A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 14514
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by Curtis Lemay »

Buckrock wrote: Sat Dec 10, 2022 6:19 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sat Dec 10, 2022 5:40 pm
Buckrock wrote: Sat Dec 10, 2022 6:21 am

All I'm saying is that the only historical example we have did not follow the above. Enterprise still had 2/3s of her aircraft aboard when she got to Pearl.
The examples of the peace time SOP can be referenced. Even your quora "experts" mentioned it.

When the Enterprise got to PH on the historical Dec 8th "with aircraft aboard", it was wartime and under emergency conditions. When the USN CVs in your scenario enter port before your raid, it will be peace time conditions and that SOP means the flyable aircraft from their CAGs are landed at Luke Field.
Again, the only data point we have is the one in which the Enterprise sailed into Pearl with 2/3rds of it aircraft on board. I don't care what the "SOP" was. What matters is how tightly they followed it. Right now we only have the one data point, and it doesn't fit your claim. It would take dozens more to establish the compliance rate. And why would the "SOP" change between peacetime and wartime?
Curtis Lemay wrote: Here's the link to the raid on Clark Field:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Clark_Field

Remember: This was 9 hours after Pearl. It's the only contemporary evidence of US readiness immediately post Pearl.
I know the historical details. I also know what the US aircraft had been doing all morning in anticipation of a raid that the Japanese would have attempted had weather not intervened. As I said, lay out some proper details for your PH raid plan and I'll be happy to discuss it.
It doesn't matter whatever excuse you want to make for how they got into the situation that resulted. What matters is what actually happened. It illustrates how unready for war they were at that time of the war.
Curtis Lemay wrote: The US has just been stunned by Pearl Harbor. That's all the Japs need to get into position on Maui.
And yet during the historical PH Raid, Maui was alerted, actively moving to defend itself and was able to receive and respond to direct orders from PH. Being stunned doesn't mean being comatose. Put forward the requested details regarding Maui and we can discuss it.
Maui will be infiltrated at night on a weekend in peacetime guided by pathfinders to all critical targets. The surprise attack will come from the interior of the island - in the rear of the island assets. They will be heavily outnumbered.

This is a low risk operation (even total failure only risks two battalions and two air groups) with a huge reward: TWO YEARS delay in US response. A no brainer.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 14514
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by Curtis Lemay »

warspite1 wrote: Sat Dec 10, 2022 8:02 pm The point of no return is LONG before the raid. You are saying Japan's decision to go to war or not rests on the fate of 48 Bettys.....
No it isn't. The Bettys have a range of 3749 miles and Maui is only 2813 from Eniwetok. So, 2/3rd the way to Maui and can still abort. They will be timed to land around noon. The raid launches about 6am. Therefore, the PoNR in after the raid launches.

And the historcal raid couldn't have been canceled at anything like such a late time. The last chance to abort that was several days out.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 14514
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by Curtis Lemay »

warspite1 wrote: Sat Dec 10, 2022 8:04 pm I've explained to you very clearly why the allocation of specific units is important to the plan and what happens subsequently.

Right now, without these details you simply have no plan. You can’t say at present whether the Japanese have a large enough destroyer force to cope with all these extra operations you've foisted on them, and having removed more than 10% of the IJN destroyer strength.
I don't care how many times you repeat this nonsense it doesn't give it any validity. The Luzon invasion has been postponed!!! Naval, air, and ground forces earmarked for that operation are now available elsewhere. More that enough to replace the tiny forces borrowed for Maui and Midway.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by warspite1 »

Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:34 pm
Again, the only data point we have is the one in which the Enterprise sailed into Pearl with 2/3rds of it aircraft on board.
warspite1

Why do data points - even ones taken totally out of context - become so important to you when you believe it suits your story, and yet can be ignored when it doesn't? You want to rigidly use historical date points? No problem. The army would never have allowed its troops to be used for this navy operation. There, that is an historical data point your 'plan' can't beat right from the outset. Your 'plan' is thus - and always will be - a total non-starter.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by warspite1 »

Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:50 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sat Dec 10, 2022 8:02 pm The point of no return is LONG before the raid. You are saying Japan's decision to go to war or not rests on the fate of 48 Bettys.....
No it isn't. The Bettys have a range of 3749 miles and Maui is only 2813 from Eniwetok. So, 2/3rd the way to Maui and can still abort. They will be timed to land around noon. The raid launches about 6am. Therefore, the PoNR in after the raid launches.

