Battle of Britain
Moderator: maddog986
Battle of Britain
My ambition from this post is to settle once and for all - and it is an ambitious ambition. Which was better Spitfire or 109? Hurricanes can also be considered but not 110s. This should be considered without radio direction finding, Dowding, tactics, Spanish civil war experience and solely on the aircraft performance. Which one was best?
RE: Battle of Britain
It depends upon what you mean by best.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”


- Shellshock
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
- Location: U.S.
RE: Battle of Britain
Good luck. [:D]ORIGINAL: MickM2
My ambition from this post is to settle once and for all - and it is an ambitious ambition.
If you do settle it, maybe you can move on to settle the eternal Yamato class vs Iowa class debate.
RE: Battle of Britain
Best in its widest terms.
RE: Battle of Britain
At what point in the development?
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”


RE: Battle of Britain
Battle of Britain. And I don't mean that in a disrespectful way. Britain was on its knees and the crux between us falling I believe was the Spitfire but if on a 1 on 1 the 109 was better then I will change my opinion.
RE: Battle of Britain
Are you referring to a twisting dogfight on a horizontal plane or a vertical one with the dive?
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”


RE: Battle of Britain
Maybe I should have asked this question a few gears ago when the veterans were still alive.
RE: Battle of Britain
Well, if the Hurricane or Spitfire tried to dive after a Bf109, the 109 would get away since the Merlin engine would die until a different carb was installed. But in a twisting, turning dogfight on a horizontal plane, the Spitfire could out turn a 109 but that also depended upon the pilot. For some reason, Douglas Bader was able to turn very tight without the G-forces pulling the blood to his legs. The Hurricane developed into other aircraft but it was a more stable gun platform and easier to fly.
But then again, it also depended upon the propeller.
But then again, it also depended upon the propeller.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”


RE: Battle of Britain
Wow it gets complicated for my small brain.
RE: Battle of Britain
A quarter of the pilots were from overseas. And they all contributed so there are probably many other factors to the final battle than the Spitfire.
RE: Battle of Britain
If you want to know what may have been the difference between the RAF winning or losing the Battle of Britain, here is "Bloody Foreigners" on youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptijNcDanVw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptijNcDanVw
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”


RE: Battle of Britain
warspite1ORIGINAL: MickM2
..... so there are probably many other factors to the final battle than the Spitfire.
The performance of the Spitfire and Hurricane vs the Bf-109 were of course important to the final outcome of the battle, but yes, there were a great many factors that went into the ultimate result.
But if you want, as stated, a comparison between the Spitfire I and the Bf-109-E1/4 to know which was the better aircraft then you are best off doing just that. Don't bring the wider battle into it (as indeed you suggested at the outset).
Now Maitland, now's your time!
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
RE: Battle of Britain
Yay well done the Poles. Dziekuje ci.
RE: Battle of Britain
The next time you hoist a pint, say "Na zdrowie" and remember them.
But they were also flying Hurricanes. They shot down a lot more 109s than they lost. The difference was their training.
There is also a movie "Hurricane" about them.
There is also a movie about a "sergeant Wojtek" in the Polish Army. He enjoyed his wine and beer. He was excellent on guard duty as well. He was NOT Polish. After the war, he was a hit with the children in one Scottish village. But then, well, you could kinda, sorta, say that he went to jail.
But they were also flying Hurricanes. They shot down a lot more 109s than they lost. The difference was their training.
There is also a movie "Hurricane" about them.
There is also a movie about a "sergeant Wojtek" in the Polish Army. He enjoyed his wine and beer. He was excellent on guard duty as well. He was NOT Polish. After the war, he was a hit with the children in one Scottish village. But then, well, you could kinda, sorta, say that he went to jail.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”


