shells and all the devices are created from the stockpile of manpower, armaments and vehicles.
User avatar
OnWargaming
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Under the Seas - Ale (J) vs Daniel (A)

Post by OnWargaming »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

If you go the Indian route and want to conquer the entire place, before crossing the "emergency reinforcement" line in India, have your invasion for Karachi and try to do that either first or at the same time that you cross the line.

You might want to read this thread:

Emergency Reinforcements--India/Socotra

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2616532


Interesting thread, thanks.

We can summarize in "go big or go home" [:D]
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”