INF without engineers build/expand base?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

morphin
Posts: 723
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2002 6:51 pm
Location: Switzerland

INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by morphin »

Hi
I have searched the forum. One member says that infantry without engineers can build fortifications up to 1 in a base (dot base hex). Can they also expand AF from O to 1? And has somebody seen that the fortifications raised to 1 (or higher) without any engineer? I just wonder if it is worth and how long it takes without any engineer to build fortifications
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 13888
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by btd64 »

You need engineers for any type of construction....GP
Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
SCW Manual Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton
bradfordkay
Posts: 8565
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by bradfordkay »

Level 1 fortifications are basically foxholes, barbed wire, and other temporary fortifications that can be created by infantry. Anything beyond that requires engineer squads.
fair winds,
Brad
Chris21wen
Posts: 7422
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by Chris21wen »

According to the manual they do but never been able to prove it. What I think it's trying to say is 'engineer units' and not simply 'engineers' as many units do have some engineer devives.

8.4.4 Ground Units and Fortifications
Ground units that are in a base/beach hex assume the fortification level of the base/beach, except for units that have a separate fortification level set at the
start of a scenario. Ground units that are not in a base/beach and are not moving will automatically attempt to build fortifications to protect themselves from
attacking enemy ground units. Engineers in the hex will help in the building of these fortifications. Engineers will only provide this help if the Engineer is in
Combat OpMode and does not have a Destination. Although units without the help of engineers can build fortifications, the work will proceed very slowly.


This appears to be but it has 4 engineer devices.
Screenshot 2025-05-27 074711.jpg
Screenshot 2025-05-27 074711.jpg (19.3 KiB) Viewed 296 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17575
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by RangerJoe »

Units without engineers can only build forts/fortifications when not in a base.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10261
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by PaxMondo »

RangerJoe wrote: Tue May 27, 2025 10:53 am Units without engineers can only build forts/fortifications when not in a base.

Correct. You see this as IJ player with the Thai units. no engrs, but in jungle hexes they will build forts up to level 3. Never seen more than level 3.

:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
Pax
morphin
Posts: 723
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2002 6:51 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by morphin »

ok . Thank's. I have found old threats... It is now clear that enginneer (squads) are needed to expand bases.

Here is a link i just found. Fortifications in a base need engineer too:

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... s&start=20
User avatar
dasboot1960
Posts: 437
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: St Augustine, Florida

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by dasboot1960 »

I believe I have seen this to fort level 1 in game starts where auto upgrade is on. Specifically, US bases Palmyra Johnston - that bunch. Can't prove it (test what?). I'm not beyond being flat wrong.
Down like a CLOWN!
Chris21wen
Posts: 7422
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by Chris21wen »

RangerJoe wrote: Tue May 27, 2025 10:53 am Units without engineers can only build forts/fortifications when not in a base.
v26b

There's a problem here, either it's incorrect or it's just the info being dispayed is incorrectly. If it is correct it implies engineers are required to build any forts? Thats wrong so I hope it's a display error.

In the pic posted earlier notice the 'Building' after the forts. This to me indicates it is has dug in and is expanding to max fort level of 3. It has engineer devices.

This one does not have any engineer devices and shows no indiation that it is digging in, e.g. it does not say 'building'. I have check the only othe other location I can find where there are no engineers present and that is the same.
Screenshot 2025-05-29 082707.jpg
Screenshot 2025-05-29 082707.jpg (22.03 KiB) Viewed 165 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17575
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by RangerJoe »

Chris21wen wrote: Thu May 29, 2025 7:45 am
RangerJoe wrote: Tue May 27, 2025 10:53 am Units without engineers can only build forts/fortifications when not in a base.
v26b

There's a problem here, either it's incorrect or it's just the info being dispayed is incorrectly. If it is correct it implies engineers are required to build any forts? Thats wrong so I hope it's a display error.

In the pic posted earlier notice the 'Building' after the forts. This to me indicates it is has dug in and is expanding to max fort level of 3. It has engineer devices.

This one does not have any engineer devices and shows no indiation that it is digging in, e.g. it does not say 'building'. I have check the only othe other location I can find where there are no engineers present and that is the same.

Screenshot 2025-05-29 082707.jpg
Without opening the game, if that unit is not in a base then it can build forts. It can build them up to level 6. The smaller units seem to build them faster, the large units unless broken down have a harder time getting past level 2. If the units are broken into thirds, when they recombine they can keep forts but not at the highest level of any third. It is usually the lowest of the 3 unless one is not fortified.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10261
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by PaxMondo »

dasboot1960 wrote: Wed May 28, 2025 10:03 pm I believe I have seen this to fort level 1 in game starts where auto upgrade is on. Specifically, US bases Palmyra Johnston - that bunch. Can't prove it (test what?). I'm not beyond being flat wrong.
In a base, everything that I know and have seen, is that you need engineers to build fortifications. At least one engineer type squad.

In Scen001, Palmyra starts with Fortification 0 and 2 units. In particular this one:
Screenshot 2025-05-29 042745.jpg
Screenshot 2025-05-29 042745.jpg (80.27 KiB) Viewed 149 times
With the engineering units contained, this base will be able to build fortifications.
Pax
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10261
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by PaxMondo »

Now, going back to non-base fortifications which Alfred referred to as entrenchment (nice distinction). I ran a test (love the newer laptops with tons of speed and RAM, spin 10 turns in just a few minutes).

Test location:
Screenshot 2025-05-29 052938.jpg
Screenshot 2025-05-29 052938.jpg (21.57 KiB) Viewed 143 times
Here is a unit without Engr that now has level 1 forts:
Screenshot 2025-05-29 053100.jpg
Screenshot 2025-05-29 053100.jpg (87.5 KiB) Viewed 143 times
Note the lack of Engr squads, BUT there is TOE for them ....

