Carrier Battles - Successor to Carriers At War?

Carriers At War is Strategic Studies Group famed simulation of Fleet Carrier Air and Naval Operations in the Pacific from 1941 - 1945.

Moderators: alexs, Gregor_SSG

Post Reply
bink
Posts: 149
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 am

Carrier Battles - Successor to Carriers At War?

Post by bink »

Hi,

I am looking forward to Carrier Battles, since there is no more work on Carriers At War (e.g. the expansion never materialised). This is a port of the iPad game to the Mac/PC.

Website

You Tube Video

Steam

If it doesn't cover all the original Carriers At War scenarios, maybe there will be the ability to add user scenarios?
User avatar
ncc1701e
Posts: 10694
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 7:50 pm
Location: Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards

RE: Carrier Battles - Successor to Carriers At War?

Post by ncc1701e »

Looks interesting, thanks for sharing.
Chancellor Gorkon to Captain James T. Kirk:
You don't trust me, do you? I don't blame you. If there is to be a brave new world, our generation is going to have the hardest time living in it.
Propitious Crane
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 9:14 am

RE: Carrier Battles - Successor to Carriers At War?

Post by Propitious Crane »

Yes it does. I do wonder if you can edit the scenarios though. That was one of the better things about CAW, although one really irritating feature of the CAW mission editor was how much that could be automated had to be manually coded.

For example, if you create a new carrier or airbase and assign squadrons to it, you have to manually type in the inner and outer strike limit ranges and times when those apply. As the ranges are known from the plane type in each squadron, and its day/night capability likewise, and dusk / dawn times are in the scenario setup, all those fields could surely be populated by looking values up from elsewhere.

The same applies to things like whether surface formations are likely to fight or not. This is largely a function of whether they contain carriers, seaplane tenders or merchants, so again it could be default value based on task group composition.

The single worst change made between the old DOS and Windows versions of CAW was that in the latter control of what aircraft flew CAP was taken away. If you have a carrier equipped with say 9 Sea Hurricanes and 12 Fulmars, you probably want the former flying CAP because short range and 4 x 20mm cannon, and the latter accompanying strikes because longer-range. You're as likely to find that you have no fighters with the range to accompany a strike, because you set CAP to 10/21 and the AI has assigned 10 of the 12 Fulmars to the CAP leaving you only the 9 Hurricanes, which can't reach the target.

You Swordfish strike duly gets slaughtered and it's game over.

User avatar
Rasputitsa
Posts: 2902
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Bedfordshire UK
Contact:

RE: Carrier Battles - Successor to Carriers At War?

Post by Rasputitsa »

Thanks for the links, as this game was a surprise to me.

Went onto the website to see that 'Carrier Battles' was to be released in 2hrs, on that day.

Good timing, got the game, which is looking very good.[8D]
"In politics stupidity is not a handicap" - Napoleon

“A people which is able to say everything becomes able to do everything” - Napoleon

“Among those who dislike oppression are many who like to oppress" - Napoleon
surfcandy
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 6:44 am

RE: Carrier Battles - Successor to Carriers At War?

Post by surfcandy »

It's actually pretty good game.
User avatar
ATCSMike
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 4:49 am
Location: Edmond, OK

RE: Carrier Battles - Successor to Carriers At War?

Post by ATCSMike »

Read the battles to be included. Reminds me of the old DOS "Carrier Strike". On my wish list now.
'Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati'
("When all else fails, play DEAD")

United States Navy 1979-1982
Retired Aviation Machinists Mate 2nd Class
VT-23, HS-1, USS Carl Vinson CVN70 (Plank Owner)
Retired Air Traffic Control Specialist (ATCS)
Curt1956
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2020 12:48 pm

RE: Carrier Battles - Successor to Carriers At War?

Post by Curt1956 »

It plays well. Developer continues to updaate
Post Reply

Return to “Carriers At War”