Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Distant Worlds is a vast, pausable real-time, 4X space strategy game which models a "living galaxy" with incredible options for replayability and customizability. Experience the full depth and detail of large turn-based strategy games, but with the simplicity and ease of real-time, and on the scale of a massively-multiplayer online game. Now greatly enhanced with the new Universe release, which includes all four previous releases as well as the new Universe expansion!

Moderators: elliotg, Icemania

Aquitaine
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:01 am

Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Aquitaine »

In going through the various introductory tomes, guides, and videos, there is one subject that I can't quite wrap my head around: the function of star ports versus star bases.

I get that star ports have a special, built-in role as resource repositories and that you should 'not have too many of them' because otherwise freighters go berserk trying to fill all your starports. So many folks suggest builting starbases over every colony.

Some say make them as simple as possible - no weapons, just medical, recreation, docking. Others say put guns on every one of them.

Two questions:

1) How am I meant to know when I am 'ready' for another star port? I am on my 4th colony and my advisors are telling me to build a starport even though I just sent a construction ship to build a starbase instead. I assume I should ignore them because I only want a handful of starports throughout the game?

2) Static defenses on starbases or more ships? Is it more valuable to have your typical floating colony base be dirt cheap or versatile?

2a) Why is it important that the colony be able to build any kind of base at all right away - why not just follow my colony ship with a constructor ship and have it build a proper base over the colony?
User avatar
Unforeseen
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:08 am
Location: United States of Disease

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Unforeseen »

O : You've got em reversed, space ports are the ones you build around the planets. Star ports are the ones that can be built anywhere. Having a space port in key strategic locations, and in clusters with key resources surrounding it. Spaceports should act primarily as a hub and you have to ask yourself where such a "stash" would be most beneficial to your empire and easy to protect as well. They can also act as a strategic base in areas where you might need increased production capability, extra docking bays for refueling etc etc. Star Ports on the other hand are[if you design them yourself] capable of performing a multitude of different roles and are best built when you have a purpose in mind. I myself use them as checkpoint stations or bulk production.

1 : I sorta answered this in O. You just have to make a judgement call, it's not based on the number of planets but rather where they are and whether or not your current spaceport is at or nearing its maximum capacity.

2 : Depends on your play style. Whether you give these bases their own offensive abilities or not, always give them Point Defense weapons. I like to have at least 1 or 2 fighter bays as well.

2a : I don't understand the question.
necaradan666
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 3:32 am

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by necaradan666 »

You keep saying starports instead of star bases... Way to confuse the guy haha
User avatar
pycco
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 8:36 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by pycco »

ORIGINAL: Aquitaine

In going through the various introductory tomes, guides, and videos, there is one subject that I can't quite wrap my head around: the function of star ports versus star bases.

I get that star ports have a special, built-in role as resource repositories and that you should 'not have too many of them' because otherwise freighters go berserk trying to fill all your starports. So many folks suggest builting starbases over every colony.

Some say make them as simple as possible - no weapons, just medical, recreation, docking. Others say put guns on every one of them.

Two questions:

1) How am I meant to know when I am 'ready' for another star port? I am on my 4th colony and my advisors are telling me to build a starport even though I just sent a construction ship to build a starbase instead. I assume I should ignore them because I only want a handful of starports throughout the game?

2) Static defenses on starbases or more ships? Is it more valuable to have your typical floating colony base be dirt cheap or versatile?

2a) Why is it important that the colony be able to build any kind of base at all right away - why not just follow my colony ship with a constructor ship and have it build a proper base over the colony?

1. i build 1 space port per 4 sectors, the one above my HW is a massive construct. the HW port has all the research labs and 30+ construction yards. for the other planets i build a smaller port mainly for refueling, repairing and eases of transporting resources to build sites.
space ports tell the ai to stock pile resources at that location, if you'r empire is does not have enough resources it can lead to shortages, ships will be build at all space ports this will cause ships to be spread out when being built.

2. what each planet needs above them is a commerce center, recreation center, medical center. the rec and med centers give bonuses to the colony, the commerce center sells good from that world with out it you are giving resources away for free.

i build defensive bases above colonized planets, a bare bones module to get the bonuses ASAP.
once that is done i upgrade it to a defensive base with more guns and defenses. they can also house construction yards.

star bases and defensive bases are similar, the ai uses them in different roles. i use star bases as forward bases for a dependable location if i have to fall back and regroup,repair.
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
-Mark Twain
User avatar
Unforeseen
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:08 am
Location: United States of Disease

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Unforeseen »

ORIGINAL: necaradan666

You keep saying starports instead of star bases... Way to confuse the guy haha
:P I couldn't remember what it was called, i haven't played a game since i started stalling waiting for patches and modders to update their mods. So it's been months aside from a few short pirate games that i only played for like 1O to 2O minutes tops.
Emetivore
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 11:41 pm

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Emetivore »

Ok let me see if I understand..

