Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

User avatar
String
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Estonia

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by String »

wtf?
Surface combat TF fanboy
Phatguy
Posts: 1348
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:08 pm
Location: Buffalo,ny

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by Phatguy »

Well, the game(demo) works on my crappy system..Others have said that they have problems.. Thankfully so far I havent.. It does look stupendous.I would buy it BUT.......yup a big but..The licensing thing gets on my nerves. Right now I stay home so it would not effect me too much but once I head back to work I would have serious issues with the 7 day call in. I work from 6 am to 6 pm..with a 4 hr break in the middle. Some days I head home, most days I stay  out with my laptop. If the 7 day call-in occurs when i'm out at work and it refuses to run because it cant find a internet connection I would be sorely pissed. I pay for it I should be able to play it whenever without worrying about a working internet connection!

I also dont really like them selling a barebones model(i think its only 19 scenarios) for roughly full price and overcharging for a full featured version with a campaign but that is thier perogative.They do have a niche product and they do have bills to pay  so this does not annoy me too much.

I really do think they are losing some customers due to thier licensing system but it seems they do not care.. Well, thats about 120 bucks that another wargame company got that would have gone to them for thier 2 games..Oh well....


My life is complete. 1000 Matrix posts.....
User avatar
Perturabo
Posts: 2461
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:32 pm
Contact:

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by Perturabo »

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

Indeed it has:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys ... fae84f05de#

And here's a look at their licensing "agreement:"

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys ... 7ea6421366#

PoE (aka ivanmoe)
It's completely insane. A "validation" every 7 days?
mikul82
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:02 pm

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by mikul82 »

ORIGINAL: Perturabo

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

Indeed it has:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys ... fae84f05de#

And here's a look at their licensing "agreement:"

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys ... 7ea6421366#

PoE (aka ivanmoe)
It's completely insane. A "validation" every 7 days?

Between the game developer being flat out hostile toward customers on their forum asking for assistance, and the core of fanboys screaming at anyone who questions the logic/safety behind the DRM, I wouldn't hand my money to that company for even the best game ever made.
User avatar
Erik Rutins
Posts: 39640
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by Erik Rutins »

Ok folks, please don't cross the line from constructive criticism into bashing. If you want to give feedback to SES, please post it in their official forums where they can respond.
Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC


Image

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.
mikul82
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:02 pm

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by mikul82 »

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

Ok folks, please don't cross the line from constructive criticism into bashing. If you want to give feedback to SES, please post it in their official forums where they can respond.

Didn't intend that as bashing, I'd think of shoddy treatment of customers to be a valid criticism of a company in any business.
User avatar
wworld7
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 2:57 am
Location: The Nutmeg State

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by wworld7 »

ORIGINAL: mlc82

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

Ok folks, please don't cross the line from constructive criticism into bashing. If you want to give feedback to SES, please post it in their official forums where they can respond.

Didn't intend that as bashing, I'd think of shoddy treatment of customers to be a valid criticism of a company in any business.

You have a point, and I agree it would be on a SES forum. Using a 3rd party forum (Matrix) it does not come out as contructive criticism. That is what I believe Erik meant.
Flipper
mikul82
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:02 pm

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by mikul82 »

ORIGINAL: flipperwasirish

ORIGINAL: mlc82

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

Ok folks, please don't cross the line from constructive criticism into bashing. If you want to give feedback to SES, please post it in their official forums where they can respond.

Didn't intend that as bashing, I'd think of shoddy treatment of customers to be a valid criticism of a company in any business.

You have a point, and I agree it would be on a SES forum. Using a 3rd party forum (Matrix) it does not come out as contructive criticism. That is what I believe Erik meant.

Figured it was relevant enough in a thread based on suggestions of whether to buy/not buy the game. No problem for me either way though.

I tend to think of "I don't recommend buying this product because this or that" as criticsm, while bashing is more "this company sucks! Don't buy from them!", just throwing blatant insults with no reasoning given.
Phatguy
Posts: 1348
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:08 pm
Location: Buffalo,ny

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by Phatguy »

Mic 82 is correct with what he says
My life is complete. 1000 Matrix posts.....
User avatar
SuluSea
Posts: 2396
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:13 pm

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by SuluSea »

I would buy both games but I prefer to own the games I purchase.
It is both offensive to me as a consumer and ridiculous to punish the paying customer for what a pirate may or may not do.

