US Para Rgt

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Chris21wen
Posts: 7422
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

US Para Rgt

Post by Chris21wen »

I've just dropped the 503rd on Wau, everthing went fine except for the 3 US Cbombat Eng Sqd which won't. Seems there are not transportable by plane.

Seems pointless to have para units if part of the unit can't be dropped as paras. This has really annoyed so what the logic behind it or is it an oversite?
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: Chris H

I've just dropped the 503rd on Wau, everthing went fine except for the 3 US Cbombat Eng Sqd which won't. Seems there are not transportable by plane.

Seems pointless to have para units if part of the unit can't be dropped as paras. This has really annoyed so what the logic behind it or is it an oversite?

It's very hard to make all the details realistic, and I'm not sure you want too much realism--you might not be able to figure out why things happened. The combat environment is one of those things like the brain where you really can't grasp how things happen.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
jrcar
Posts: 2301
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:16 pm
Location: Seymour, Australia

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by jrcar »

Chris what transports did you use?

I'm pretty sure I have done it fine with C-47/DC2/3's... I'll try and check my turn files on my other computer.

Cheers

Rob
AE BETA Breaker
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by michaelm75au »

The load cost of the US Combat Engineer is 10 (from scen #1). This can't be dropped by plane for 2 reasons; only squads or non-squads of load cost 6 or less. This was from the original stock and the only bug fixes were made to the original code.

However they can be moved to that base once the base/AF is secured.
[restrictions for moving are non-squad or non-engineer devices with a load cost of 8 or less.]
Michael
jrcar
Posts: 2301
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:16 pm
Location: Seymour, Australia

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by jrcar »

Yep checked, the unit took the base then the engineers flew in once the base was mine.

Cheers

Rob
AE BETA Breaker
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: Chris H

I've just dropped the 503rd on Wau, everthing went fine except for the 3 US Cbombat Eng Sqd which won't. Seems there are not transportable by plane.

Seems pointless to have para units if part of the unit can't be dropped as paras. This has really annoyed so what the logic behind it or is it an oversite?


I have airlifted all US paras several times, every time with the engineers. According to michaelm´s post this shouldn´t be possible and this is also what happens in Chris´ example so I wonder why it works just perfectly in my PBEM?

edit: sorry, misread michaelm´s post. Thought they weren´t "air transportable" while you just can´t drop them. Could be that I flew them in later, even though I can´t really remember doing that in an extra turn all the time. [&:] Which makes me even more wonder as I usually took dot bases with the paras so flying them in without dropping them wouldn´t work at a dot base.
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by michaelm75au »

Would work if you used float planes like Catalina.
Michael
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Would work if you used float planes like Catalina.

hmm, I didn´t. Always used C-47 (USAAF and USMC). [&:] Will have a closer look next time I take a dot base but so far I´ve always had everything where I wanted it.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by witpqs »

I'm 99% sure they flew in for me too. Next time I'll check, but IIRC I did check to see that all of the unit made it in for the assault turn.
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by michaelm75au »

I just tried dropping the 1st USMC Parachute Bn unit on a dot base using a C-47 group. The Para squads with some support and MMG squads dropped and captured the 'dot' base. But the C-47 group changed to Supply missions after dropping these squads. The heavy guns and Engineers stayed at the original base.

I could however move them using the Catalinas.

Doing the same thing but using the Cats to begin with, the 'dot' base was captured and the Cats moved in the remainder of the battalion before switching to Supply.

[EDIT]
Tried this again, and the C-47 group moved the remainder of battalion to the 'dot' base. This shouldn't be allowed, but the code is not checking the SIZE of the AF before it moved the devices.
Michael
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by witpqs »

I didn't think the USMC para Bns had any heavy guns?

Anyway, I never realized that combat engineer squads were not intended to be para-dropped. I guess I don't understand why not - weren't they organic to some para units so that they could be dropped?
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: michaelm

I just tried dropping the 1st USMC Parachute Bn unit on a dot base using a C-47 group. The Para squads with some support and MMG squads dropped and captured the 'dot' base. But the C-47 group changed to Supply missions after dropping these squads. The heavy guns and Engineers stayed at the original base.

I could however move them using the Catalinas.

