The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
Moderator: Joel Billings
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
So where has this one ended up?
- HardLuckYetAgain
- Posts: 9123
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:26 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
JB is on "Holiday" for a few weeks is what Vet told me over discord a day or so ago.
German Turn 1 opening moves. https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 1&t=390004
A nice post, thank you K62.
https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 4#p5114154
A nice post, thank you K62.
https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 4#p5114154
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
Yeah JB has been on holidays but we're certainly continuing this AAR!
Turn 7 Soviets
The stalling tactics at Leningrad seemed to have worked as this turn was largely rebuilding supply and CPP by the looks of it. The west bank of the Narva is cleared for ~20k Soviet losses. Interestingly both RFFS brigades are attached to units in the area. It’s likely he’ll be able to cross in the next turn or 2 as I don’t have many fort levels here but it’s important, I try and hold or it could unhinge my Leningrad defences at Luga.
The centre probably remains the most critical sector at the moment with JB concentrating his forces for a push towards Vyzama and Rzhev. Unfortunately, I’m almost out of favourable terrain to defend on so next few turns will be costly. He also has the option of moving south between the swamps to encircle my frontline west of Smolensk so I may need to abandon part of that defence this turn or next.
With Axis forces breaking out from their bridgeheads on the Dnepr, I’ll likely need to pull back from Kiev very soon.
Interestingly no advancing towards Crimea at all allowing me plenty of time to improve my defences
Turn 7 Soviets
The stalling tactics at Leningrad seemed to have worked as this turn was largely rebuilding supply and CPP by the looks of it. The west bank of the Narva is cleared for ~20k Soviet losses. Interestingly both RFFS brigades are attached to units in the area. It’s likely he’ll be able to cross in the next turn or 2 as I don’t have many fort levels here but it’s important, I try and hold or it could unhinge my Leningrad defences at Luga.
The centre probably remains the most critical sector at the moment with JB concentrating his forces for a push towards Vyzama and Rzhev. Unfortunately, I’m almost out of favourable terrain to defend on so next few turns will be costly. He also has the option of moving south between the swamps to encircle my frontline west of Smolensk so I may need to abandon part of that defence this turn or next.
With Axis forces breaking out from their bridgeheads on the Dnepr, I’ll likely need to pull back from Kiev very soon.
Interestingly no advancing towards Crimea at all allowing me plenty of time to improve my defences
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T7 Soviet
Soviets have been lucky with the weather around Leningrad. A few turns of sporadic rain but hopefully I can get 2 turns in a row so light mud covers most of that front.
I haven’t finished moving all my units but I’ve done a lot of repositioning. From this salient he could push north towards Rhzev, east towards Vyzama or pivot south to encircle my strongpoints in the swamps. I’ve had to try and accommodate all possibilities this turn which isn’t ideal but from next turn I should have a better idea what his goals are. I’ve had to weaken my line directly east and south east of Smolensk to strengthen Vyzama as well as mitigate risk from a large encirclement.
Soviets have been lucky with the weather around Leningrad. A few turns of sporadic rain but hopefully I can get 2 turns in a row so light mud covers most of that front.
I haven’t finished moving all my units but I’ve done a lot of repositioning. From this salient he could push north towards Rhzev, east towards Vyzama or pivot south to encircle my strongpoints in the swamps. I’ve had to try and accommodate all possibilities this turn which isn’t ideal but from next turn I should have a better idea what his goals are. I’ve had to weaken my line directly east and south east of Smolensk to strengthen Vyzama as well as mitigate risk from a large encirclement.
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
I've returned, so this ARR should begin to pick up pace again.
T8
Usually by turn 8, the Axis logistics are beginning to strain and the offensive diminishes. In this game I have managed my logistics and marshalled my forces in such a way that a 'fresh' offensive can now be launched from starting positions that are already deep within Russia. This will be a lengthy turn as a result to cover as coordinated assaults are made by AGN, AGC and AGS. Hopefully these will really press the Soviet defences and provide Vet with some difficult decisions.
Realistically I do not expect to take Moscow or even Leningrad against a skilled player in 1941, especially with TBs open. I am coming around to the conclusion that open TBs are a big benefit for the Axis, but the early arrival of an additional 30+ Soviet divisions from the TB means that it is very hard for the Axis to win in '41. Therefore my objectives in this game versus a very able opponent is to force the Russians to give battle, ideally on terrain of my choosing and destroy large parts of the Red Army. This should leave a Red Army of manageable proportions that can be crushed in 1942.
