Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Broncepulido
Posts: 437
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:12 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Broncepulido »

Ships designated to employ F-35C and/or F-35B and year target dates:

USS Wasp (LHD 1)
USS Essex (LHD 2)
USS America (LHA 6)
HMS Queen Elizabeth (UK)
USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70)
ITS Cavour (Italy)
USS Makin Island (LHD 8)
USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72)
USS Tripoli 2021 (LHA 7)
USS George Washington 2022 (CVN 73)
USS Boxer 2023 (LHD 4)
USS Theodore Roosevelt 2023 (CVN 71)
USS Iwo Jima 2024 (LHD 7)
USS Bataan 2025 (LHD 5)
USS Gerald Ford 2025 (CVN 78)
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... ilestones/
14yellow14
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:47 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by 14yellow14 »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add new AIM-120D-3 missile (IOC 2023) </summary>
<detail>
AMRAAM’s new AIM-120D-3 missile variant will deliver additional capabilities, including hardware and software upgrades, to address advanced threats.

The F3R program has been developed for the existing AIM-120C-8 and AIM-120D-3 AMRAAMs, which already represent the ‘top of the line’ for these missiles. Of these, the D-model already offers some significant advantages, including a two-way datalink with third-party targeting capabilities.

In particular, the company pointed to the enhanced seeker performance that the F3R provides to the AIM-120D-3, which is now better able to target enemy aircraft and missiles in adverse weather, even when threats are employing advanced electronic warfare systems.

AIM-120D-3 production deliveries beginning in 2023

<evidence>
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/4 ... with-china
https://seapowermagazine.org/new-amraam ... est-shots/
https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1406359957902143492
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news ... =121135738

</evidence>
User avatar
Blast33
Posts: 705
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2018 1:23 pm
Location: Above and beyond

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Blast33 »

Maybe useful in one way or another?


Image
Attachments
image97.jpg
image97.jpg (510.42 KiB) Viewed 570 times
User avatar
Blast33
Posts: 705
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2018 1:23 pm
Location: Above and beyond

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Blast33 »

Maybe useful?
Iranian missiles flowing through time..

Image
Attachments
FEBMcTXMAQw3sQ.jpg
FEBMcTXMAQw3sQ.jpg (336.8 KiB) Viewed 570 times
BDukes
Posts: 2633
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by BDukes »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add AN/SSQ-53G DIFAR model Sonobouys to US platforms (MH-60R, P-8 etc, Hypo Vikings etc)</summary>
<detail>Looks like the G's are coming into service. Stat spec sheet in first link. Probably can't model one of the key features (change mode) in CMO yet. </detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/ThrustWR/status/143 ... 51/photo/1
https://twitter.com/ThrustWR/status/1435620261253062661
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
BDukes
Posts: 2633
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by BDukes »

<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>Add Mk.53 launcher and Mk.234 Nulka Decoys to US Carriers from 2016 on.</summary>
<detail>Add Mk.53 launcher and Mk.234 Nulka Decoys to US Carriers from 2016 on. Looks like Ike was the first and on port and starboard sides-Alstar links below have pictures.Launchers are already in DB on #2397 Canberra</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/ThrustWR/status/1470940245390675974
https://www.defenseworld.net/news/15143 ... ft_Carrier
https://www.navy.mil/Resources/Fact-Fil ... tem-nulka/
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/ ... ochure.pdf
https://twitter.com/Alstar_tw/status/14 ... 9138078723
https://twitter.com/Alstar_tw/status/14 ... 00/photo/1
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
tylerblakebrandon
Posts: 428
Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 5:16 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by tylerblakebrandon »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add Antonov An-30 (NATO reporting name: Clank)</summary>
<detail>The Antonov An-30 (NATO reporting name: Clank), is a development of the An-24 designed for aerial cartography. In addition to its principal use as a survey aircraft, it has also been used by Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine to carry out surveillance under the Open Skies Treaty. Soviet An-30s completely mapped Afghanistan in 1982 while Cuban An-30s saw active service in Angola in 1987 and Ukrainian An-30s have been in use during the Donbass conflict. Current and former operators include Bulgaria, Romania, Russia, Ukraine, Afghanistan, Angola, Cuba, Czech Republic, Czechoslovakia, Mongolia, People's Republic of China, Soviet Union, and Vietnam as well as several Civil operators.</detail>
<evidence>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonov_An-30
https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/455381
https://skybrary.aero/aircraft/an30
https://antonov.com/en/history/an-30
https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraf ... ft_id=1811
https://www.airforce-technology.com/pro ... onov-an30/
</evidence>
BDukes
Posts: 2633
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by BDukes »

