Junk thread-pls ignore

[Zorch]

ORIGINAL: Lecivius

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Lecivius




And I agree with what he said.

But what about what *they* said?

I only care about what 'He' said [:'(]

I'll ignore what he's ignoring.

[Chickenboy]

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: Lecivius

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy




But what about what *they* said?

I only care about what 'He' said [:'(]

I'll ignore what he's ignoring.

I don't care about that. I'm too busy ignoring what *they* are ignoring.

[Lecivius]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: Lecivius




I only care about what 'He' said [:'(]

I'll ignore what he's ignoring.

I don't care about that. I'm too busy ignoring what *they* are ignoring.

But not what 'He' is ignoring.

[Chickenboy]

ORIGINAL: Lecivius

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Zorch



I'll ignore what he's ignoring.

I don't care about that. I'm too busy ignoring what *they* are ignoring.

But not what 'He' is ignoring.

No. Not unless they're ignoring the same thing. Then, in that case, yes. I think.

What were we talking about again?

[Zorch]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Lecivius

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy




I don't care about that. I'm too busy ignoring what *they* are ignoring.

But not what 'He' is ignoring.

No. Not unless they're ignoring the same thing. Then, in that case, yes. I think.

What were we talking about again?

How many replies can we get within-the-quote-box before the web site blows up?

[Chickenboy]

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Lecivius




But not what 'He' is ignoring.

No. Not unless they're ignoring the same thing. Then, in that case, yes. I think.

What were we talking about again?

How many replies can we get within-the-quote-box before the web site blows up?

At least one more. This one oughta do it?

[Zorch]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy




No. Not unless they're ignoring the same thing. Then, in that case, yes. I think.

What were we talking about again?

How many replies can we get within-the-quote-box before the web site blows up?

At least one more. This one oughta do it?

Just one more straw on the camel's back...

[Chickenboy]

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Zorch



How many replies can we get within-the-quote-box before the web site blows up?

At least one more. This one oughta do it?

Just one more straw on the camel's back...

Obviously, you can't do anything right, Zilch.

THIS one was the one to do it. Oughta blow things up-REAL GOOD!

[Zorch]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy




At least one more. This one oughta do it?

Just one more straw on the camel's back...

Obviously, you can't do anything right, Zilch.

THIS one was the one to do it. Oughta blow things up-REAL GOOD!

You're right! How did you know?

[Lecivius]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
What were we talking about again?

[Zap]

Please can we get this thread back on track OP wants to be ignored.

[Crossroads]

This all reminds me of an old Krazy Kat classic, a strip where there's two mockingbirds, *seemingly* not doing anything.

*The* question was, and remains: were the both mockingbirds actively ignoring this thread?

Or was it the first mockingbird ignoring this, and the second one instead just imitating the first one in ignoring all this?

We might never know [&:]

Which is why I am ignoring it.

[Orm]

ORIGINAL: Zap

Please can we get this thread back on track OP wants to be ignored.

No, I do not think so. If he wanted to be ignored then he wouldn't have claimed that the statement was garbage. Junk, as I understand it is garbage? And if the ignore statement was garbage then it shouldn't be ignored. Hence the thread is already on the projectory that the OP wanted.

[Zap]

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: Zap

Please can we get this thread back on track OP wants to be ignored.

No, I do not think so. If he wanted to be ignored then he wouldn't have claim that the statement was garbage. Junk, as I understand it is garbage? And if the ignore statement was garbage then it shouldn't be ignored. Hence the thread is already on the projectory that the OP wanted.

Oh Orm, you like to stir the pot don't you[:D]. But sir to call the following posts garbage! them is fightin words.

[Orm]

ORIGINAL: Zap

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: Zap

Please can we get this thread back on track OP wants to be ignored.

No, I do not think so. If he wanted to be ignored then he wouldn't have claim that the statement was garbage. Junk, as I understand it is garbage? And if the ignore statement was garbage then it shouldn't be ignored. Hence the thread is already on the projectory that the OP wanted.

Oh Orm, you like to stir the pot don't you[:D]. But sir to call the following posts garbage! them is fightin words.

I am so sorry. I stand corrected. I had no intention to offend someone. I hope you can forgive me. Those posts are clearly junk.

I hope we are all good now. [:)]

[Chickenboy]

Stirring the pot? What's for lunch? Smells good!

[Zap]

spam

Gallina de madre



spam ramen burger


musubi

[Zorch]

ORIGINAL: Zap

spam

Food porn. Thanks for reminding me to eat lunch.

[Crossroads]

ORIGINAL: Zorch

Food porn. Thanks for reminding me to eat lunch.

Please ignore your lunch.