Originally I had little intention to press in the north, but with Vet's abandon the Baltics strategy I find myself thinking about whether I can take Leningrad. However, the weather has turned and the forecast is worse still with rain threatening almost the entire front
While light mud has a bearable impact on fighting strength (usually at around 75% efficiency) what really hurts is the impact on movement. This limits advances (it costs IDs 4 MPs to capture muddy ground, rather than 3 MP) and slows supply replenishment.
Flying NP over the Baltic has preserved my Baltic merchant fleet till now
The rain will make this operation very difficult. Fortunately with 13 operational ships, I am in a position where I can afford to suffer losses from my merchant fleet.
My rail network is coming along nicely and I am beginning to 'pulse' supply forward from intermediate supply stashes.
I have amassed some 60k tons of supply in Warsaw. By dropping supply priority from 4 to 1, this cache will be swiftly distributed to more forward depots. Note that the depot at BL has a supply priority of 0 and was emptied last turn. This can be placed back to 4 and refilled over the coming turns.
Employing techniques such as these has left my army supply need at 17,754, while supply delivered was 29,275. In my first game against Vet the numbers were 22,065 and 25,440 respectively, which represents a major improvement in my play from last year. Trucking losses were a mere 1,769 this turn.
T8
Usually by turn 8, the Axis logistics are beginning to strain and the offensive diminishes. In this game I have managed my logistics and marshalled my forces in such a way that a 'fresh' offensive can now be launched from starting positions that are already deep within Russia. This will be a lengthy turn as a result to cover as coordinated assaults are made by AGN, AGC and AGS. Hopefully these will really press the Soviet defences and provide Vet with some difficult decisions.
Realistically I do not expect to take Moscow or even Leningrad against a skilled player in 1941, especially with TBs open. I am coming around to the conclusion that open TBs are a big benefit for the Axis, but the early arrival of an additional 30+ Soviet divisions from the TB means that it is very hard for the Axis to win in '41. Therefore my objectives in this game versus a very able opponent is to force the Russians to give battle, ideally on terrain of my choosing and destroy large parts of the Red Army. This should leave a Red Army of manageable proportions that can be crushed in 1942.
Originally I had little intention to press in the north, but with Vet's abandon the Baltics strategy I find myself thinking about whether I can take Leningrad. However, the weather has turned and the forecast is worse still with rain threatening almost the entire front
While light mud has a bearable impact on fighting strength (usually at around 75% efficiency) what really hurts is the impact on movement. This limits advances (it costs IDs 4 MPs to capture muddy ground, rather than 3 MP) and slows supply replenishment.
Flying NP over the Baltic has preserved my Baltic merchant fleet till now
The rain will make this operation very difficult. Fortunately with 13 operational ships, I am in a position where I can afford to suffer losses from my merchant fleet.
My rail network is coming along nicely and I am beginning to 'pulse' supply forward from intermediate supply stashes.
I have amassed some 60k tons of supply in Warsaw. By dropping supply priority from 4 to 1, this cache will be swiftly distributed to more forward depots. Note that the depot at BL has a supply priority of 0 and was emptied last turn. This can be placed back to 4 and refilled over the coming turns.
Employing techniques such as these has left my army supply need at 17,754, while supply delivered was 29,275. In my first game against Vet the numbers were 22,065 and 25,440 respectively, which represents a major improvement in my play from last year. Trucking losses were a mere 1,769 this turn.
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T8 AGN - Narva crossing attempt
This is a critical turn and with the weather worsening, I must cross the Narva this turn while my troops are rested and the ground firm. I am especially worried about Soviet reserve activations, so I fly interdiction with level bombers in an attempt to hamper these and hit the intended crossing point with GA. As the crossing point is a level 3 fort, the planes are loaded with large bombs.
Well that was a waste of time. I killed the princely sum of 16 Soviet men in the GA and managed a handful of scattered interdiction points. This air attack will have cost a lot of supply but fortunately I have ample around my air bases around Riga.
This is my intended crossing point
The defensive CV of 44 doesn't look too bad. I consider scouting it to validate it but I really don't see much point. I want this hex and will attack it regardless, so I pile in my resources. Interestingly, motorised are more effective at river crossings than foot, according to the manual, but infantry must lead the attack as I want the motorised to make the crossing.