Doing the same thing but using the Cats to begin with, the 'dot' base was captured and the Cats moved in the remainder of the battalion before switching to Supply.

[EDIT]
Tried this again, and the C-47 group moved the remainder of battalion to the 'dot' base. This shouldn't be allowed, but the code is not checking the SIZE of the AF before it moved the devices.



have you tried it with a couple of squadrons at the same time? I usually use some 60-70 C-47 per unit with some of them automatically dropping supplies (all ordered to carry troops) and the rest is dropping the paras. Then everything is where I want it to be. If this doesn´t work for you then I don´t know what I´m doing different. Anyway, am going to check that next time to provide a safe or at least comment on it if it also isn´t working.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by witpqs »

Come to think of it, I remember their being discussion a long while back with developers on the forum about making sure that everything that was actually "droppable" (my word [:D]) was droppable in the game.
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Come to think of it, I remember their being discussion a long while back with developers on the forum about making sure that everything that was actually "droppable" (my word [:D]) was droppable in the game.

Originally, I was going to set an attribute to indicate if a device could be air-dropped or air-transported. But this missed the original design and I never followed it up. This would have bypassed the question of 'is it too big?'. [:D]
Michael
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

I didn't think the USMC para Bns had any heavy guns?

Anyway, I never realized that combat engineer squads were not intended to be para-dropped. I guess I don't understand why not - weren't they organic to some para units so that they could be dropped?

75mm pack howitzer guns
Michael
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: michaelm

ORIGINAL: witpqs

I didn't think the USMC para Bns had any heavy guns?

Anyway, I never realized that combat engineer squads were not intended to be para-dropped. I guess I don't understand why not - weren't they organic to some para units so that they could be dropped?

75mm pack howitzer guns


hmm, that´s the next thing that makes me [&:] I have used my paras quite a lot already being in late 43 but can´t remember ever having seen them with these guns.
Chris21wen
Posts: 7422
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cottesmore, Rutland

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by Chris21wen »

ORIGINAL: michaelm

ORIGINAL: witpqs

I didn't think the USMC para Bns had any heavy guns?

Anyway, I never realized that combat engineer squads were not intended to be para-dropped. I guess I don't understand why not - weren't they organic to some para units so that they could be dropped?

75mm pack howitzer guns

In 42 a US Para Rgt consists of
57 x Para Sqd - load 10 each
3 x Cmbt Eng - load 10 each
12 x 81mm mtr - load 4 each
58 x Support - load 10 each

In 44 they also get
8 x HMG - load 5 each
and support is increased to 61

Info taken from tracker.

ORIGINAL: michaelm

The load cost of the US Combat Engineer is 10 (from scen #1). This can't be dropped by plane for 2 reasons; only squads or non-squads of load cost 6 or less. This was from the original stock and the only bug fixes were made to the original code.

However they can be moved to that base once the base/AF is secured.
[restrictions for moving are non-squad or non-engineer devices with a load cost of 8 or less.]

I'm confused for the reason above.


User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by michaelm75au »

A squad-type device can be dropped regardless of load cost. That covers the Para Squad and Support.

A Combat Engineer is not a squad, but an engineer-type device. As such it is constrained by the load cost limit of 7 or less to drop.

The 81mm mortar is an army weapon-type device but it can be dropped as the load cost is 7 or less.

The HMG is a squad-type device so can be dropped.

However, the Combat Engineer can be moved between friendly bases as squad and engineer types are not limited by load cost.

Noticed error in this statement.
However they can be moved to that base once the base/AF is secured.
[restrictions for moving are non-squad or non-engineer devices with a load cost of 9 or less.]
Michael
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by witpqs »

I thought the point about the pack howitzers was that they were more easily transportable, even by parachute?

Sorry I don't have a link to the old discussion. I'll see if I can find it later.
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: US Para Rgt

Post by michaelm75au »

I can only go by what is in the editor. The load cost is 9 for the 75mm pack howitzer.

Actually, I notice that the 75mm's are in the USMC Para Bn in Guadalcanal scenario. It doesn't look like that these devices are part of the normal OOB for those units, though. So they may be there as the troops are being used in shore assault mode rather than being dropped.




Michael
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”