OT: Carrier onboard delivery in WW2

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Buckrock
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:10 am
Location: Not all there

RE: OT: Carrier onboard delivery in WW2

Post by Buckrock »

ORIGINAL: wdolson
I've never seen much on any kind of COD effort during WW II, though mail was a high priority for morale purposes. I suspect some regular combat equipped Avengers were probably used as mail planes at various times, but it wasn't any kind of formal effort.
In WWII, while the Avenger was best suited to the task, the USN used pretty much any of their available multi-seat carrier aircraft (including SBDs and
SB2Cs) for quick delivery of personnel, mail or light stores/equipment to their CVs when underway. For urgent deliveries at sea that were too large for
these aircraft, destroyers were normally used as a go-between, loading from a base or other ship and then coming alongside for the carrier to hoist the
needed cargo aboard.

As an illustration of a DD delivery express, during the Okinawa Campaign when TF 58 was heavily engaged with air operations in April, the fleet's
destroyers were used to keep the carriers topped up with a constant flow of needed stores and equipment from the replenishment fleet to reduce
the need for the carriers themselves to leave their operational area to re-supply.

For example, TF 58.1's USS Bennington received almost 10 tons of ships stores, aircraft drop-tanks and aviation supplies from the USS McKee and
USS Mansfield between the 22nd and 23rd April after the destroyers had earlier taken on their cargo from TF 50.8 (Replenishment). And as the
report below indicates, the Bennington barely paused during such deliveries...

USS Benington (Chronological Log extract of 23 April 1945)
0834-0848.....Launched DCAP #2 (4VMF, 8VF) and Strike Baker (4VF, 12VB, 12 VT).
0851-0912.....Recovered TCAP #1 and 2 Divisions of DCAP #1, 20 planes.
0939-0951.....USS Mansfield alongside to transfer belly tanks and spare aviation parts.
1002-1004.....Launched TCAP #4 (8VMF, 4VF)

.....

I'm sure the USN would have appreciated specialised COD aircraft in WWII but it seems the DD Express Delivery Service was able to sufficiently
meet the navy's needs in the meantime.
This was the only sig line I could think of.
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24580
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: OT: Carrier onboard delivery in WW2

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury
besides I would be a bit scared of being close to one of these... you know... Oh, the humanity!

If memory suits, the US effectively cornered the market on production of Helium for its airships in WWII. Helium, being an 'inert' gas-and lighter than air-was a much safer choice.
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24580
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: OT: Carrier onboard delivery in WW2

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: rustysi
Not a problem. U.S. lighter than air vessels use helium, not hydrogen.

Gah! A day late (and a dollar short) in my reply. [;)]
Image
User avatar
bartrat
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 5:43 pm
Location: USA

RE: OT: Carrier onboard delivery in WW2

Post by bartrat »

Texas natural gas and oil fields are among the few places on planet earth that Helium can be extracted from; the USA in WW1 and WW2 had a monopoly on it.
WW2 logistics fanboy and
Rat Rancher
Rat ranching for fun and profit, had better be fun, cause there is no profit.
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: OT: Carrier onboard delivery in WW2

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

would it be safe to say that the Japanese also used DDs to deliver urgent cargo?

by the way, another nice picture of a blimp landed on a carrier

looks like those blimp-to-ship landings happened mostly from the late 20s, early to mid 30s.


Image
Attachments
ZPNK06.jpg
ZPNK06.jpg (50.1 KiB) Viewed 78 times
Buckrock
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:10 am
Location: Not all there

RE: OT: Carrier onboard delivery in WW2

Post by Buckrock »

It would be safe to say the Japanese would have enjoyed the additional flexibility of DD at-sea deliveries if they'd ever had decent
replenishment fleets or sufficiently stocked forward bases from which their destroyers could pilfer.

And so you like balloons now. What's next, the IJN's Replenishment Kite Service?
This was the only sig line I could think of.
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: OT: Carrier onboard delivery in WW2

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

why not?

Image
Attachments
20170403..Results.jpg
20170403..Results.jpg (69.97 KiB) Viewed 78 times
Buckrock
Posts: 676
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:10 am
Location: Not all there

RE: OT: Carrier onboard delivery in WW2

Post by Buckrock »

I just knew that photo was coming.[:)]
This was the only sig line I could think of.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”