I also assume that engineers are helpful at river crossings, also they'll be helpful in reducing the level 3 fort. Stukas will be flying in support. I also place troops on reserve - I've found that divisions will be activated from reserve as long as they haven't moved. (The manual also suggests that regiments will be activated more readily than divisions but I don't think this makes a material difference).
Anyway, the kitchen sink has been prepared and we're throwing it - crash...
Phew. I nice attack and no Soviet activations (whereas the Axis got one). A decent body count too. We can now move up our armour into the bridgehead ready for the next phase
Vet won't be able to shift that bridgehead with a defensive CV of 75
Note also that we now have a second minor rail line opening up from Riga to Sonda. This should augment the already sound supply in the region.
This is a critical turn and with the weather worsening, I must cross the Narva this turn while my troops are rested and the ground firm. I am especially worried about Soviet reserve activations, so I fly interdiction with level bombers in an attempt to hamper these and hit the intended crossing point with GA. As the crossing point is a level 3 fort, the planes are loaded with large bombs.
Well that was a waste of time. I killed the princely sum of 16 Soviet men in the GA and managed a handful of scattered interdiction points. This air attack will have cost a lot of supply but fortunately I have ample around my air bases around Riga.
This is my intended crossing point
The defensive CV of 44 doesn't look too bad. I consider scouting it to validate it but I really don't see much point. I want this hex and will attack it regardless, so I pile in my resources. Interestingly, motorised are more effective at river crossings than foot, according to the manual, but infantry must lead the attack as I want the motorised to make the crossing.
I also assume that engineers are helpful at river crossings, also they'll be helpful in reducing the level 3 fort. Stukas will be flying in support. I also place troops on reserve - I've found that divisions will be activated from reserve as long as they haven't moved. (The manual also suggests that regiments will be activated more readily than divisions but I don't think this makes a material difference).
Anyway, the kitchen sink has been prepared and we're throwing it - crash...
Phew. I nice attack and no Soviet activations (whereas the Axis got one). A decent body count too. We can now move up our armour into the bridgehead ready for the next phase
Vet won't be able to shift that bridgehead with a defensive CV of 75

Note also that we now have a second minor rail line opening up from Riga to Sonda. This should augment the already sound supply in the region.
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T8 AGN - Luga front
I don't intend to assault the Luga line frontally, hopefully I can subvert it by flanking it. However I want to demonstrate there to ensure that it is fully manned. It takes at least 40 solid divisions to man the Luga line, and at least a further 20 will be now be required around the Narva. I want the Soviets to feel stretched!
Actually the Axis only have limited resources in the area, between the Narva and VL. I only have around 32 divisions. I want Vet to think that I have a major offensive planned though. Fortunately we see an opportunity as there is a block of infantry in open terrain, albeit in a level 2 fort, that we can make vulnerable in front of the main Luga defences. The blue arrows illustrate my troops retiring to open up a desired retreat path
By retreating the Russians we can force them into vulnerable spots. They won't retreat northwards becauce the available hexes are triple stacked, as is we presume is the swamp hex marked with a red cross. Now we can send in the armour to do unpleasant things, ouch
and again, OUCH!
Thus transforming a minor victory into a 35k slaughter
I don't intend to assault the Luga line frontally, hopefully I can subvert it by flanking it. However I want to demonstrate there to ensure that it is fully manned. It takes at least 40 solid divisions to man the Luga line, and at least a further 20 will be now be required around the Narva. I want the Soviets to feel stretched!
Actually the Axis only have limited resources in the area, between the Narva and VL. I only have around 32 divisions. I want Vet to think that I have a major offensive planned though. Fortunately we see an opportunity as there is a block of infantry in open terrain, albeit in a level 2 fort, that we can make vulnerable in front of the main Luga defences. The blue arrows illustrate my troops retiring to open up a desired retreat path
By retreating the Russians we can force them into vulnerable spots. They won't retreat northwards becauce the available hexes are triple stacked, as is we presume is the swamp hex marked with a red cross. Now we can send in the armour to do unpleasant things, ouch
and again, OUCH!
Thus transforming a minor victory into a 35k slaughter
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T8 AGN Cont
I also take out Vet's suicide assassination squad, which I had thankfully isolated last turn
A decent haul though 9k men are minor compensation for the loss of Manstein. We also pick 880 trucks too.