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Add correct KLUB/sizzler missile to Kazan #677. The second stage warhead is currently carried instead of the first stage which carries the second stage. </summary>
<detail>The Klub is modeled like an ICMB. Penetrator (which is what is on board now is hosted on the missile. The penetrator is onboard now which has a range of 20nm</detail>
<evidence>
Can see in the db viewer.
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
User avatar
CV60
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:40 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by CV60 »

<type>CORRECTION</type>
<summary>Correct max speed for all versions of MiG-25 (MiG-25P, MiG-25PD, MiG-25PDS, MiG-25RB, MiG-25RBS, MiG-25RBT) </summary>
<detail>Current figures for MiG-25 show a maximum speed at Band 4 (36,000+ feet) to be Mach 2.35/1350 knots. According to Mladenov, the max speed is 3,000 km/hr (Mach 2.83 or 1620 knts). This is confirmed by the Soviet document "Practical Aerodynamics of Aircraft MiG-25RB". A machine translated image of the applicable page(s) are attached. I have combined data from both Mladenov and "Practical Aerodynamics" in this single image, as I can post only one image per post. </detail>
<evidence>
Mladenov, Alexander. Soviet Cold War Fighters. Fonthill Media, 2017 (see attached)
https://avsimrus.com/f/documents-16/pra ... 20979.html
https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/mig25/
</evidence>

Note: the speed discrepancy on the Mig-25 is particularly noticeable, as eliminates the one advantage the FOXBAT had over western fighters and makes it difficult to employ it as the Soviets designed and envisioned.

Image
Attachments
MiG25info.jpg
MiG25info.jpg (948.77 KiB) Viewed 578 times
“Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?” -Abraham Lincoln
BDukes
Posts: 2633
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by BDukes »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add Nigerian Roland 2 SAM[AMX-30]1985 x 12 </summary>
<detail>Nigeria received 12-16 of these systems in 1985-86. According to pictures still in service. Must of bought the extended service package on the missiles. Copy #77 in DB.</detail>
<evidence>
https://defensenigeria.wordpress.com/20 ... le-system/
https://twitter.com/HammerOfWar5/status ... 1617558533
https://twitter.com/HammerOfWar5/status ... 5021864970
https://defensenigeria.wordpress.com/20 ... ould-fear/
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
BDukes
Posts: 2633
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by BDukes »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add North Korea 57mm M1985 SPAAG x 2 1982-Current </summary>
<detail>Homegrown SPAAG. No fire radar fire control radar. Optics only. Bad ZSU-57-2 copy due to no low firing arc. Game ways this equates to no surface capability. </detail>
<evidence>
https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/m1985-spaag/
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
BDukes
Posts: 2633
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by BDukes »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add Russian 48Ya-K1 Podlet Radar from 2016. </summary>
<detail>Is the current standard mobile low-altitude detection radar. S-band. 10km alt and 200km range (if you believe sales literature). These are everywhere Russia is right now. Syria, Ukrainian Border. etc. etc </detail>
<evidence>
fb.asp?m=5071345
fb.asp?m=4931657
https://twitter.com/Lorkeske/status/1474068024776876048
https://twitter.com/halmiso1/status/1176729815849865216
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1359929147766800385
https://twitter.com/Missilito/status/472293701512077312
https://twitter.com/IiiTango/status/1341051952352931842
https://twitter.com/colonelhomsi/status ... 2315188224
https://twitter.com/Cyberspec1/status/1 ... 3054188551
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
User avatar
CV60
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:40 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by CV60 »

