Page 94 of 162
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm
by rkr1958
It helps to actual read the rules. I see that the surrender and transfer of Italian naval units on board, in production and repair pools was handled correctly.
I guess the issue is with Trieste and Pola and the rebase of the 2 SS divs out. I'm just going to go back just before surrender and address that, because I can see any reason those 2 div were force to relocate and the Italian CA forced to rebase.
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:47 pm
by Courtenay
rkr1958 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm
It helps to actual read the rules. I see that the surrender and transfer of Italian naval units on board, in production and repair pools was handled correctly.
Read the rules? I thought there was a rule against that somewhere.
rkr1958 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm
I guess the issue is with Trieste and Pola and the rebase of the 2 SS divs out. I'm just going to go back just before surrender and address that, because I can see any reason those 2 div were force to relocate and the Italian CA forced to rebase.
I suspect that MWiF is confused by the SS units. The divisions should have stayed where they were, and I think the Italian ship should've too.
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:16 pm
by Centuur
Courtenay wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:47 pm
rkr1958 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm
It helps to actual read the rules. I see that the surrender and transfer of Italian naval units on board, in production and repair pools was handled correctly.
Read the rules? I thought there was a rule against that somewhere.
rkr1958 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm
I guess the issue is with Trieste and Pola and the rebase of the 2 SS divs out. I'm just going to go back just before surrender and address that, because I can see any reason those 2 div were force to relocate and the Italian CA forced to rebase.
I suspect that MWiF is confused by the SS units. The divisions should have stayed where they were, and I think the Italian ship should've too.
The SS units should have stayed in place. That's a bug (and if that get fixed, the Italian ship will stay in Trieste).
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:48 pm
by Courtenay
Ethiopia should now be aligned to an Allied major power. I have seen MWiF get this wrong. Did it work correctly?
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:48 pm
by rkr1958
Courtenay wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:48 pm
Ethiopia should now be aligned to an Allied major power. I have seen MWiF get this wrong. Did it work correctly?
Below is what Ethiopia looks like post Italy's surrender. The 3 Terr & Italian div all disappeared. Would the opportunity to align take place during the first allied impulse of next turn?

- 99-East-Africa-Post-Italian-Surrender.png (1.79 MiB) Viewed 679 times
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:50 pm
by rkr1958
Centuur wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:16 pm
Courtenay wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:47 pm
rkr1958 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm
It helps to actual read the rules. I see that the surrender and transfer of Italian naval units on board, in production and repair pools was handled correctly.
Read the rules? I thought there was a rule against that somewhere.
rkr1958 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm
I guess the issue is with Trieste and Pola and the rebase of the 2 SS divs out. I'm just going to go back just before surrender and address that, because I can see any reason those 2 div were force to relocate and the Italian CA forced to rebase.
I suspect that MWiF is confused by the SS units. The divisions should have stayed where they were, and I think the Italian ship should've too.
The SS units should have stayed in place. That's a bug (and if that get fixed, the Italian ship will stay in Trieste).
I went back and fixed that through some magical editing.
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 8:58 pm
by rkr1958
Turn 23. May/June 1943. End of Turn.
Destroyed.

- 99-Destroyed.png (130.22 KiB) Viewed 667 times
Repair.

- 99-Dry-Dock.png (186.52 KiB) Viewed 667 times
BP Report.

- 99-BP-Report.png (69.93 KiB) Viewed 665 times
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:03 pm
by rkr1958
Turn 23. May/June 1943. End of Turn.
CP Losses.

- 99-CP-Losses.png (62.07 KiB) Viewed 664 times
Western Allied CP Losses Compared to Historical BOA Losses.
By Year.

- 99-BOA-by-year.png (23.26 KiB) Viewed 664 times
Cumulative.

- 99-BOA-cumulative.png (25.13 KiB) Viewed 664 times
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:07 pm
by rkr1958
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:15 pm
by rkr1958
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:25 pm
by rkr1958
Turn 23. May/June 1943. Italy Surrender. Transfer of Surface & Submarine Fleet.
Active Sub & Surface Fleet Joins Germany.

- 99-Italian-Sub-Fleet-Joins-Germany.png (264.6 KiB) Viewed 652 times
In Production, Repair, Construction Pools Join USA.

- 99-Italian-Fleet-Transfer-to-USA.png (432.66 KiB) Viewed 652 times

- 99-Italian-Fleet-Transfer-to-USA-2.png (39.75 KiB) Viewed 652 times
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:30 pm
by Courtenay
Ethiopia should have gone Allied in the conquest phase, after the Italian land and air units were removed from the game.
If it did not (and I have had trouble with this in the past), try declaring war on it with an Axis power next turn.
If you are using Option 47 ((Isolated reorganization) you may not reorganize isolated units. If you are not using that rule and the units can trace to oil, they can be reorganized.
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:12 am
by rkr1958
Courtenay wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:30 pm
Ethiopia should have gone Allied in the conquest phase, after the Italian land and air units were removed from the game.
If it did not (and I have had trouble with this in the past), try declaring war on it with an Axis power next turn.
If you are using Option 47 ((Isolated reorganization) you may not reorganize isolated units. If you are not using that rule and the units can trace to oil, they can be reorganized.
I am playing with isolated reorg. So the units that were isolated and traced to oil should NOT have been reorg?
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:15 am
by rkr1958
rkr1958 wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:12 am
Courtenay wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:30 pm
Ethiopia should have gone Allied in the conquest phase, after the Italian land and air units were removed from the game.
If it did not (and I have had trouble with this in the past), try declaring war on it with an Axis power next turn.
If you are using Option 47 ((Isolated reorganization) you may not reorganize isolated units. If you are not using that rule and the units can trace to oil, they can be reorganized.
I am playing with isolated reorg. So the units that were isolated and traced to oil should NOT have been reorg?
Apparently on closer inspection MWIF let me oil them but did NOT reorg them. They're still flipped, out of supply & isolated.
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:19 am
by rkr1958
Turn 23. May/June 1943. End of Turn.
(1) French Guyana Liberated and Returned to Free France.

- 99-French-Guyana-Liberated-Returned.png (1.3 MiB) Viewed 634 times
(2) China does NOT surrender to Japan.
(3) The Soviet Union does NOT surrender to Germany.
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:20 am
by rkr1958
Turn 23. May/June 1943. End of Turn.
Victory Totals.

- 99-VT.png (177.02 KiB) Viewed 633 times

- 99-VT-2.png (67.12 KiB) Viewed 633 times
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:23 am
by rkr1958
Turn 23. May/June 1943. Economics.
Report.

- 99-ECON.png (140.96 KiB) Viewed 631 times
Production (1/2).

- 99-Production-1.png (241.59 KiB) Viewed 631 times

- 99-Production-2.png (241.24 KiB) Viewed 631 times
Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:24 am
by rkr1958
Turn 23. May/June 1943. Economics.
Production (2/2).

- 99-Production-3.png (224.03 KiB) Viewed 630 times

- 99-Production-4.png (270.81 KiB) Viewed 630 times