Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

8th July 1941
Turn 5
Southern Front


Its ridiculous. I have a Tsarist Commander, I then have Zhukov taking over and not one army fully activated in the south..... [&:]

So a situation where I should be able to give the three Romanian divisions east of the Dneistr a bloody nose, means I can actually do.... nothing.

Ditto 9th Army and the Germans to the north..... In a fit of anger I decide to attack here anyway. Because they cannot move and attack, failure means the entire army are likely to be surrounded but I can get an 80% modifier and its 351 vs 216 with the Germans in Blitzkrieg posture (so not so good on defence) and most of the Soviets are at 100% readiness.

The attack shows what would have been possible against the Romanians as the three German divisions are beaten back across the river.

Emboldened I now re-consider going with what I have against the Romanians further south....

I can get 214 vs 151 with an 80% modifier. One division is at 70% readiness - the other three at 100%. The Romanians are surprisingly well dug-in considering they have just crossed the river, but have readiness between 60 and 78%. They too are in Blitzkrieg posture.

What to do? Move to a better defensive position or go for it? Hell let's go for it. I check around desperately for any more units to attack with, but the units in Odessa are all short on AP's. Here goes.... The attack is a success and once again the invaders are ejected from the east bank.

Unfortunately there are three German divisions that have formed a bridgehead, but those attacks improve the mood somewhat.

Elsewhere...

12th Army defend Proskurow with a couple of divisions, but 4 of the army's units cannot get across the river and there is a large gap between them and the retreating 9th Army. Had I known those attacks would have been successful I would not have withdrawn so quickly [:(] Ah the joys of being an army commander...[:D]

That leaves Southwestern HQ and once again the lack of AP's means the defence is compromised. 228th Rifle Division in the north cannot move even one hex which would have seen them behind the river line northwest of Zhitomir. These units should be running but....

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (318.38 KiB) Viewed 490 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
James Ward
Posts: 1163
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, USA

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by James Ward »

You can always have Khrushchev shoot someone to lower paranoia.[:D] It is better to be able to play the fortify and garrison cards than have a good front commander in the early stage.
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: James Ward

You can always have Khrushchev shoot someone to lower paranoia.[:D] It is better to be able to play the fortify and garrison cards than have a good front commander in the early stage.
warspite1

Well I could, but having spent the pp to get him in the first place why not simply cut out the middle man?

As for better to play the fortify and garrison cards - these are free aren't they so why not both? Surely - as proved in my AAR - if the Soviets can activate they have options to run and/or hurt the Germans, as opposed to sitting around and getting screwed through lack of AP - even though my useless replacement commanders are supposed to avoid that.

I would love to know what I could have done to the 1st Panzergruppe and the 11th Army with some decent activation.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
James Ward
Posts: 1163
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, USA

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by James Ward »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: James Ward

You can always have Khrushchev shoot someone to lower paranoia.[:D] It is better to be able to play the fortify and garrison cards than have a good front commander in the early stage.
warspite1

Well I could, but having spent the pp to get him in the first place why not simply cut out the middle man?

As for better to play the fortify and garrison cards - these are free aren't they so why not both? Surely - as proved in my AAR - if the Soviets can activate they have options to run and/or hurt the Germans, as opposed to sitting around and getting screwed through lack of AP - even though my useless replacement commanders are supposed to avoid that.

I would love to know what I could have done to the 1st Panzergruppe and the 11th Army with some decent activation.

The problem is when Stalin has a melt down you lose the fortification and garrison cards. Shooting a Marshal drops paranoria by 30 so if you think you will lose a lot of cities that turn then shoot somebody! :)
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

12th July 1941
Turn 6


Not sure I have the motivation here. Another Paranoia episode for Stalin meaning:

- 2 Army Commanders will be executed and a turn of confusion in those armies. These are:
MajGen Zhandov 30th Army (Initiative +18: Threat -1)
replaced by MajGen Bychkov (+10: -1)
LtGen Geraismenko 21st Army (Initiative +16: Threat -1)
replaced by MajGen Umsky (+10: -1)
- only reinforcement cards can be used
- saved pp lost. I am pretty sure I used them all last time.

- Overall paranoia level reduced by -50. Well the last reduction of -40 didn't help much but....

Zhukov moves to Pawlograd - presumably Kiev has fallen? Khrushchev stays where he is.

