1938 GD game

Post here to meet players for MP games and generally engage in ribbing and banter about your prowess.

Moderator: Vic

User avatar
ernieschwitz
Posts: 4536
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by ernieschwitz »

I´ll have to correct myself a bit.

Cities that are NOT russian, would not count their production to this list...
Creator of High Quality Scenarios for:
  • Advanced Tactics Gold
    DC: Warsaw to Paris
    DC: Community Project.
Try this Global WW2 Scenario: https://www.vrdesigns.net/scenario.php?nr=280
User avatar
Jeffrey H.
Posts: 3154
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca.

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by Jeffrey H. »

What sets the multipliers to convert from production points to units produced ?

History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.

Ron Swanson
User avatar
Jeffrey H.
Posts: 3154
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca.

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by Jeffrey H. »

Shouldn't 100% production be simply given to the player at some point ? What's the 100% based on ? A certain year ?
History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.

Ron Swanson
User avatar
Twotribes
Posts: 6466
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Jacksonville NC
Contact:

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by Twotribes »

If you had purchased it in 1938 it would have been around 338.
Favoritism is alive and well here.
User avatar
ernieschwitz
Posts: 4536
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by ernieschwitz »

ORIGINAL: Jeffrey H.

Shouldn't 100% production be simply given to the player at some point ? What's the 100% based on ? A certain year ?

I at one point honestly considered doing that. But then I reminded myself that the game is anything else but a simulation. This is a game of free actions. So players have been given the freedom to decide when they want to focus on economy and when they want to focus on war production, research, and other stuff.

The 80% which you have been set at, to begin with, is an expression of two things. Firstly the total amount of production is based on GDP for the year of 1938, and the 80% is an expression of how efficient I believed that that countries work force was.

Increasing to 100% thus represents and increase in efficiency of your own peoples industry.

Increasing it further expresses that same thing.

If you start off by building factories, you have more or less chosen not to pursue an increase in efficiency. Instead you have chosen to simply build more production, without increasing the efficiency. If you later want to increase efficiency, then the factories production will be included in the calculation (chemical factories will not). This is because increasing efficiency would increase production of those factories as well...

Lesson learned here: Build your efficiency up, before you invest in factories.
Creator of High Quality Scenarios for:
  • Advanced Tactics Gold
    DC: Warsaw to Paris
    DC: Community Project.
Try this Global WW2 Scenario: https://www.vrdesigns.net/scenario.php?nr=280
User avatar
Twotribes
Posts: 6466
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Jacksonville NC
Contact:

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by Twotribes »

Any news when the new build is out?
Favoritism is alive and well here.
User avatar
Jeffrey H.
Posts: 3154
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca.

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by Jeffrey H. »

I'm going to remove myself from the next game, I'm too busy ATM to take on another one.
History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.

Ron Swanson
User avatar
ernieschwitz
Posts: 4536
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by ernieschwitz »

New version is up.

Adressed some issues, hope you like my solutions.
Creator of High Quality Scenarios for:
  • Advanced Tactics Gold
    DC: Warsaw to Paris
    DC: Community Project.
Try this Global WW2 Scenario: https://www.vrdesigns.net/scenario.php?nr=280
User avatar
Twotribes
Posts: 6466
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Jacksonville NC
Contact:

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by Twotribes »

Not sure I like losing manpower for factories. But at least it has a reason for being true although women could have been used in factories.
Favoritism is alive and well here.
User avatar
Twotribes
Posts: 6466
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Jacksonville NC
Contact:

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by Twotribes »

Ok who still wants to play.

I want the USA.
Favoritism is alive and well here.
User avatar
ironduke1955
Posts: 2037
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 9:52 am
Location: UK

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by ironduke1955 »

I think we have Twotribes Falco cpdeyoung and Ironduke possibly larry JBurstyn I will send him a e-mail anyone else would be welcome.

So far

Germany ?
Italy ?
Japan Larry
ussr Ironduke
France ?
UK ?
USA Twotribes
China Falco
Are we like late Rome, infatuated with past glories, ruled by a complacent, greedy elite, and hopelessly powerless to respond to changing conditions?

User avatar
ironduke1955
Posts: 2037
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 9:52 am
Location: UK

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by ironduke1955 »

Again thanks to the Mods creators for putting the work in once again.
Are we like late Rome, infatuated with past glories, ruled by a complacent, greedy elite, and hopelessly powerless to respond to changing conditions?

falco148
Posts: 629
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 6:11 am
Location: Yantai, PRC.

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by falco148 »

Yes, hats off to the mods. Great work.

Actually I wouldn't mind playing China again if that's possible.
User avatar
ironduke1955
Posts: 2037
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 9:52 am
Location: UK

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by ironduke1955 »

Great China it is Larry would like the Japanese and I would like to try the Soviet Union. Leaving UK/France Germany/Italy. I guess that leaves us looking for one more player.
Are we like late Rome, infatuated with past glories, ruled by a complacent, greedy elite, and hopelessly powerless to respond to changing conditions?

User avatar
cpdeyoung
Posts: 5378
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:26 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by cpdeyoung »

Whew, tough crew. Somebody has to be the bad guy.

Germany/Italy for me.

Chuck
User avatar
cpdeyoung
Posts: 5378
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:26 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by cpdeyoung »

Thinking it over I will take Great Britain and France. Germany takes even more time, and this will be my fourth game.

Chuck
User avatar
cpdeyoung
Posts: 5378
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:26 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by cpdeyoung »

So far

Germany ?
Italy ?
Japan Larry
ussr Ironduke
France cpdeyoung
UK cpdeyoung
USA Twotribes
China Falco
User avatar
ironduke1955
Posts: 2037
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 9:52 am
Location: UK

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by ironduke1955 »

One more player required to play Germany/Italy the most fun powers to play in GD1938
Are we like late Rome, infatuated with past glories, ruled by a complacent, greedy elite, and hopelessly powerless to respond to changing conditions?

User avatar
Jeffrey H.
Posts: 3154
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca.

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by Jeffrey H. »

ORIGINAL: Twotribes

Not sure I like losing manpower for factories. But at least it has a reason for being true although women could have been used in factories.

It does sound like a good idea to me, it might need to be tuned a bit but it sounds like a 2 birds with one stone kind of thing.

History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.

Ron Swanson
User avatar
cpdeyoung
Posts: 5378
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:26 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA

RE: 1938 GD game

Post by cpdeyoung »

I would like to propose we do not use "Allied shared recon" in this game. It can prevent alliances when things get complicated. In game 14 GB cannot make an alliance with China because the USA is at war with China, and allied with GB. The USA would see all of the enemy, and vice versa.

I also feel that too much is shared. One can always send selected screenshots to allies, but often there are things we want private, even from allies. It only requires a click of a button to break an alliance with a DoW.

This brings up another point. I would like to negotiate an end to an alliance without going to war. Perhaps a choice to end the alliance in three months to give everyone time to move out of an allies' territory.

Chuck
Post Reply

Return to “Opponents Wanted”