And the historcal raid couldn't have been canceled at anything like such a late time. The last chance to abort that was several days out.
warspite1

Again you've made a lot of assumptions that don't make a whole lot of sense. So the Bettys - even allowing for favourable weather - will have been in the air for over 20 hours when they land on Maui!!!!

And if they can't cancel the raid anything like up to one hour before, then why did you say they could?
Last edited by warspite1 on Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by warspite1 »

Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:53 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sat Dec 10, 2022 8:04 pm I've explained to you very clearly why the allocation of specific units is important to the plan and what happens subsequently.

Right now, without these details you simply have no plan. You can’t say at present whether the Japanese have a large enough destroyer force to cope with all these extra operations you've foisted on them, and having removed more than 10% of the IJN destroyer strength.
I don't care how many times you repeat this nonsense it doesn't give it any validity. The Luzon invasion has been postponed!!! Naval, air, and ground forces earmarked for that operation are now available elsewhere. More that enough to replace the tiny forces borrowed for Maui and Midway.
warspite1

...and yet you won't prove it. The Luzon invasion has been postponed. We know. And just doing this, creates problems for the Japanese and the capture of the NEI.

But you won't say what you units are going to be used and where. Therefore at the moment there is no plan - even in outline for Midway, there is no detailed plan for Maui, there is no plan for the effect of the Luzon postponement on the invasion of the Southern Philippines and the NEI.

This isn't nonsense. Provide detail please.

Please show that the Japanese have enough destroyers for all these operations. As per history, the Japanese will soon start losing destroyers to sinking and damage. How much slack (if any) do the Japanese have?
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 14514
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by Curtis Lemay »