You're saying to:

build one small star port per 4 sectors;
Build defensive bases with med/commerce/rec everywhere else;
And a large star port at home;
Star bases are only for military ops.

Is that right? This might be the key I've been missing so far! I've been building a small (tiny) star port above every single world, and those are exactly the problems I've been having in my games.
User avatar
pycco
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 8:36 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by pycco »

ORIGINAL: Emetivore

Ok let me see if I understand..

You're saying to:

build one small star port per 4 sectors;
Build defensive bases with med/commerce/rec everywhere else;
And a large star port at home;
Star bases are only for military ops.

Is that right? This might be the key I've been missing so far! I've been building a small (tiny) star port above every single world, and those are exactly the problems I've been having in my games.

that is what i do, some build a small space port in every system in the late game.i don't use any other space ports other than my HW one i really don't like my ships being constructed all over the place.by putting construction yards and manufacturing plants on any station to allow for repair as long as the station is above a planet it does not need cargo it will use the planet as a storage center.
you could build star ports instead of defensive bases that's your call, the effect would be the same as long as the components are the same.
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
-Mark Twain
User avatar
Spidey
Posts: 455
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:39 am

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Spidey »

1) How am I meant to know when I am 'ready' for another star port? I am on my 4th colony and my advisors are telling me to build a starport even though I just sent a construction ship to build a starbase instead. I assume I should ignore them because I only want a handful of starports throughout the game?
The way I see it, it's a question of resource clusters and distances. One space port can easily cover an entire sector, even with 50 mining stations and 20 colonies, assuming it has the construction capacity required for that task. But once we get more than a sector away from the space port, the distances begin getting a bit too long for my liking, particularly with early game tech. At that point I'll look towards getting a second space port, which means finding a good site for it.

In my opinion, a good space port system has most of the strategic resources in it, particularly fuel sources. If they're not in the system then at least they should be nearby. It's not too important that the port is floating over a great big population center, though of course the combination of a space port and a high population world provides for good and unimpeded colony ship construction.
2) Static defenses on starbases or more ships? Is it more valuable to have your typical floating colony base be dirt cheap or versatile?
Personally I like ships more than static defenses. If all your star bases are heavily fortified then you're paying maintenance for a lot of gear you're not really using. If you have ships instead, you can always repurpose them if the demand for a defense fleet changes.

That said, a few troops on exposed colonies is usually enough to fend off those single pirate frigate raids. And once my private sector gets going, my mining stations will be relatively sturdy.
2a) Why is it important that the colony be able to build any kind of base at all right away - why not just follow my colony ship with a constructor ship and have it build a proper base over the colony?
It isn't, IMO. Personally I even tend to let colonies go without bases for a while and then go through them every few years and order them to build as needed. Colonies get a happiness boost from med and rec facilities but I haven't seen any real growth impact, which means it's not really something I'm too concerned about providing ASAP.
Aquitaine
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:01 am

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Aquitaine »

ORIGINAL: pycco


1. i build 1 space port per 4 sectors, the one above my HW is a massive construct. the HW port has all the research labs and 30+ construction yards. for the other planets i build a smaller port mainly for refueling, repairing and eases of transporting resources to build sites.
space ports tell the ai to stock pile resources at that location, if you'r empire is does not have enough resources it can lead to shortages, ships will be build at all space ports this will cause ships to be spread out when being built.

2. what each planet needs above them is a commerce center, recreation center, medical center. the rec and med centers give bonuses to the colony, the commerce center sells good from that world with out it you are giving resources away for free.

i build defensive bases above colonized planets, a bare bones module to get the bonuses ASAP.
once that is done i upgrade it to a defensive base with more guns and defenses. they can also house construction yards.

star bases and defensive bases are similar, the ai uses them in different roles. i use star bases as forward bases for a dependable location if i have to fall back and regroup,repair.

Thank you! THat's pretty much what I was looking for. :)
User avatar
Tcby
Posts: 342
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 7:08 pm
Location: Australia

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Tcby »

I agree about med/rec facilities not being essential. Given that you won't be taxing new colonies, they aren't substantially benefited from recreational / medical facilities. They will already have close to maximum growth. They are useful for other reasons though. The increased happiness further improves the migration rate to that colony from other planets.

The extra docking bays that a base provides are a good reason for me to build them asap anyway. I don't like my freighters being held up.

Edit: forget that bit about the docking bays!
User avatar
Unforeseen
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:08 am
Location: United States of Disease

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Unforeseen »

Deleted
User avatar
pycco
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 8:36 pm
Location: United States of America
Contact:

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by pycco »

really you wait years to build a station interesting, happiness does not help population growth other than migrants?
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
-Mark Twain
User avatar
Tcby
Posts: 342
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 7:08 pm
Location: Australia

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Tcby »

Happiness does determine pop growth, but having 0% tax and access to the full complement of strategics is enough for max growth rate. Additional happiness is more useful when you want to tax more without harming growth rate. Or just tax more in general.

