What does AI mean to you?

[Aurelian]

Ohh, Ohh, Allen Iverson.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_Iverson

[aaatoysandmore]

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

Ohh, Ohh, Allen Iverson.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_Iverson

Were there computers before Roswell?

[Chickenboy]

For a poultry veterinarian, this is confusing.

My first thought regarding what "AI" means? Avian influenza. Artificial insemination is frequently used in the industry as well-that runs a close second.

[Franciscus]

ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus

ORIGINAL: Franciscus
I personally have had lots of fun using some simple scripts- and an advanced form of "scripts" developed by Pocus ("Agents")- in HAN scenarios and some of AJE and PAR scenarios too - if you play against Hannibal "AI" in the second punic war scenarios you can expect the AI to be able to mount a proper Italy invasion across the Alps, which was something the "generic" coded AI never did (probably because it deemed it a completely crazy move [:D]) and to have a "plan" of what to do and how to do it once he gets to Italia [;)]

And these scripts are public? Care to provide a link, please? [:)]

I usually play the 216 B.C scenario (after Cannae) as Rome, obviously. I would try to stop the Punic juggernaut trashing everything after the crossing of the Alps.

Hi again

Reading again your post I may have explained myself wrongly. The scripts and agents I worked on in the AJE games, together with the rest of the team, ARE already present and active in the games, with latest patche(s)

Regards

[TulliusDetritus]

ORIGINAL: Franciscus
The scripts and agents I worked on in the AJE games, together with the rest of the team, ARE already present and active in the games, with latest patche(s)

Regards

And I certainly did not install yet this latest patch (v 1.05 released in october 2015) [:)]

Many many thanks [&o][&o] I was using the 216 B.C. scenario because I wanted to make sure 1) Hannibal made it to the central part of Italy and 2) he annihilated the two Consuls' Armies

Hannibal Ad Portas!!

[Recognition]

AI = Annoying Intelligence...Well not always, and it depends on how seriously we play the games I suppose and what settings.

One things for sure, the AI will get better and better to a point where we simple humans might end up being out witted at every turn

[aaatoysandmore]

ORIGINAL: Rush

AI = Annoying Intelligence...Well not always, and it depends on how seriously we play the games I suppose and what settings.

One things for sure, the AI will get better and better to a point where we simple humans might end up being out witted at every turn

That's a dream I don't think I'll live to see sadly. [:(]

[TulliusDetritus]

ORIGINAL: aaatoysandmore

ORIGINAL: Rush

AI = Annoying Intelligence...Well not always, and it depends on how seriously we play the games I suppose and what settings.

One things for sure, the AI will get better and better to a point where we simple humans might end up being out witted at every turn

That's a dream I don't think I'll live to see sadly. [:(]

Cheer up! You won't see this A.I. and the machines taking over the world either! The Schwarzeneggeresque 1984 Terminator was just the apéritif [8D]

*Nostradamus Mode off*

[E]

I still think Stephen Hawking is right on the money regarding A.I.

However, I think The Operational Art of War (TOAW) nailed the situation perfectly by referring to it as the "Programmed Opponent" (PO) when applied to/in a game.