Two version systems for CMANO?

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
Curious
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 11:04 am
Location: Colorado

Two version systems for CMANO?

Post by Curious »

What is the connection between Build 972.11 and v.1.13.5? How do they "relate" to each other? I don't know about anyone else, but I find this kind of confusing. This game is complex enough without having two version systems for the same game.
Eggstor
Posts: 353
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:04 pm

RE: Two version systems for CMANO?

Post by Eggstor »

They are one and the same. The build number is more of an internal tracking system, as there are multiple builds that do not go out into the wild.

Also, the Steam version does not support the last .x when listing the version number. One only sees Version 1.13, not 1.13.5, so the build number is useful there.
Dimitris
Posts: 15200
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:29 am
Contact:

RE: Two version systems for CMANO?

Post by Dimitris »

Hi,

The "v1.13.x" numbering is the "official" designation and used primarily for the auto-updater's benefit, so that it can know when it must fetch an update. In most cases, the "Build XXX.XX" format is the one used to keep track of the actual version you are using.

(This parallel-designation pattern is actually pretty common in frequently-updated software projects. If you run "winver" on your start menu you should see something like "Windows 10 - Version 1709 - Build XYZ.ABC")
thewood1
Posts: 9911
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

RE: Two version systems for CMANO?

Post by thewood1 »

The best way to think about it is build numbers (eg. 972.11) are incremental improvements in the game. Releases (eg. 1.13.5) are just that, public official releases. When a build is released as official update, the build number will align with the release version number. This allows the devs to have internal and public build numbers between official releases and track them. If its a big issue, they could let only release quality and numbered versions go out to the public. I personally wouldn't like that. I like the beta builds and being able to play with new features and influence some of it.

One simple suggestion is don't worry about the builds and just ignore them. Only download and use official (eg. 1.13.5) releases and only reference those releases. If you have the discipline to do that, build numbers become moot. If someone says you they need a build number, just put the release version in the reply.
thewood1
Posts: 9911
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

RE: Two version systems for CMANO?

Post by thewood1 »

Dimitris ninja'ed me on the reply.
Curious
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 11:04 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Two version systems for CMANO?

Post by Curious »

Thanks everyone. I guess I'll just play the game and hope that I have the latest version/build.
thewood1
Posts: 9911
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

RE: Two version systems for CMANO?

Post by thewood1 »

No need to hope. Just use the official version in the Member's area or on Steam. They might be slower to get the features in the beta builds, but if confusion and concern outweigh having those features, no problems...just stick with the official release.
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: Two version systems for CMANO?

Post by mikmykWS »

I haven't really seen too many complaints about this in the history of the game.

Mike
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12326
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Two version systems for CMANO?

Post by Sardaukar »

It can be bit confusing, I always refer to version number on top of screen to check if I am with latest build.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”