- MrsWargamer
- Posts: 1653
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 4:04 pm
RE: Battle of Britain
I think the deciding detail was they let up on the airfields.
The Spitfire was great, didn't need to worry about range. The 109 was great, but it had to worry about range. Not easy to dogfight when you have no fuel.
The spitfire just had to intercept and shoot shit down. The 109 had to protect the bombers. Mission requirements impact how you fight. If they had not switched to London, I dare say it wouldn't have mattered very soon how great the spitfire was.
The Spitfire was great, didn't need to worry about range. The 109 was great, but it had to worry about range. Not easy to dogfight when you have no fuel.
The spitfire just had to intercept and shoot shit down. The 109 had to protect the bombers. Mission requirements impact how you fight. If they had not switched to London, I dare say it wouldn't have mattered very soon how great the spitfire was.
Wargame, 05% of the time.
Play with Barbies 05% of the time.
Play with Legos 10% of the time.
Build models 20% of the time
Shopping 60% of the time.
Exlains why I buy em more than I play em.
Play with Barbies 05% of the time.
Play with Legos 10% of the time.
Build models 20% of the time
Shopping 60% of the time.
Exlains why I buy em more than I play em.
- IslandInland
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 3:54 pm
- Location: YORKSHIRE
- Contact:
RE: Battle of Britain
ORIGINAL: MickM2
My ambition from this post is to settle once and for all - and it is an ambitious ambition. Which was better Spitfire or 109? Hurricanes can also be considered but not 110s. This should be considered without radio direction finding, Dowding, tactics, Spanish civil war experience and solely on the aircraft performance. Which one was best?
Spitfire.
The Few won.
Beta Tester for:
War In The East 2 & Steel Inferno Expansion
War In The West Operation Torch
Strategic Command American Civil War
Strategic Command WWII: War in the Pacific
XXXCorps
1941 Hitler's Dream Scenario for WITE 2
War In The East 2 & Steel Inferno Expansion
War In The West Operation Torch
Strategic Command American Civil War
Strategic Command WWII: War in the Pacific
XXXCorps
1941 Hitler's Dream Scenario for WITE 2
- IslandInland
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 3:54 pm
- Location: YORKSHIRE
- Contact:
RE: Battle of Britain
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
The next time you hoist a pint, say "Na zdrowie" and remember them.
But they were also flying Hurricanes. They shot down a lot more 109s than they lost. The difference was their training.
There is also a movie "Hurricane" about them.
There is also a movie about a "sergeant Wojtek" in the Polish Army. He enjoyed his wine and beer. He was excellent on guard duty as well. He was NOT Polish. After the war, he was a hit with the children in one Scottish village. But then, well, you could kinda, sorta, say that he went to jail.
^
Also this.
Hurricanes outnumbered Spits.
The Battle of Britain was won by pilots not planes.
Beta Tester for:
War In The East 2 & Steel Inferno Expansion
War In The West Operation Torch
Strategic Command American Civil War
Strategic Command WWII: War in the Pacific
XXXCorps
1941 Hitler's Dream Scenario for WITE 2
War In The East 2 & Steel Inferno Expansion
War In The West Operation Torch
Strategic Command American Civil War
Strategic Command WWII: War in the Pacific
XXXCorps
1941 Hitler's Dream Scenario for WITE 2
RE: Battle of Britain
ORIGINAL: IslandInland
ORIGINAL: MickM2
My ambition from this post is to settle once and for all - and it is an ambitious ambition. Which was better Spitfire or 109? Hurricanes can also be considered but not 110s. This should be considered without radio direction finding, Dowding, tactics, Spanish civil war experience and solely on the aircraft performance. Which one was best?
Spitfire.
The Few won.
The Spitfire and the Hurricane.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”


RE: Battle of Britain
ORIGINAL: IslandInland
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
The next time you hoist a pint, say "Na zdrowie" and remember them.
But they were also flying Hurricanes. They shot down a lot more 109s than they lost. The difference was their training.
There is also a movie "Hurricane" about them.
There is also a movie about a "sergeant Wojtek" in the Polish Army. He enjoyed his wine and beer. He was excellent on guard duty as well. He was NOT Polish. After the war, he was a hit with the children in one Scottish village. But then, well, you could kinda, sorta, say that he went to jail.
^
Also this.
Hurricanes outnumbered Spits.
The Battle of Britain was won by pilots not planes.
It was more than just the pilots. The air crew, the ground support, the command echelon, the production people, and others. But it was a combination of the right people and the right equipment.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”

