Turn 83
Austria-Hungry
Here's where the game get's more funky.. Argentum had "
accepted"

AH's surrender knowing all the circumstances surrounding it (as I explained in prior post #79), now he is declaring war on AH (
no fault of their own) once again. Which I kind of feel is "cheesy" [:-]. So all I can imagine is that he sees he has a logistic problem getting his armies and so forth to Bulgaria and Turkey and wanted the match over before the 118th turn, for there is this one category left in the victory conditions panel which is: "Defeat all enemies before Jan 1, 1919", which he questionably might not achieve, although should have been able to achieve with out DOW AH. Also he may have realized the mistake in accepting AH's surrender in the first place, but the deed was done, thus causing Bulgaria and Turkey's NM to sink -30 or -35 NM making it all that easier for them to submit to surrender..

I have no problem with a Belgian or Serb surrender being violated (by CP) for by then there is little or no assets involved, but with nations like AH and Germany there are huge assets that are sacrificed, such as their navies and units that were currently in the production queue at the time of the accepted surrender, never mind their loss of alliance. The same could be said for the Entente if the chips were down for them.. Should add this too: A surrendered nation also losses all captured territory which is repatriated to it's original owners..
I'd like to hear others opinions on this subject..
