GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

It helps to actual read the rules. I see that the surrender and transfer of Italian naval units on board, in production and repair pools was handled correctly.

I guess the issue is with Trieste and Pola and the rebase of the 2 SS divs out. I'm just going to go back just before surrender and address that, because I can see any reason those 2 div were force to relocate and the Italian CA forced to rebase.
Ronnie
User avatar
Courtenay
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:34 pm

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by Courtenay »

rkr1958 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm It helps to actual read the rules. I see that the surrender and transfer of Italian naval units on board, in production and repair pools was handled correctly.
Read the rules? I thought there was a rule against that somewhere. :)
rkr1958 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm I guess the issue is with Trieste and Pola and the rebase of the 2 SS divs out. I'm just going to go back just before surrender and address that, because I can see any reason those 2 div were force to relocate and the Italian CA forced to rebase.
I suspect that MWiF is confused by the SS units. The divisions should have stayed where they were, and I think the Italian ship should've too.
I thought I knew how to play this game....
User avatar
Centuur
Posts: 9074
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Hoorn (NED).

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by Centuur »

Courtenay wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:47 pm
rkr1958 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm It helps to actual read the rules. I see that the surrender and transfer of Italian naval units on board, in production and repair pools was handled correctly.
Read the rules? I thought there was a rule against that somewhere. :)
rkr1958 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm I guess the issue is with Trieste and Pola and the rebase of the 2 SS divs out. I'm just going to go back just before surrender and address that, because I can see any reason those 2 div were force to relocate and the Italian CA forced to rebase.
I suspect that MWiF is confused by the SS units. The divisions should have stayed where they were, and I think the Italian ship should've too.
The SS units should have stayed in place. That's a bug (and if that get fixed, the Italian ship will stay in Trieste).
Peter
User avatar
Courtenay
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:34 pm

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by Courtenay »

Ethiopia should now be aligned to an Allied major power. I have seen MWiF get this wrong. Did it work correctly?
I thought I knew how to play this game....
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Courtenay wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:48 pm Ethiopia should now be aligned to an Allied major power. I have seen MWiF get this wrong. Did it work correctly?
Below is what Ethiopia looks like post Italy's surrender. The 3 Terr & Italian div all disappeared. Would the opportunity to align take place during the first allied impulse of next turn?
99-East-Africa-Post-Italian-Surrender.png
99-East-Africa-Post-Italian-Surrender.png (1.79 MiB) Viewed 516 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Centuur wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:16 pm
Courtenay wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:47 pm
rkr1958 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm It helps to actual read the rules. I see that the surrender and transfer of Italian naval units on board, in production and repair pools was handled correctly.
Read the rules? I thought there was a rule against that somewhere. :)
rkr1958 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:40 pm I guess the issue is with Trieste and Pola and the rebase of the 2 SS divs out. I'm just going to go back just before surrender and address that, because I can see any reason those 2 div were force to relocate and the Italian CA forced to rebase.
I suspect that MWiF is confused by the SS units. The divisions should have stayed where they were, and I think the Italian ship should've too.
The SS units should have stayed in place. That's a bug (and if that get fixed, the Italian ship will stay in Trieste).
I went back and fixed that through some magical editing.
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. End of Turn.

Destroyed.
99-Destroyed.png
99-Destroyed.png (130.22 KiB) Viewed 504 times
Repair.
99-Dry-Dock.png
99-Dry-Dock.png (186.52 KiB) Viewed 504 times
BP Report.
99-BP-Report.png
99-BP-Report.png (69.93 KiB) Viewed 502 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. End of Turn.

CP Losses.
99-CP-Losses.png
99-CP-Losses.png (62.07 KiB) Viewed 501 times
Western Allied CP Losses Compared to Historical BOA Losses.
By Year.
99-BOA-by-year.png
99-BOA-by-year.png (23.26 KiB) Viewed 501 times
Cumulative.
99-BOA-cumulative.png
99-BOA-cumulative.png (25.13 KiB) Viewed 501 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Use Oil.
99-Use-Oil-CL.png
99-Use-Oil-CL.png (44.91 KiB) Viewed 500 times
Italy.
99-Use-Oil-Itlay.png
99-Use-Oil-Itlay.png (313.25 KiB) Viewed 500 times
Japan.
(1) Note that though isolated from supply ships and planes that returned to base to the NEI Tarakan and were reachable overland by the Balikpapan NEI oil point could be oiled.
(2) Is this correct? That is, can isolated units be oiled and reorg?
(3) Or do I need to retro fix if a bug?
99-Use-Oil-Japan.png
99-Use-Oil-Japan.png (350.26 KiB) Viewed 500 times
Not Oiled.
(4) Also includes inf div, which doesn't need oil, but is isolated and can't be reorg.
99-Use-Oil-Japan-Cannot-Oil.png
99-Use-Oil-Japan-Cannot-Oil.png (87.3 KiB) Viewed 500 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Complete Conquest of Italy

Moment of Surrender.
99-Conquest-Italy-Completely-by-CW.png
99-Conquest-Italy-Completely-by-CW.png (1.02 MiB) Viewed 494 times
99-Italy-Saved-BPs.png
99-Italy-Saved-BPs.png (199.85 KiB) Viewed 494 times
Post Surrender (After a little bit of fixing a couple or three things).
(1) Germany seizes Italy's gold reserves with a little help from sympathetic Italian Fascistic.
99-MTO-Italy-Post-Surrender.png
99-MTO-Italy-Post-Surrender.png (1.78 MiB) Viewed 492 times
99-Med-Post-IT-Surrender-Transfer-of-BPs.png
99-Med-Post-IT-Surrender-Transfer-of-BPs.png (206.19 KiB) Viewed 494 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Italy Surrender. Transfer of Surface & Submarine Fleet.