Reinforcements:
22 divsions deployed
16 failed to deploy
4 HQ and 41 divisions pending deployment

Activation is the best yet overall, but is disastrous in the Centre - so much for Khrushchev [8|]

North - 3 army fully activated, 1 partially and 1 didn't - 3 NEUTRAL
Central - 3 armies fully activated, 2 partially and 6 didn't - 9 NEUTRAL
South - 4 armies fully activated, 1 partially and 0 didn't - 1 NEUTRAL

Losses: The Soviet curve is not as steep as it was and I at last break the 100k mark with the Germans.
Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (133.4 KiB) Viewed 490 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
James Ward
Posts: 1163
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, USA

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by James Ward »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

12th July 1941
Turn 6


Not sure I have the motivation here. Another Paranoia episode for Stalin meaning:

- 2 Army Commanders will be executed and a turn of confusion in those armies. These are:
MajGen Zhandov 30th Army (Initiative +18: Threat -1)
replaced by MajGen Bychkov (+10: -1)
LtGen Geraismenko 21st Army (Initiative +16: Threat -1)
replaced by MajGen Umsky (+10: -1)
- only reinforcement cards can be used
- saved pp lost. I am pretty sure I used them all last time.

- Overall paranoia level reduced by -50. Well the last reduction of -40 didn't help much but....

I think the level can never go below zero. I had a level of over 80 once and had 2 episode in a row. That really sucks!
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

12th July 1941
Turn 6


No cards to play, but 4 armies to place. I will look at the last turn replay first....

I place:

- 48th Army at Luga (MajGen Akhiluston - Initiative 15: Threat -1)
- 47th Army at Kiev (MajGen Khatilevich - Initiative 10: Threat -1)
- 34th Army at Smolensk (MajGen Popov - Initiative 20: Threat 0)
- 33rd Army at Polotsk (MajGen Mostevenko - Initiative 10: Threat -1)

This last one is a bit of a risk to say the least but there is little point in faffing around the way things are going.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

12th July 1941
Turn 6
Finland


As expected the three division on the Baltic short are destroyed. In Karelia the 4 remaining divisions still cannot move.

Strangely the Finns show no sign (unless its FOW and they are on their way) of heading south, but one division remains the wrong side of the border - presumably incurring penalties??

One border division reaches Tichwin, the second remains between the town and Leningrad ready to react to whichever looming crisis is bigger at the time...
Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (239.05 KiB) Viewed 490 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

12th July 1941
Turn 6
Northern Front


As in Bessarabia, so in northwest Russia...

German infantry rather than armour skilfully breakthrough over the Dvina and forge a breach in the 27th Army lines, splitting them in two. I decide to take action.

The German 21st Infantry Division is on its own manning the bridgehead.

I can get 346:71 with a 50% modifier. Most Soviets are at 100% so I give it a go. The 21st does not retreat over the river - but marches forward to its fellow division. That is really annoying as it makes the next attack harder. But in for a penny....

I can get 256:111 with a 40% modifier. Sadly that extra unit was crucial. The stack holds...[:@]

Having denuded the defence of the river line I decide to go for a third attack; three divisions assault the 217th Division southwest of Riga. The attack forces the division back.

And that ends that. Now PLEASE can I have some mud in the north????

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (298.15 KiB) Viewed 490 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

12th July 1941
Turn 6
Central Front


3rd Army fail to fully activate so I cannot go on the attack against a couple of tempting lone divisions. 4th Army remain trapped in the Pripyat.

30th Army are lacking in AP's thanks to the shooting of the Army commander, but as they are unengaged at present that is not too much of an issue and they continue to sort themselves out along the river west of Gomel.

Finally 32nd Army cannot move due to another AP shortage and so stay in Orsha.

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (318.56 KiB) Viewed 490 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

12th July 1941
Turn 6
Southern Front


With the Axis forces firmly established over the Dneistr, the 12th, 9th and Southern HQ forces are in full retreat - but there is no natural obstacles to assist.

The survivors of Southwestern HQ continue to hold Vinnitsa-Zhitomir for as long as possible in order to give time to allow reinforcements...

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (282.01 KiB) Viewed 488 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
James Ward
Posts: 1163
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, USA

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by James Ward »

Another thing to remember is to blow bridges. That can really slow supplies later as the repair is random.
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: James Ward

Another thing to remember is to blow bridges. That can really slow supplies later as the repair is random.
warspite1

I haven't seen the card for this yet.