Hopefully we have now made a big enough demonstration on this front so that Vet feels obliged to fully man it. Meanwhile we can suck away resources such as this fresh armour unit to our main thrust on Moscow.
This leaves this front looking like this
Although only a handful of regiments are available to defend the 200 miles of front around VL
Vet is unlikely to be in a position to spare troops to exploit this weakness in a region of little relevance
I also take out Vet's suicide assassination squad, which I had thankfully isolated last turn
A decent haul though 9k men are minor compensation for the loss of Manstein. We also pick 880 trucks too.
Hopefully we have now made a big enough demonstration on this front so that Vet feels obliged to fully man it. Meanwhile we can suck away resources such as this fresh armour unit to our main thrust on Moscow.
This leaves this front looking like this
Although only a handful of regiments are available to defend the 200 miles of front around VL
Vet is unlikely to be in a position to spare troops to exploit this weakness in a region of little relevance
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
AGC
The schwerpunkt is poised aiming for Moscow. We are gradually working our way through the difficult terrain NE of Smolensk and aim to force the Soviet to defend the light terrain between Rzhev and Vyazma. However, our recon indicates some undefended swamps E of Smolensk as the defenders are spread to cover our main thrust.
I can't really believe that this key swamps are undefended. Vet will have learnt from our first game, that I don't like frontal assaults in the obvious places and that I will often make faint attacks to open up softer avenues. However, for this attack, I have the supply and CPP to bludgeon my way through along my existing axis, so I intend to do just that.
We begin by using some of our weaker IDs to clear away the spam blocking units
This is good play by Vet. I could have demolished these units with something stronger but it would have still left a combat delay, instead I am forced to use IDs which cause little damage, perhaps I should have attached a Stug battalion to increase the rout losses?
What do I do about this stack in a forest?
It appears that I might be able to retreat them to a vulnerable hex to the north of where they currently are or I should just isolate them?
After consideration, I decided to isolate them as they weren't really blocking my positions. So my fresh infantry are employed eastwards to clear away the second line of defences
The schwerpunkt is poised aiming for Moscow. We are gradually working our way through the difficult terrain NE of Smolensk and aim to force the Soviet to defend the light terrain between Rzhev and Vyazma. However, our recon indicates some undefended swamps E of Smolensk as the defenders are spread to cover our main thrust.
I can't really believe that this key swamps are undefended. Vet will have learnt from our first game, that I don't like frontal assaults in the obvious places and that I will often make faint attacks to open up softer avenues. However, for this attack, I have the supply and CPP to bludgeon my way through along my existing axis, so I intend to do just that.
We begin by using some of our weaker IDs to clear away the spam blocking units
This is good play by Vet. I could have demolished these units with something stronger but it would have still left a combat delay, instead I am forced to use IDs which cause little damage, perhaps I should have attached a Stug battalion to increase the rout losses?
What do I do about this stack in a forest?
It appears that I might be able to retreat them to a vulnerable hex to the north of where they currently are or I should just isolate them?
After consideration, I decided to isolate them as they weren't really blocking my positions. So my fresh infantry are employed eastwards to clear away the second line of defences
Last edited by jasonbroomer on Fri Jun 16, 2023 10:55 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T8 AGC Cont
Evidently Vet is happy to sacrifice those units in the forest and we can easily get around them
Meanwhile our attacks eastwards continue, not always with success
I am a clot - a panzer division can't taken on two divisions in the open unless they have been retreated. Oh well! Sufficient damage was done to permit a further single attack from a fresh panzer division which was more successful
I couldn't resist this final attack against one of the divisions
Yet it just won't implode. Must be a high moral division!
Evidently Vet is happy to sacrifice those units in the forest and we can easily get around them
Meanwhile our attacks eastwards continue, not always with success
I am a clot - a panzer division can't taken on two divisions in the open unless they have been retreated. Oh well! Sufficient damage was done to permit a further single attack from a fresh panzer division which was more successful
I couldn't resist this final attack against one of the divisions
Yet it just won't implode. Must be a high moral division!
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T8 AGC cont
We finish the turn with much careful placement of troops
By this stage of the game, the Soviets are very capable of launching powerful counter attacks. I doubt that they will be able to address this though!