KingHart wrote: Sat Dec 10, 2022 11:29 pm Sir,
If you would simply answer the questions regarding your plan, it would not be necessary for them to be repeated.
No. It evidently has to be repeated over and over and over.
Betty bombers. Let's once again look at your plan for the Betty bombers:
1 - The Japanese did not have an airfield on Eniwetok in December 1941. The airfield was only started in December 0f 1942, and was first used in November 1943. Please explain how you plan to conduct long-range air operations on an atoll with no airfield. There was an airfield on Roi-Namur, and one bomber unit (Nells) and one fighter unit (Claudes) were based there on 7 December. I point this out to try to show you that names are not "chrome", but actually important details in any plan.
My plan was to expand Eniwetok prewar. But you are right about Roi-Namur!!!! Thanks for that! Distance to Oahu = 2443 miles. To Maui = 2535 miles. And no prewar expansion required! Plan just got that much more doable!
2 - The distance from Roi-Namur to Maui is 2500 miles, as I stated in my previous post. The maximum range of the Betty, unloaded and unarmed, is 3176 miles. The extended combat range of the Betty is, however, only 937 miles, with a normal combat range of 748 miles. By the way, these quoted range figures for the Bettys come from a source that you yourself said was an unmatched authority - Gary Grigsby.
Even Gary can be wrong. Unamed the Betty can do 3749 miles. Fully armed 3132 miles. Sorry, I'm not going to repeat the links.
3 - Thus, as I said, your planes are arriving with no ammo or bomb load, having flown all night, having used at least 80% of their fuel, and having no certainty of there being anywhere for them to land. The idea is, to use your favorite term, "clueless".
2535/3749 = 67.6% of their fuel. Tons of range left.
US "cluelessness":
1 - An inexperienced Army lieutenant saw the radar, and believed it to show the flight of dive-bombers due in from Enterprise. A mistake, yes. But certainly not proof that the US was unprepared or "clueless".
2 - The sub was tracked, fired upon, and sunk. Not sure how that is a "clueless" response.
3 - Not sure what "ultimatum warning" you are referring to; given that the Japanese bungled the reception of the 14-point diplomatic missive that was supposed to be delivered prior to the raid, thus insuring the US public would view the raid as an unforgiveable sneak attack, it would seem to be the Japanese who were "clueless".
4 - All ships had ammo for the AAA, within 10-15 minutes of the attack Japanese planes were being targeted.
5 - Please provide any proof whatsoever that Washington could not believe the reports of the attack. Shocked, yes. Stunned into disbelief, no.
6 - The planes on Clark Field were being refueled when a delayed Japanese attack caught them on the ground. Had the attack been delivered as planned, all US planes would have been airborne. That the Japanese got lucky does not make the US "clueless".
Excuses for why they were clueless. Irrelevant.
Midway invasion:
1 - As I asked before, where is the invasion force during the raid? It is 1300 miles from Pearl Harbor to Midway; where do you sync up at?
2 - What ships are being used to transport the invasion force? It is 2500 miles from Japan to Midway; how are you refueling both KB and this Midway invasion?
They synch up at Midway. The very same ships that would have taken them to Luzon can take them to Midway.
Maui invasion:
1 - What do you mean by "ground crew ships"? Previously, you have stated that the only naval forces involved were the historic KB force and 12 APDs. Where do the ground crews ride? Where is all the fuel and bombs for the Bettys? Where is all the fuel for all these ships coming from?
Sorry, I'm just not going to repeat this over and over.
2 - As before, where is the invasion force landing on Maui? How can 2000 Japanese soldiers be landed on an island with a population of 47000 and no one notices?
2400 soldiers. They are guided by pathfinders who had months to scout and prepare. Maui is huge with a very long coastline. Its is in the middle of the night on a weekend at peacetime.
3 - What is the timeline for the landing and for the capture of both the airfield and port?
The landing is when the APDs get there from 100 miles out at dusk - about midnight. They then have about 8 hours to get into strike position. The strike takes place when the raid begins.
4 - Just who are these "pathfinders" you keep referring to? How many are there? How and when did they arrive on Maui? How do the various Japanese forces communicate with the "pathfinders"?
Japanese infiltrated or recruited agents. They communicate just how all pathfinders do - radios, signal lights, and, eventually, face to face.
Communications:
1 - Japanese radios were notoriously poor, to the point that some pilots actually removed prior to taking flight. Note that Fuchida, the Pearl Harbor strike leader, did not use his radio to talk to other pilots; the famous "Tora, Tora, Tora" signal was meant for Admiral Nagumo back on the Akagi, not for the planes. He used flares to signal the attack.
2 - The problem with using radio to communicate is that the enemy can intercept the signals. This the US did far better than the Japanese. Why, then, would the Japanese use coded radio transmissions to relay word of an abort, especially when the entire Japanese war offense depends on this raid?
And we can't have any risk, can we!? What does "Tora! Tora! Tora!" tell any US intercepter?
Luzon:
1 - Please explain why you believe the Japanese would totally ignore the US forces on Luzon, and instead invade Midway and attempt a suicidal invasion of Maui? How could your plan possibly benefit Japan's war aims?
Once the air assets on Luzon are destroyed, it is neutralized. It's far in the Japanese rear. The invasion of Maui has huge payoff - well worth the tiny risk. Delaying US response by two years definitely benefits Japan's war aims.
2 - You are using 6 battalions in your Maui and Midway invasions. That represents roughly 1/3 of the land forces assigned to attack Luzon. 2 of the battalions will be lost at Maui, and the other 4 stranded and starving on Midway. How do you plan to replace these forces?
?? Too nonsensical to even reply to.
3 - How do you plan to proceed with the invasion of Borneo without first having at least attempted to neutralize the US forces on Luzon? You are aware, that sizing the oilfields on Borneo and in the East Indies was the whole point of Japan going to war?
What can ground forces on Luzon do about anything if their air assets have been destroyed? Once their air assets have been destroyed Luzon is neutralized for quite a while.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 14514
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by Curtis Lemay »

