confusion about chits

[metabagel]

I can sometimes miss obvious things, so it could just be me, but I was initially confused about the chits for diplomacy and research. I thought when you clicked the up arrow or down arrow, you were changing a commitment to spend every turn. I haven't played Strategic Command games before, so that's probably the source of my confusion.

In retrospect, it makes sense. You are purchasing a chit which represents a one-time investment. When you click the down arrow, you are asked if you would like to get 50% of your investment back.

I'm loving the game, by the way. It really grows on you. Initially, I wasn't sure I liked the music, but now I quite enjoy it and I find that it fits the game rather well.

I have only played single-player, but looking forward to playing a real person at some point.

[PvtBenjamin]

I've only played a few turns in MP but agree the game has a great feel and potential.

I'd hold off on MP ('61 scenario) until its modified. The North starts with a far superior Navy, gets 500MPP more per turn (I guess it goes to 800 in '63) and has outstanding amphibious ability. Having played SC extensively I just can't imagine the South has much of a chance against an experienced player. Only if you played a new knucklehead like me would be the only chance of winning as the South.

If you have any more questions you'll find the group here very helpful.

[Yogol]

I thought when you clicked the up arrow or down arrow, you were changing a commitment to spend every turn.

It's been like that forever, so I never questioned it, but I agree that that would make more sense.
The same for buying units, now that I think about it!

[Twotribes]

for research the chits you buy are there every turn until you advance the research then one goes away