Search found 9 matches

by JasonGT
Thu Jul 14, 2005 4:25 pm
Forum: Gary Grigsby's World at War
Topic: Playing vs the AI at "impossible"
Replies: 3
Views: 52

RE: Playing vs the AI at "impossible"

<r> Well one thing I've noted is that if I take any territory in Western Europe Germany shifts all of its forces back to deal with my forces. No matter how small of a force it may be. The German AI does not seem to have a notion of proportion. So I've found that if I want a decent game against the ...
by JasonGT
Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:03 am
Forum: Gary Grigsby's World at War - Support
Topic: No Lend lease supply from WA
Replies: 11
Views: 486

RE: No Lend lease supply from WA

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: alfredtc<br/>
<br/>
Yes, the WA is play by AI. At normal level I receive 40 to 80 supply point per turn.
<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Actually for me, as of the 1.04 patch, I have yet to have the WA give supply to Russia in any game, normal, hard, whatever. I ...
by JasonGT
Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:01 am
Forum: Gary Grigsby's World at War
Topic: Spain
Replies: 38
Views: 427

RE: Spain

<r> A lot of people are complaining about invading Spain here, but I have to say I don't really care for the suggested solutions. Basically, I'm hearing people say they would like the game changed so that invading Spain isn't a no-brainer move, just a possible strategy. However, all of the ...
by JasonGT
Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:23 am
Forum: Gary Grigsby's World at War
Topic: Tac vs Heavy Bombers
Replies: 18
Views: 292

RE: Tac vs Heavy Bombers

<r> Actually Aletoledo, even as the WA I find that Tac-Bombers are all I need. Just bringing their range up to 3 is really all you need. 4 is candy, but 3 is high enough for the meat of what you need to do with them (see Maginot's comment about this). Beyond that, being able to get their Land attack ...
by JasonGT
Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:11 pm
Forum: Gary Grigsby's World at War
Topic: Tac vs Heavy Bombers
Replies: 18
Views: 292

RE: Tac vs Heavy Bombers

<r> <QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: MrQuiet<br/>

<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>Even so, since their movement is halved while transporting<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
That is incorrect.<br/>
You can transport up to full movement points either one infantry unit or 5 supply units. Of course if you go the ...
by JasonGT
Sun Jun 12, 2005 7:17 pm
Forum: Gary Grigsby's World at War
Topic: Tac vs Heavy Bombers
Replies: 18
Views: 292

RE: Tac vs Heavy Bombers

<r> Ignoring the seques into history arguments, and coming back to actual gameplay discussion... <E>:)</E><br/>
<br/>
You have a point about being able to move troops with HBs SeaMonkey. Actually not just Paratroopers, but being able to move regular troops too. Although I don't think that part ...
by JasonGT
Fri Jun 10, 2005 12:01 pm
Forum: Gary Grigsby's World at War
Topic: Tac vs Heavy Bombers
Replies: 18
Views: 292

Tac vs Heavy Bombers

<r> Hey Guys,<br/>
<br/>
Just wanted to run something I've noted after the 1.033 patch, a suggestion for the future, and get peoples opinions.<br/>
<br/>
Does any one else agree with me that Heavy Bombers basically got the short-end of the stick after that patch? The WA & Japan changes to them ...
by JasonGT
Tue May 31, 2005 1:30 am
Forum: Gary Grigsby's World at War
Topic: Ships retreating from ports
Replies: 14
Views: 212

RE: Ships retreating from ports

<r> Hey Joel,<br/>
<br/>
Yes, I realized that it had been changed to function as intended. I.e. was a "bug" fix and not a rule change. I was just disagreeing with you that it was a good rule <E>:)</E> I understand you feel its good as stands, and I didn't really expect to get anything changed, but ...
by JasonGT
Mon May 30, 2005 3:10 pm
Forum: Gary Grigsby's World at War
Topic: Ships retreating from ports
Replies: 14
Views: 212

RE: Ships retreating from ports

<r> I have to agree with this post. I understand that making the change in the patch was to stop the tactic of surround and take pearl harbor while ignoring the fleet in port. Probably perceived as "cheesy". But the problem here is that it is inconsistent with land forces. Any conceivable logic that ...

Go to advanced search