EDIT: I see why - Zhukov has to be on the hex with the bridge.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
KenchiSulla
Posts: 2956
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: the Netherlands

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by KenchiSulla »

No, Zhukov has to be in the HQ that controls units on the bridge hex....
AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Cannonfodder

No, Zhukov has to be in the HQ that controls units on the bridge hex....
warspite1

Ah okay. I see this in the manual. I will need to keep a check on this.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

16th July 1941
Turn 7


Good news and bad news: No Paranoia [:)]. But sadly no mud [:(]

From looking at the AI this seemed to be a turn largely of consolidation - with troops ominously moving up in both the Central and Southern Front sectors. The last defenders before the 'Mogilev Delta' were destroyed and I am being pressured in the south.

Right where are we:

Paranoia level is 0 - here is a breakdown of how that is made up (never looked at this before). It is clear that the Front Marshals are a major issue. It would be interesting to see how activation differs if I kept the useless Toadies and Apparatchiks in place.
Image

No front has priority

Troubleshooters remain where they are. I must look at Zhukov this turn and the blowing of bridges if possible.

Reinforcements:
42 divisions deployed
15 failed to deploy
4 HQ and 39 divisions pending deployment

Activation continues to be a mixed bag and remains stubbornly disappointing in the south where Zhukov is clearly doing a rubbish job..

North - 2 armies fully activated, 1 partially, 3 didn't. 4 Neutral
Central - 6 armies fully activated, 4 partially, 3 didn't. 11 Neutral
South - 2 armies fully activated, 4 partially, 0 didn't. 2 Neutral
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (132.05 KiB) Viewed 488 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

16th July 1941
Turn 7


Losses: Reflecting the impression that this was a consolidation turn, the losses for both sides were the lowest so far; only 9.6k for the Germans and 31.9k for the Soviets. German losses are the highest they have been so far (as a percentage of Soviet losses) 16.81%.

I suspect these numbers will be worse soon for the Soviets as the Germans have clearly been bringing troops up for an offensive - but if mud could make an appearance that would help!

Image

What reinforcements do I have and where to place them?

- 43rd Army in Orsha (MajGen Oborin - Initiative 5: Threat -2) [X(]

The remaining three are in the Southern Front
- 44th Army in Kiev (MajGen Rubtsev - Initiative 30: Threat 1) [:)]
- 46th Army in Nicolayev (MajGen Nikitin - Initiative 10: Threat -1)
- 45th Army in Perekop (MajGen Garnov - Initiative 30: Threat 1)

I take a chance with the placement of 44th and, particularly, 46th Army - perhaps it would have been wise to have been further back....

Next I place a fortification in the 'Mogilev Delta' behind the river.

I place a garrison in Pervomaisk.

I do not play the Partisan card.

For my 20pp pp I prioritise the Southern Front and demand no retreat from Kiev. I cannot help but feel I have been too late with Zhukov, but I place him with the 20th Army HQ anyway. If by some miracle I have control of the river line next turn (assuming he arrives) I will try blowing bridges. I send Kruschchev to Northern Front to spread some love and good cheer...

Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (93.3 KiB) Viewed 488 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

16th July 1941
Turn 7
Northern Front


Finland - thankfully - seems to have gone quiet (although I cannot do reconnaissance to confirm as my old 7th Army units still won't move).

The Germans keep their bridgehead over the Dvina. I can probably get one decent attack in. Do I attack the lone unit maintaining the bridgehead - or attack the two units of 18th Army to the east? The latter are out of command range and so it would be criminal not to attack here.

But I am greedy and go for broke [8|] - and then in my excitement press the wrong $%^&ing button! [:@] If I had a brain I would be dangerous...[&:]

I get this result having attacked with only three units

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (100.5 KiB) Viewed 488 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

16th July 1941
Turn 7
Northern Front


Having mucked that up I proceed with the next attack which is a) more difficult because there is an extra enemy unit in the stack and b) even if successful won't be as good because the Germans can retreat. Note to self: you are a schmuck.

I bring in my only available unit (27th Army did not fully activate [8|]) and prepare to attack the bridgehead. I have 4 divisions - the worst is at 91% readiness for a 213:81 with a 10% modifier.

I am happy with that but...oh what could have been if I had not lost control of my bodily functions....

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (101.65 KiB) Viewed 488 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42108
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Comrade Goofski - Barbarossa vs DicedT (No Diced T)

Post by warspite1 »

16th July 1941
Turn 7
Northern Front


And that brings the Northern Front to a close.

Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (300.63 KiB) Viewed 488 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”