<type>CORRECT </type>
<summary>The Kub-3M sensor (Sensor_499) is incorrectly listed as a SLAR. In fact it is an ELINT sensor </summary>
<detail>The Kub-3M aka KOOB-3 aka SRA-10 is an passive airborne ELINT system receiving in the centimetric (3-30 Ghz) waveband, not an active SLAR radar. </detail>
<evidence>
Burdin, Sergey. Tupolev TU-22. Barnsley: Pen and Sword, 2005. ;
"3.4 Reconnaissance and Electronic Warfare." Etoiles Rouges Sur L'Allemagne. Accessed December 29, 2021. https://www.16va.be/3.4_la_reco_part5_eng.html.;"[1.0] MiG-25 Foxbat." AirVectors. Accessed December 28, 2021. https://www.airvectors.net/avmig25_1.html. ; "MiG-25RB (product 02B; «FoxBat – B»)." &#1048;&#1089;&#1087;&#1099;&#1090;&#1072;&#1090;&#1077;&#1083;&#1080;. Accessed December 29, 2021. https://testpilot.ru/en/rossiya-e/mikoyan/mig25rb/.
Polmar, Norman and Bessette, John "Spyplanes: the Illustrated Guide to Manned Reconnaissance and Surveillance Aircraft, pg. 128



Image
Attachments
Untitled_Panorama1.jpg
Untitled_Panorama1.jpg (513 KiB) Viewed 578 times
“Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?” -Abraham Lincoln
arielchyld
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:20 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by arielchyld »

I noticed the modern version Of the BB Missouri is missing from the database. Its did even see combat and by modern standards was armed very well and fought in the golf war... kinda... surprised this isn't in the database as it answers what if a battleship was modernized questions and would make some great what if ideas... check the wiki as it has full specs on 1980's era battleship in service
User avatar
CV60
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:40 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by CV60 »

I noticed the modern version Of the BB Missouri is missing from the database. Its did even see combat and by modern standards was armed very well and fought in the golf war... kinda... surprised this isn't in the database as it answers what if a battleship was modernized questions and would make some great what if ideas... check the wiki as it has full specs on 1980's era battleship in service

It, and all the various renditions of the Iowa-class from the 1980's are in the DB3000 database. It is possible that you have the game opened to a pre-1982 scenario, so it is using the CWDB database. See below image.

Image
Attachments
20211229_202818.jpg
20211229_202818.jpg (379.82 KiB) Viewed 578 times
“Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?” -Abraham Lincoln
arielchyld
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:20 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by arielchyld »

Thank You I was playing Northren Inferno when I checked.... That was it!! I am going to play with these ships for sure :)
ExNusquam
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:26 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by ExNusquam »

In what I'm calling "Extreme Rivet Counting", The Harpoon Active Radar Seekers (DBIDs 85, 82, 80, 4034) are all listed as I Band, when the DB descriptions (and the Standard Aircraft Characteristics) list the Harpoon seeker as J Band (Ku).

Probably impacts some DECM somewhere...
tylerblakebrandon
Posts: 428
Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 5:16 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by tylerblakebrandon »

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add BLU-137/B 2000lb penetrator warhead for modified GBU-31 JDAM kit</summary>
<detail>Updated penetrator warhead with modified JDAM tail assembly for greater reliability.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/1 ... ster-bombs
https://insidedefense.com/insider/air-f ... ator-bombs
https://www.aerodefensetech.com/compone ... cles/38531
https://www.saffm.hq.af.mil/Portals/84/ ... pv9w%3D%3D

</evidence>
Locked

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”