Prior to the change to growth rates you did get an improvement to growth rate by having those facilities. 0% wasn't enough to get max growth. Now it is, as far as I can tell.

Alternatively it could just be that
1) I use low growth races
2) Said rate is lower now
3) therefore the increase to pop growth is less than 1%, so I don't notice it anymore.

Difficulty may also have an impact on the amount of happiness you need to hit your max growth rate. That would in theory make those facilities more important at higher difficulties.

Short answer: I don't know for certain.
Bingeling
Posts: 5186
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:42 am

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Bingeling »

ORIGINAL: Tcby
The extra docking bays that a base provides are a good reason for me to build them asap anyway. I don't like my freighters being held up.
You haven't checked how many docking bays a colony got lately, have you? :)

It is 20, I think (since Shadows).

I doubt you will see docking queues on a colony that is not a capital with its spaceport busted. Except maybe at a former capital with no spaceport and a capital's worth of resources in store.
User avatar
Tcby
Posts: 342
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 7:08 pm
Location: Australia

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Tcby »

Heh! I knew it had been increased in one of the shadows mega patches, but thought it was something like 10. I retract my statement [:'(]
Kizucha
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2013 10:45 am

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Kizucha »

My big question about the discussion "space port vs star base" are with the commerce center's because i always think the bonus from it to the trade is only given if the trade is throug the station with the commerce center? If yes i dont get what i doing wrong, every time i build a star base with c.center and all the shiny things for colony's the freighters are not trade with the star base, they go direktly to the planet and trade there.[:(]
Gregorovitch55
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 10:36 am

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Gregorovitch55 »

An interesting thread but very confusing [&:]

Are these statements a fair summary of current knowledge about this:

1. The private sector AI is programmed to stock star ports with fuel but it is not programmed to stock defense bases and star bases with fuel. This is why there is a strong motivation to limit the number of star ports and distribute them strategically so that fuel is concentrated in places where you want it. Otherwise if you build star ports everywhere fuel will be diffused all around your systems leading to situations where there isn't enough of it where you need it to refuel your fleets quickly.

2. It is better to build star bases or defense bases around planets where you don't want fuel accumulated. The reasons to build them at all are: rec/med centres increase happiness so the colony can support higher tax rates (when you decide to tax it). A commence centre can be added to improve trade from the colony. Useful additional things like long range scanners can also be added.

3. Rather like ship designations (frigate, destroyer,cruiser etc) the AI uses star bases and defense bases for specific roles but if you design and deploy your own bases manually it makes no difference whether you use a star base or a defense base as an alternative to a star port for you colonies.

If these statements are accurate then the question that leaps out at me is this: exactly what effect do commerce centres have?
User avatar
Tcby
Posts: 342
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 7:08 pm
Location: Australia

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Tcby »

Point three is correct. Point 2 is..somewhat correct. Number 1 is incorrect.

The issue is not simply fuel related. If you have a starport (or more specifically, any base with construction yards), then the private sector will make sure that there are enough resources at that port to build large amounts of ships. Basically, they send a certain amount of all strategic resources to that base so that it won't immediately stall due to resources shortages when you issue a build order.

Players avoid building starports for this reason; it is easier to manage resources when the private sector isn't trying to spread them evenly across multiple locations. Also, its a pretty big deal that you can only build Bakuras is one location.
Bigtouf
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:30 am

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Bigtouf »

I used this post for my question :

Is it useless to put more than one commerce center in a station ?
And if we have no Trade agreement, can i've foreign trade ?


And for the thread, if i understant all purpose, it's intersting to settte star-port :
- in HW (To build fleets/ships)
- in distant sectors (To avoid very long refuel traval !)
- but not in all colony (To avoid high maintenance!)
?
User avatar
Tcby
Posts: 342
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2013 7:08 pm
Location: Australia

RE: Final Word: Starports vs. Starbses

Post by Tcby »

Answers inside quotation:
ORIGINAL: Bigtouf

I used this post for my question :

Is it useless to put more than one commerce center in a station ?
Yes, unless you are worried about it being attacked. If your commerce center is damaged it will not work. This is highly unlikely and easy to repair, though. I always use a single commerce center.
And if we have no Trade agreement, can i've foreign trade ?
Yes.Your private sector will trade anyway. Free trade agreements just give you (the state) bonus money equal to 20% of the money that your private sector is making from resource trades with that empire. Defense pacts give you 30%.


And for the thread, if i understant all purpose, it's intersting to settte star-port :
- in HW (To build fleets/ships)
- in distant sectors (To avoid very long refuel traval !)
- but not in all colony (To avoid high maintenance!)
?
Yes, that is right. But you can use gas mining stations, resupply ships, or star bases to help with refueling in distant sectors if you want.
Post Reply

Return to “Distant Worlds 1 Series”