On topic I have no doubts Matrix would do a great job with Jutland, I'd like to see them remake HPS's Guadalcanal and Tsushima as well.[8D]

The customer service here is dare I say, second to none!
"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer
User avatar
TonyAAA
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:26 am
Location: Arlington, TX

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by TonyAAA »

ORIGINAL: apathetic lurker

Well, the game(demo) works on my crappy system..Others have said that they have problems.. Thankfully so far I havent.. It does look stupendous.I would buy it BUT.......yup a big but..The licensing thing gets on my nerves. Right now I stay home so it would not effect me too much but once I head back to work I would have serious issues with the 7 day call in. I work from 6 am to 6 pm..with a 4 hr break in the middle. Some days I head home, most days I stay  out with my laptop. If the 7 day call-in occurs when i'm out at work and it refuses to run because it cant find a internet connection I would be sorely pissed. I pay for it I should be able to play it whenever without worrying about a working internet connection!

I also dont really like them selling a barebones model(i think its only 19 scenarios) for roughly full price and overcharging for a full featured version with a campaign but that is thier perogative.They do have a niche product and they do have bills to pay  so this does not annoy me too much.

I really do think they are losing some customers due to thier licensing system but it seems they do not care.. Well, thats about 120 bucks that another wargame company got that would have gone to them for thier 2 games..Oh well....



I think the way the 7 day check thing happens is that it calls-in/checks EVERY time you run the game. If it can't connect, the game still works. If however, it can't connect and 7 days have passed since the last successful online check, then it won't work--at all.

What's amazing is that this is even more restrictive than Distant Guns (the worst DRM I've heard of till now.)

With Distant Guns, you had a 1-install limit and uninstalling doesn't give it back--you must remember to run a revoke tool. With Jutland, you also must have this semi-regular internet check-up.



Do Wargame pirates even exist?

My image of a game-pirate is more of a Gears of War/Madden playing, starving college student, not someone who'd be interested in a WWI fleet action game.


User avatar
06 Maestro
Posts: 3997
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: Nevada, USA

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by 06 Maestro »

About 2 years ago I had a PC disaster (from a trojan) which forced me to do a reformat-without backing up anything. I am normally diligent enough in backing up everything externally, so I figured I would be in good shape. I was able to reinstall all my programs and pictures, music, and all purchased downloaded programs, (including Matrix Games product's) except for 2 items. One of those 2 was Distant Guns. I don't recall the specifics anymore, but I can tell you I tried my best to recover the game. I had nothing saved for it elsewhere-which is very odd in itself. I just had to right it off.

This new info has rekindled the aggravation of loosing a game due to no fault of my own. Jutland is crossed off my list of possible purchases.
Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.

Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Lützow
Posts: 1521
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:09 pm
Location: Germany

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by Lützow »

Same for me, I got already displeased as the demo demanded to enter my email.

When I purchase a book, movie, boardgame, videogame etc. I consider it as my personal asset and it has to be in my sole discretion whatever I do with it - as long as I don't make copies for commercial purpose for sure. However, DRM schemes are shifting control from me toward contractor, dictating how I have to use something I payed for. Even it won't hurt my system in any way, I'm not willing to accept this as a matter of principle. It's like I would purchase a car and had to ask for permission every time I'm going to drive.
User avatar
Hertston
Posts: 3317
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2002 3:45 pm
Location: Cornwall, UK

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by Hertston »

I'm not 'bashing' anybody but, just in case anyone from Storm Eagle should pass by, it is because of the DRM that I will not be purchasing this title that I otherwise would have done. For all I know I, and the previous posters, are the only people to whom that applies. But somehow I doubt it.
Phatguy
Posts: 1348
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:08 pm
Location: Buffalo,ny

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by Phatguy »

ORIGINAL: Tony_A
ORIGINAL: apathetic lurker

Well, the game(demo) works on my crappy system..Others have said that they have problems.. Thankfully so far I havent.. It does look stupendous.I would buy it BUT.......yup a big but..The licensing thing gets on my nerves. Right now I stay home so it would not effect me too much but once I head back to work I would have serious issues with the 7 day call in. I work from 6 am to 6 pm..with a 4 hr break in the middle. Some days I head home, most days I stay  out with my laptop. If the 7 day call-in occurs when i'm out at work and it refuses to run because it cant find a internet connection I would be sorely pissed. I pay for it I should be able to play it whenever without worrying about a working internet connection!

