Comments on the Forlon Hopes AAR's. John3rd and Canoerebel not allowed

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
String
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Estonia

Comments on the Forlon Hopes AAR's. John3rd and Canoerebel not allowed

Post by String »





This thread is meant for the readers of both AAR's.


If you for some reason read only one AAR, such as providing John3rd with assistance and advice, please stop here.

For others, please comment and read as you wish :)













Surface combat TF fanboy
User avatar
String
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Estonia

RE: Comments on the Forlon Hopes AAR's. John3rd and Canoerebel not allowed

Post by String »

I must say that when I read the last post by Canoerebel I almost laughed out loud. I can only imagine how close john's invasion fleets and Canoerebels carriers must have passed eachother when he transferred them in from Coral Sea.

These are truly exiting times. I wonder how CR will react when he discovers the indian invasion.
Surface combat TF fanboy
MrPlow9
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:42 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

RE: Comments on the Forlon Hopes AAR's. John3rd and Canoerebel not allowed

Post by MrPlow9 »

No offense, but I don't know if this thread is such a good idea. I would hate to see this thread somehow cause a breach in operational security for either side, and ruin such an awesome PBEM game.
Image
Alikchi2
Posts: 1786
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:29 pm
Contact:

RE: Comments on the Forlon Hopes AAR's. John3rd and Canoerebel not allowed

Post by Alikchi2 »

ORIGINAL: String

I must say that when I read the last post by Canoerebel I almost laughed out loud. I can only imagine how close john's invasion fleets and Canoerebels carriers must have passed eachother when he transferred them in from Coral Sea.

These are truly exiting times. I wonder how CR will react when he discovers the indian invasion.


LOL I had the same reaction. Wouldn't that have been interesting? Course those 4-6 Allied CVs are probably a good match for the KB, and if they stay at Singapore, they're at a good reaction range.
Mistmatz
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:56 pm

RE: Comments on the Forlon Hopes AAR's. John3rd and Canoerebel not allowed

Post by Mistmatz »

ORIGINAL: MrPlow9

No offense, but I don't know if this thread is such a good idea. I would hate to see this thread somehow cause a breach in operational security for either side, and ruin such an awesome PBEM game.


I really like the idea behind this thread but I second MrPlow9's fear for security breeches.

String maybe you can ask the two players for permission and a posting in the respective thread to make this as safe as possible.
If you gained knowledge through the forum, why not putting it into the AE wiki?

http://witp-ae.wikia.com/wiki/War_in_th ... ition_Wiki

User avatar
String
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Estonia

RE: Comments on the Forlon Hopes AAR's. John3rd and Canoerebel not allowed

Post by String »

ORIGINAL: MrPlow9

No offense, but I don't know if this thread is such a good idea. I would hate to see this thread somehow cause a breach in operational security for either side, and ruin such an awesome PBEM game.

How would that happen in a way that couldn't happen before? I specifically stated in the title that neither player should read this thread. Also, in the first post I specified that those reading only one AAR for security reasons should also not read this thread.

How is that any different from not reading your opponents AAR I fail see.

edit: Apparently what I wrote in the first post wasn't large and red enough for the readers to notice. I hope it is so now.
Surface combat TF fanboy
Alikchi2
Posts: 1786
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:29 pm
Contact:

RE: Comments on the Forlon Hopes AAR's. John3rd and Canoerebel not allowed

Post by Alikchi2 »

We've already had commenters who post too much in either previous thread. This will minimize that by giving a place to comment when you're unsure whether it would be fair or not.
User avatar
String
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Estonia

RE: Comments on the Forlon Hopes AAR's. John3rd and Canoerebel not allowed

Post by String »

ORIGINAL: Alikchi

We've already had commenters who post too much in either previous thread. This will minimize that by giving a place to comment when you're unsure whether it would be fair or not.

Indeed. I read both AAR's and I often feel that I cannot comment too much without giving away something important. Thus I've only limited myself to giving advice on specific gameplay mechanics and/or pointing out obvious technical mistakes, such as the fact that sweeping a hex has no effect on transports flying to or from that hex.
Surface combat TF fanboy
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”