For this test, I actually sent 5 units to the hex. Only 2 have forts built after 10 turns. Still, you can see that it can (does) happen.

:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
Pax
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10261
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by PaxMondo »

After +60 turns, only at forts 2, still no engr squads present.
Screenshot 2025-05-29 065253.jpg
Screenshot 2025-05-29 065253.jpg (84.43 KiB) Viewed 136 times
Pax
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10261
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by PaxMondo »

Separate test, unit has no engr squads AND has no TOE for any engr squads.

Located here:
Screenshot 2025-05-29 065106.jpg
Screenshot 2025-05-29 065106.jpg (10.91 KiB) Viewed 135 times
And after + 60 turns no forts.
Screenshot 2025-05-29 065142.jpg
Screenshot 2025-05-29 065142.jpg (84.26 KiB) Viewed 135 times
Pax
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17575
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by RangerJoe »

PaxMondo wrote: Thu May 29, 2025 12:35 pm Now, going back to non-base fortifications which Alfred referred to as entrenchment (nice distinction). I ran a test (love the newer laptops with tons of speed and RAM, spin 10 turns in just a few minutes).

Test location:
Screenshot 2025-05-29 052938.jpg

Here is a unit without Engr that now has level 1 forts:
Screenshot 2025-05-29 053100.jpg
Note the lack of Engr squads, BUT there is TOE for them ....

For this test, I actually sent 5 units to the hex. Only 2 have forts built after 10 turns. Still, you can see that it can (does) happen.

:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
If you divided that division into thirds, the forts will be built faster. Then when you combine them, they will at least have the lowest level of fort for all of the subunits if they have at least had a level 1 fort. Sometimes, the entire unit will get a fort level even if one third does not have one but the other units have at least a level 1 fort. I have not tested this so I don't know the limits.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10261
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by PaxMondo »

OK, so in summary what do we know.

First, Alfred posted this:
https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 0#p2621900

For those of you new who don't know Alfred, and as a reminder to the rest of us; there are 3 things about Alfred that you need to know:
1. Alfred is NEVER WRONG. He is so thorough in his research. I can do a fair job of online searching, but in comparison I am stumbling while Alfred flies.

2. Alfred had a connection to Henderson. Exactly what, I don't know, but he did. I don't find his name in the credits (maybe I'm blind or an alias), so he wasn't an official dev, but he clearly had some form of access.

Taking these two things in conjunction with my test results, here are my conclusions about entrenchment:
1. It takes engineers to entrench a unit in a non-base hex.
2. The apparent max level of entrenchment is 3.
3. The engineer squads only need be part of the TOE.

I think this last one was a dev oops, I believe that they intended engr squads to be needed, but looked at the TOE variable instead of what it actually present. Depending upon the naming convention being used, easy to do, but hard to spot. Given this observation, I believe this how Alfred made his conclusion in his Fortification 101 treatise. The devs intended that only engr could entrench, and this IS true. But I suspect not exactly how they intended. Close though. Rare cases to find the exception.

This is as definitive as I can do. Remember, I am not a dev, have never seen the code, and this is all based upon empirical testing.

3rd thing about Alfred: WE MISS HIM!!!!!

:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
Pax
Chris21wen
Posts: 7422
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by Chris21wen »

PaxMondo wrote: Thu May 29, 2025 2:11 pm OK, so in summary what do we know.
......

Taking these two things in conjunction with my test results, here are my conclusions about entrenchment:
1. It takes engineers to entrench a unit in a non-base hex.
2. The apparent max level of entrenchment is 3.
3. The engineer squads only need be part of the TOE.

I think this last one was a dev oops, I believe that they intended engr squads to be needed, but looked at the TOE variable instead of what it actually present. Depending upon the naming convention being used, easy to do, but hard to spot. Given this observation, I believe this how Alfred made his conclusion in his Fortification 101 treatise. The devs intended that only engr could entrench, and this IS true. But I suspect not exactly how they intended. Close though. Rare cases to find the exception.

This is as definitive as I can do. Remember, I am not a dev, have never seen the code, and this is all based upon empirical testing.

3rd thing about Alfred: WE MISS HIM!!!!!

:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
More or less the conclusion I came too, unless it is a display error.

I do disagree that engineer should be needed to dig in, any squaddie can dig a hole.
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10261
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by PaxMondo »

Chris21wen wrote: Fri May 30, 2025 8:00 am ...
I do disagree that engineer should be needed to dig in, any squaddie can dig a hole.
That would level 1 entrenchment: foxhole. So sure.

Above that? berms etc. Squaddies could help, but they need direction. I think the engineer requirement pretty sound, and while it is definitely a mix of work in some armies, in others not so much. The coding complexity I don't think worth the effort. In simplest form, I think you say you need engineers.


:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
Pax
User avatar
821Bobo
Posts: 2410
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:20 pm
Location: Slovakia

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by 821Bobo »

2. The apparent max level of entrenchment is 3.
Not true. From my game
fort.jpg
fort.jpg (127.94 KiB) Viewed 69 times
You can get at least to 6(not seen in picture but I do have level 6 dug in Chinese), but I guess even 9 is possible given enough time and engineers heavy unit.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17575
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

Re: INF without engineers build/expand base?

Post by RangerJoe »

821Bobo wrote: Fri May 30, 2025 2:40 pm
2. The apparent max level of entrenchment is 3.
Not true. From my game

fort.jpg

You can get at least to 6(not seen in picture but I do have level 6 dug in Chinese), but I guess even 9 is possible given enough time and engineers heavy unit.
I think that level 6 is the highest outside of a base. In a base you need lots of supplies, engineers, and time.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”