Active Sub & Surface Fleet Joins Germany.
99-Italian-Sub-Fleet-Joins-Germany.png
99-Italian-Sub-Fleet-Joins-Germany.png (264.6 KiB) Viewed 489 times
In Production, Repair, Construction Pools Join USA.
99-Italian-Fleet-Transfer-to-USA.png
99-Italian-Fleet-Transfer-to-USA.png (432.66 KiB) Viewed 489 times
99-Italian-Fleet-Transfer-to-USA-2.png
99-Italian-Fleet-Transfer-to-USA-2.png (39.75 KiB) Viewed 489 times
Ronnie
User avatar
Courtenay
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:34 pm

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by Courtenay »

Ethiopia should have gone Allied in the conquest phase, after the Italian land and air units were removed from the game.

If it did not (and I have had trouble with this in the past), try declaring war on it with an Axis power next turn.

If you are using Option 47 ((Isolated reorganization) you may not reorganize isolated units. If you are not using that rule and the units can trace to oil, they can be reorganized.
I thought I knew how to play this game....
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Courtenay wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:30 pm Ethiopia should have gone Allied in the conquest phase, after the Italian land and air units were removed from the game.

If it did not (and I have had trouble with this in the past), try declaring war on it with an Axis power next turn.

If you are using Option 47 ((Isolated reorganization) you may not reorganize isolated units. If you are not using that rule and the units can trace to oil, they can be reorganized.
I am playing with isolated reorg. So the units that were isolated and traced to oil should NOT have been reorg?
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

rkr1958 wrote: Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:12 am
Courtenay wrote: Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:30 pm Ethiopia should have gone Allied in the conquest phase, after the Italian land and air units were removed from the game.

If it did not (and I have had trouble with this in the past), try declaring war on it with an Axis power next turn.

If you are using Option 47 ((Isolated reorganization) you may not reorganize isolated units. If you are not using that rule and the units can trace to oil, they can be reorganized.
I am playing with isolated reorg. So the units that were isolated and traced to oil should NOT have been reorg?
Apparently on closer inspection MWIF let me oil them but did NOT reorg them. They're still flipped, out of supply & isolated.
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. End of Turn.

(1) French Guyana Liberated and Returned to Free France.
99-French-Guyana-Liberated-Returned.png
99-French-Guyana-Liberated-Returned.png (1.3 MiB) Viewed 471 times
(2) China does NOT surrender to Japan.

(3) The Soviet Union does NOT surrender to Germany.
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. End of Turn.

Victory Totals.
99-VT.png
99-VT.png (177.02 KiB) Viewed 470 times
99-VT-2.png
99-VT-2.png (67.12 KiB) Viewed 470 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. End of Turn. Global Maps.

Control.
99-GM-Control.png
99-GM-Control.png (138.71 KiB) Viewed 469 times
Units.
99-GM-Units.png
99-GM-Units.png (132.13 KiB) Viewed 469 times
Active Axis.
99-GM-Active-Axis.png
99-GM-Active-Axis.png (126.66 KiB) Viewed 469 times
Active Allied.
99-GM-Active-Allied.png
99-GM-Active-Allied.png (133.72 KiB) Viewed 469 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Economics.

Report.
99-ECON.png
99-ECON.png (140.96 KiB) Viewed 468 times
Production (1/2).
99-Production-1.png
99-Production-1.png (241.59 KiB) Viewed 468 times
99-Production-2.png
99-Production-2.png (241.24 KiB) Viewed 468 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Economics.

Production (2/2).
99-Production-3.png
99-Production-3.png (224.03 KiB) Viewed 467 times
99-Production-4.png
99-Production-4.png (270.81 KiB) Viewed 467 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30055
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: GW Counterfactual Take 3.

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Economic Plots.

Cumulative Gross BPs.
99-ECON-Cumulative-Gross-BPs.png
99-ECON-Cumulative-Gross-BPs.png (107.77 KiB) Viewed 465 times
Cumulative Net BPs.
99-ECON-Net-War-Production.png
99-ECON-Net-War-Production.png (115.47 KiB) Viewed 465 times
Gross BPs Per Turn.
99-ECON-Gross-BPs-Per-Turn.png
99-ECON-Gross-BPs-Per-Turn.png (110.99 KiB) Viewed 465 times
Net BPs Per Turn.
99-ECON-Net-BP-Per-Turn.png
99-ECON-Net-BP-Per-Turn.png (126.31 KiB) Viewed 465 times
Ronnie
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”