I also dont really like them selling a barebones model(i think its only 19 scenarios) for roughly full price and overcharging for a full featured version with a campaign but that is thier perogative.They do have a niche product and they do have bills to pay  so this does not annoy me too much.

I really do think they are losing some customers due to thier licensing system but it seems they do not care.. Well, thats about 120 bucks that another wargame company got that would have gone to them for thier 2 games..Oh well....



I think the way the 7 day check thing happens is that it calls-in/checks EVERY time you run the game. If it can't connect, the game still works. If however, it can't connect and 7 days have passed since the last successful online check, then it won't work--at all.

What's amazing is that this is even more restrictive than Distant Guns (the worst DRM I've heard of till now.)

With Distant Guns, you had a 1-install limit and uninstalling doesn't give it back--you must remember to run a revoke tool. With Jutland, you also must have this semi-regular internet check-up.



Do Wargame pirates even exist?

My image of a game-pirate is more of a Gears of War/Madden playing, starving college student, not someone who'd be interested in a WWI fleet action game.



Yeah, thats how I see it too, but when I get home I never touch my laptop and a lot times leave it at work as I cant be bothered lugging that beast back and forth. So the only time it's on is during those 4 hours or on those rare occasions schools are closed giving me a 3 day weekend. So sometimes it does not see an internet connection for weeks on end with an average of about 3 weeks between connections.

Plus,while I dont wish to bash any company that makes products I enjoy, thier CS is the worst I have ever seen. I have never seen a owner being so rude to a customer(not me) who had some issues with the DRM and was asking some questions..

Yes, pirates for Wargames exist, but as someone mentioned elsewhere, they tend to crack it just for the challenge. Matrix games are out there.I believe that they arent widely downloaded as most of those who are interested in the topic know how much of a niche product it is and wish to keep it going. And those who do dl those pirated versions are probably those who would not purchase a legit copy for financial or other reasons.
My life is complete. 1000 Matrix posts.....
Grell
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 8:16 pm
Location: Canada

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by Grell »

I would never buy a game from those people, that kind of copy protection is ludicrous.

Regards,

Grell
User avatar
Prince of Eckmühl
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by Prince of Eckmühl »

Without regard to the publisher in question, I will not pay for a game that doesn't, thereafter, belong to me. And I find myself somewhat startled by anyone who suggests that I should. I am a collector of games. It is an end in itself. The one, sure-fire way to lose my business is to enter into some smart-ass licensing gimmick aimed at depriving me of ownership of that for which I paid. If that strikes anyone as old-fashioned, or out-of-step with the times, then fine. My money will just stay in my pocket.

PoE (aka ivanmoe)
Government is the opiate of the masses.
User avatar
Greybriar
Posts: 1158
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:54 am

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by Greybriar »

That pretty much sums it up for me, too, PoE (aka ivanmoe). I also collect PC games (although I would rather play them).
This war is not about slavery. --Robert E. Lee
User avatar
Perturabo
Posts: 2461
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:32 pm
Contact:

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by Perturabo »

ORIGINAL: Tony_A

Do Wargame pirates even exist?

My image of a game-pirate is more of a Gears of War/Madden playing, starving college student, not someone who'd be interested in a WWI fleet action game.
Or someone from a third world country that isn't happy to pay (work) 12-4 times more for a digital copy of a product (a game) than someone with a same job who happens to live in the rich west.
Missouri Rebel
Posts: 111
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:46 pm

RE: Suggestion - Battle of Jutland

Post by Missouri Rebel »

Well I will NEVER EVER buy a game with any kind of E-License or gimmick regardless of pirates that 'just happen' to live in a turd world country that cannot develop into a civilization where workers are paid decent wages to survive and are usually the byproduct of corrupt government officials, even if the life I am enjoying was brought about by my forefathers hard work, diligence, innovation and hunger to achieve.

I myself will continue to work hard and PURCHASE the games I want that do not include these things. In today's economy sacrifices will be made. One day it might just be my internet. Then what happens to my PURCHASE?

Please excuse my spelling as I am in a rush (Yeah, I 'just happen' to have a heavy workload again today)

mo reb


We must act... against the Sioux, even to the extermination of men, WOMEN and CHILDREN.The more Indians we can kill this year, the less will have to be killed next year. They all have to be killed or be maintained as a species of paupers.- w.t. SHErMAN
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”