<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: golden delicious<br/>
<br/>
Transport levels need to be slashed (ironically, given the thread we're in) as they cause major and unrealistic traffic penalties.<br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
i agree with you for the other point<br/>
for this one you ...

i'd like to play one of the following

- fall grau (playtest)
- 2innorm
- dday scenario from bob cross
- korea 50

i'm open to something else but please no fite monster.

could be interesting
if you're still looking

ORIGINAL: Oberst_Klink

Why no WW1/WW2 scenarios? Fancy Korea perhaps, the 50s, not the modern one.

Klink, Oberst

i'd pick you for korea
sorry to somewhat hijack your thread burroughs

I have the same oppinion, TOAW is really fun when you play against a human opponent. Playing against the AI can be fun for some scenario but just for a while or to do some kind of tests. i'd prefer to see the game's engine to be completely revised before having a better AI.

some french players i know who just began playing the game would appreciate that kind of tools. I'm all for it, i just hope there will be some other major changes that are more than eye candy

<t> <br/>
depending on the situation.<br/>
<br/>
1)air dropping divided paratroopers on the last turn to grab high value VP hexes to win the game on the last turn of the game. If it's because your opponent didn't want to garrison the objectives but that he could have afford it then i consider the ...

<r>
<QUOTE><s>[quote]</s>ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay<br/>
<br/>
not something that actually occurs on a regular basis.<br/>

<e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE>
<br/>
Take any scenario where player 2 counter attack on a large scale for several turns and it's a nightmare for player 1 because of what Legun ...

Small to medium scenario.
i'd like to stick to a scenario which has seen serious playtesting.
i like WW2 but i'm fine with post WW2 as well.