Med-22 Submitted to CSP
Moderator: MOD_Command
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
Thanks Andrew.
Some of your points are intended (no SAM reloads, delayed realization the shooting war has expanded etc) but there are a lot of good points that I'll fix up.
Bart
Some of your points are intended (no SAM reloads, delayed realization the shooting war has expanded etc) but there are a lot of good points that I'll fix up.
Bart
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
Hi Gunner
Thanks for another great and challenging scenario.
I have a few observations though.
Four of the SU-34´s are tasked with a ship strike but are loaded with AS-15 Kent missiles which are land attack only.
In the briefing you change between using NATO and russian designations and sometimes mix them.
It have nothing to do with gameplay, but it triggers my OCD
, and I don´t think a NATO mission briefing would mix the designations. The Iskander is SS-26 Stone, or 9K720 Iskander-M, not SS-26 Iskander. Likewise the Pantsir is SA-22 Greyhound.
Please feel free to disregard this if you don´t think it´s important.
It´s mainly my OCD but I had to say it
Hope this helped and please don´t take it the wrong way.
This is really nitpicking.
Søren
Thanks for another great and challenging scenario.
I have a few observations though.
Four of the SU-34´s are tasked with a ship strike but are loaded with AS-15 Kent missiles which are land attack only.
In the briefing you change between using NATO and russian designations and sometimes mix them.
It have nothing to do with gameplay, but it triggers my OCD

Please feel free to disregard this if you don´t think it´s important.
It´s mainly my OCD but I had to say it

Hope this helped and please don´t take it the wrong way.
This is really nitpicking.
Søren
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
No problem Søren
Easy stuff to fix and only makes things better.
Cheers
B
Easy stuff to fix and only makes things better.
Cheers
B
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
OK here is an update with a bunch of fixes.
Thanks for the help on this one guys. Keep em coming
B
Thanks for the help on this one guys. Keep em coming
B
- Attachments
-
- Med-22.zip
- (574.55 KiB) Downloaded 56 times
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 1:01 pm
- Location: Deep in the Heart
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
First time, long time. Just want to log in and say I really appreciate this thread and the hard work that you did. On top of the screenshots and analysis / recap. Thank you for sharing,
- BeirutDude
- Posts: 2799
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:44 am
- Location: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
Hey Bart,
Just getting set up for a go at it. Looks like fun, similar to the Med Tsunami Scenario so I'm interested to see the differences.
I noticed CAW-1 on CSG-8, VAW-126's E-2's should be five (5) E-2D's. The Seahawks upgraded in 2016.
Al
Just getting set up for a go at it. Looks like fun, similar to the Med Tsunami Scenario so I'm interested to see the differences.
I noticed CAW-1 on CSG-8, VAW-126's E-2's should be five (5) E-2D's. The Seahawks upgraded in 2016.
Al
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985
I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985
I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
Good catch Al
Any idea if the Hawkeyes are of the refueling variety yet?
Just took a look at Mediterranean Tsunami and there are certainly some parallels. Med 22 has much more of an international flavour to it, but no Israelis or civilian traffic.
Bart
Any idea if the Hawkeyes are of the refueling variety yet?
Just took a look at Mediterranean Tsunami and there are certainly some parallels. Med 22 has much more of an international flavour to it, but no Israelis or civilian traffic.
Bart
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
- HalfLifeExpert
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 3:39 pm
- Location: California, United States
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
I'm running the latest version now. The NFZ is in effect, but hostilities have not commenced. I'm loving the tense waiting for the go ahead to open fire, especially since i've got two subs locked down.
I'm very interested to see what Pacific-22 has in store.
I'm very interested to see what Pacific-22 has in store.
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
Yes I like that tension as well. Additionally you will/might have a short while where Russia is not sure if the shooting war will expand beyond Ukraine. Of course your actions can and will likely dispel that illusion quickly.
I'm building the Pacific right now. Its tricky:
-Keeping Japan out of the fight
-Limiting strikes to 'not Russia proper' which I am generously interpreting as the Kurils
-Reagan is in her annual refit so Abe Lincoln is in theater covering the gap
This should be a bit of a cake walk so I'm going to limit it to 24hrs
I'm building the Pacific right now. Its tricky:
-Keeping Japan out of the fight
-Limiting strikes to 'not Russia proper' which I am generously interpreting as the Kurils
-Reagan is in her annual refit so Abe Lincoln is in theater covering the gap
This should be a bit of a cake walk so I'm going to limit it to 24hrs
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
- HalfLifeExpert
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 3:39 pm
- Location: California, United States
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
Yeah i'm 45 minutes in after the NFZ is active, and no shooting yet.
- BeirutDude
- Posts: 2799
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:44 am
- Location: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
Bart yes they are the refueling variant and I believe updated electronics.
This scenario is definitely has much more of an international flavor. Mine was largely American.
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985
I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985
I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
Roger, will fix that up.
Cheers
B
Cheers
B
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
Any other comments on this one?
Thanks
Thanks
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
Re: Med-22 New Scenario for testing
Posted to community page. Changed name to NFZ_Med-22 to group all 4 scenarios together.
Here is the latest
Here is the latest
- Attachments
-
- NFZ_Med-22.zip
- (555.5 KiB) Downloaded 59 times
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
Re: Med-22 Submitted to CSP
Just started playing this one and so far it has been great!
Now that a new version of the database has come out, can I update it to the db 494 without any glitches?
I have never done a db update before so I don't really know how it works
Now that a new version of the database has come out, can I update it to the db 494 without any glitches?
I have never done a db update before so I don't really know how it works
Re: Med-22 Submitted to CSP
That should be fine. Not sure it will impact the scenario or not.
Updating the DB is easy enough, There is a Video out there as well, not sure. There are a couple steps so just take it slow and know where you have put the SDB file and do a 'deep rebuild'.
Updating the DB is easy enough, There is a Video out there as well, not sure. There are a couple steps so just take it slow and know where you have put the SDB file and do a 'deep rebuild'.
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
Re: Med-22 Submitted to CSP
What would the benefit be in updating to 494? Is there one?
Re: Med-22 Submitted to CSP
Only if one of the platforms in the scenario has been updated. Not sure if that is the case or not
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
Re: Med-22 Submitted to CSP
The only thing I did was go to Edit scenario, then Editor/database/upgrade scenario to latest database/Force deep rebuild
Isn't that enough?
Re: Med-22 Submitted to CSP
Ok so that didn't work out so well, I lost all multi-mission Tomahawks but gained a F-ton of TLAM