Buckrock wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 2:37 am Since The Plan leaves Mac's USAFFE free to complete their full mobilization and deploy where they wish using their large numbers of inter-island transports, the Japanese would also need to use more battalions than historical (two) to ensure they hold Mindanao (Davao) and Mindoro against whatever schemes Mad Mac eventually comes up with. With 48th Div being needed for the DEI operations, I'd suggest the current version of The Plan would have already soaked up close to 100% of the historical IJA battalions originally used on Luzon.

Of course we'll just have to wait for the relevant plan details to confirm this.
I'm sure the Japanese wouldn't have done anything about those transports. :roll:
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by warspite1 »

Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:50 pm
The Bettys have a range of 3749 miles and Maui is only 2813 from Eniwetok.
warspite1

So - even with advantageous weather and everything perfect, the Betty's must abort about between 6 and 7 hours from Oahu.....
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 14514
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by Curtis Lemay »

warspite1 wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:02 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:34 pm
Again, the only data point we have is the one in which the Enterprise sailed into Pearl with 2/3rds of it aircraft on board.
warspite1

Why do data points - even ones taken totally out of context - become so important to you when you believe it suits your story, and yet can be ignored when it doesn't? You want to rigidly use historical date points? No problem. The army would never have allowed its troops to be used for this navy operation. There, that is an historical data point your 'plan' can't beat right from the outset. Your 'plan' is thus - and always will be - a total non-starter.
That is not a "data point". That is an opinion!!! You don't know what the Japanese would or wouldn't do given the right circumstances.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by warspite1 »

Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:29 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:02 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 4:34 pm
Again, the only data point we have is the one in which the Enterprise sailed into Pearl with 2/3rds of it aircraft on board.
warspite1

Why do data points - even ones taken totally out of context - become so important to you when you believe it suits your story, and yet can be ignored when it doesn't? You want to rigidly use historical date points? No problem. The army would never have allowed its troops to be used for this navy operation. There, that is an historical data point your 'plan' can't beat right from the outset. Your 'plan' is thus - and always will be - a total non-starter.
That is not a "data point". That is an opinion!!! You don't know what the Japanese would or wouldn't do given the right circumstances.
warspite1

The navy / army in-fighting was my opinion?

Knowing what the army would agree to under the right circumstances doesn't apply here. You have no plan. There is nothing for them to look at or agree to (not that they would in any case).

The comment about the USN process for carriers in peacetime is a data point. Enterprise - under your 'plan' enters Pearl in peacetime. THAT is your data point. In real life, she appproached in time of war. THAT is your data point. But you won't accept this because to do so is to go against your argument.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 14514
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by Curtis Lemay »

warspite1 wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:09 pm ...and yet you won't prove it. The Luzon invasion has been postponed. We know. And just doing this, creates problems for the Japanese and the capture of the NEI.
It doesn't create any problems. It releases assets that can then be used elsewhere - even in the NEI. Luzon was not a launching platform for invading anything further south.
But you won't say what you units are going to be used and where. Therefore at the moment there is no plan - even in outline for Midway, there is no detailed plan for Maui, there is no plan for the effect of the Luzon postponement on the invasion of the Southern Philippines and the NEI.
I've said what force I'm taking from Luzon - names are irrelevant. The plan for Midway and Maui are very detailed.
Please show that the Japanese have enough destroyers for all these operations. As per history, the Japanese will soon start losing destroyers to sinking and damage. How much slack (if any) do the Japanese have?
They will have a CVL, CAs, CLs, and DDs freed up from the Luzon operation . Plus ground units freed up.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 14514
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by Curtis Lemay »

