Claudes
Nates
Oscars
Zeros
Zekes
Franks
Tojos
Is this correct?

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
ORIGINAL: niceguy2005
I am trying to learn the performance hierarchy of Japanese fighters. I am currently going on assumptions, but I would assume that the following is a list of planes from worst to best
Claudes
Nates
Oscars
Zeros
Zekes
Franks
Tojos
Is this correct?
![]()
The Tony is slighly better than the Tojo. Its armament is defently superior and makes heavy differences expecially when intercepting heavy bombers formations.
ORIGINAL: alfrake
The Tony is slighly better than the Tojo. Its armament is defently superior and makes heavy differences expecially when intercepting heavy bombers formations.
As the two are close in performance, is it a good idea to skip one model entirely?
ORIGINAL: Sneer
check climbing speed
Tojo as I remember is excellent interceptor
ORIGINAL: Gen.Hoepner
Tojos and Tonies aren't so similar IMHO. I've checked the results i'm having in my pbem with MC. At the same exp level the Tonies do a defenetly better job against his heaviests, while the Tojos seem to have more chances of engage in A2A with enemy fighters.
Against the 4Es seems that what counts most is the armament, while against other fighters speed seems to be the key.
I like to have both of them. Consider that the Tojo has a GREAT climb rate and can get the 4Es even when they fly at 36k ft....
So i usually keep the Tonies between 16,000 and 7,000 and the Tojos above 16k