warspite1 wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:34 pm The navy / army in-fighting was my opinion?
That's not even close to what you claimed.
Knowing what the army would agree to under the right circumstances doesn't apply here. You have no plan. There is nothing for them to look at or agree to (not that they would in any case).
I suppose if you repeat this crap over and over it will seem like it has some validity.
The comment about the USN process for carriers in peacetime is a data point. Enterprise - under your 'plan' enters Pearl in peacetime. THAT is your data point. In real life, she appproached in time of war. THAT is your data point. But you won't accept this because to do so is to go against your argument.
The only data point we have so far for a carrier sailing into Pearl was the one for the Enterprise on 12/7. They sailed in with 2/3rds of her aircraft onboard.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by warspite1 »

Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:35 pm
It doesn't create any problems. It releases assets that can then be used elsewhere - even in the NEI. Luzon was not a launching platform for invading anything further south.
warspite1

It potentially creates massive issues for the Japanese and the move on the NEI. The naval and air bases on Luzon (out of army reach) can be used to condunct operations elsewhere, both in the South China Sea and also the Southern PI - both of which the Japanese need secured for the NEI.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by warspite1 »

Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:35 pm
I've said what force I'm taking from Luzon - names are irrelevant. The plan for Midway and Maui are very detailed.
warspite1

....and you still don't have anything approaching a plan.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 14514
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by Curtis Lemay »

warspite1 wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:39 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:35 pm
It doesn't create any problems. It releases assets that can then be used elsewhere - even in the NEI. Luzon was not a launching platform for invading anything further south.
warspite1

It potentially creates massive issues for the Japanese and the move on the NEI. The naval and air bases on Luzon (out of army reach) can be used to condunct operations elsewhere, both in the South China Sea and also the Southern PI - both of which the Japanese need secured for the NEI.
Not without naval and air assets - which don't require an invasion to destroy.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by warspite1 »

Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:35 pm
They will have a CVL, CAs, CLs, and DDs freed up from the Luzon operation . Plus ground units freed up.
warspite1

Irrelevant to the question.

Please confirm how you know the Japanese have enough destroyers given you've denuded the force by more than 10%, you've added extra operations, and the Japanese are about to start taking losses to their destroyer force.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 14514
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by Curtis Lemay »

warspite1 wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:40 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:35 pm
I've said what force I'm taking from Luzon - names are irrelevant. The plan for Midway and Maui are very detailed.
warspite1

....and you still don't have anything approaching a plan.
Of course I do. And I've detailed it repeatedly. I don't include unnecessary trivia, like the water level in each canteen. Or the names of units (chrome). Just the critical factors.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by warspite1 »

Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:39 pm
warspite1 wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:34 pm The navy / army in-fighting was my opinion?
That's not even close to what you claimed.
warspite1

The navy / army in-fighting was my opinion?

Knowing what the army would agree to under the right circumstances doesn't apply here. You have no plan. There is nothing for them to look at or agree to (not that they would in any case).


Please quote my full comment. Selective quoting is not right. You did it a lot in the Spain/Turkey thread.

The above is what I claimed.
Last edited by warspite1 on Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 14514
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: A Japanese invasion of Hawaii

Post by Curtis Lemay »

warspite1 wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:42 pm
Curtis Lemay wrote: Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:35 pm
They will have a CVL, CAs, CLs, and DDs freed up from the Luzon operation . Plus ground units freed up.
warspite1

Irrelevant to the question.

Please confirm how you know the Japanese have enough destroyers given you've denuded the force by more than 10%, you've added extra operations, and the Japanese are about to start taking losses to their destroyer force.
If its gunfire they need, they will have more than historically via the releases from Luzon. If its ASW they need, the APDs will be back with that by the time they would have been released from Luzon.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”