The supply situation around Gomel is finally being addressed and the arrival of new troops allows the start of a tentative push here. We remain weak here but I want to keep pressure on the Soviets across the entire front.
The presence of a single motorised regiment makes the world of difference to my attacking potential, especially when augmented by the Cv divisions
We finish the turn with much careful placement of troops
By this stage of the game, the Soviets are very capable of launching powerful counter attacks. I doubt that they will be able to address this though!
The supply situation around Gomel is finally being addressed and the arrival of new troops allows the start of a tentative push here. We remain weak here but I want to keep pressure on the Soviets across the entire front.
The presence of a single motorised regiment makes the world of difference to my attacking potential, especially when augmented by the Cv divisions
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T8 AGS
In the south we continue with our push towards Karkov. This blocking Soviet Cv slowed us down by a full 3 Mps before it shattered in front of our fresh panzers
D'town is encircled following some thought to get around the defences. Here care was made not to leave a combat delay on this river crossing point NE of D'town.
The divisions from XXX corps are reassigned to XXXXIV corps ready to assault D'town next turn. I want Vet to think that XXX is preparing for an assault on Kherson
In the south we continue with our push towards Karkov. This blocking Soviet Cv slowed us down by a full 3 Mps before it shattered in front of our fresh panzers
D'town is encircled following some thought to get around the defences. Here care was made not to leave a combat delay on this river crossing point NE of D'town.
The divisions from XXX corps are reassigned to XXXXIV corps ready to assault D'town next turn. I want Vet to think that XXX is preparing for an assault on Kherson
- Attachments
-
- T8 AGS XXX corps divisions reassigned to XXXXIV to keep pretense of Kherson threat alive.png (3.87 MiB) Viewed 2672 times
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T8 AGS cont
This Cossack raid has distracted these Rom divisions from their vital work
Actually it's a bit of a nuisance as Krivvoi Rog was scheduled to be connected to the rail network next turn. Oh well.
The end of turn position
If Vet does not abandon Kiev next turn he will be encircled. We continue to mark time around Kherson with a handful of divisions, hopefully tying up Soviet defences. I know that the Crimea defences will now be strong but hey-ho.
These Italians have been buffed, lifting their moral to 60.
They will still get sent back to their mamas. Their trucks are too useful.
Overall the Soviet losses for the turn were surprisingly modest
We killed more than expected in the north and fewer in the centre. The good news is that we have at least a further 30k isolated
This Cossack raid has distracted these Rom divisions from their vital work

Actually it's a bit of a nuisance as Krivvoi Rog was scheduled to be connected to the rail network next turn. Oh well.
The end of turn position
If Vet does not abandon Kiev next turn he will be encircled. We continue to mark time around Kherson with a handful of divisions, hopefully tying up Soviet defences. I know that the Crimea defences will now be strong but hey-ho.
These Italians have been buffed, lifting their moral to 60.
They will still get sent back to their mamas. Their trucks are too useful.
Overall the Soviet losses for the turn were surprisingly modest
We killed more than expected in the north and fewer in the centre. The good news is that we have at least a further 30k isolated
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
Wow massive update! Glad to see you guys are back at it
Yes, ground attack - unit has been seriously nerfed due to Soviet exploits and is basically an "interdiction but try to cause a few casualties" mission now.
Do you think the Soviets are using some version of the "abandon the south" strategy?

Yes, ground attack - unit has been seriously nerfed due to Soviet exploits and is basically an "interdiction but try to cause a few casualties" mission now.
Do you think the Soviets are using some version of the "abandon the south" strategy?

"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak" - John Adams
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
With several armies based around Kiev and Kherson, I don't see this as an abandon the south strategy. Just sensible play. I was on D'town so quickly that Vet had no chance to delay me especially as I was there in strength. I even got 4 time VP bonuses for the city which is far from usual.
It is pointless trying to defend the open ground in between these two K cities, at best the Soviets can only delay the Axis advance by a few hexes while risking significant causalities.
It is pointless trying to defend the open ground in between these two K cities, at best the Soviets can only delay the Axis advance by a few hexes while risking significant causalities.
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T8 Soviets
A bridgehead has been established across the Narva river with a strong Axis attack. This included 2 reserve activations and many attached SUs. I’ll need to reorientatie my defence accordingly.
Taking some punishing losses from heavy axis attacks on the road to Luga. The first one was poor positioning on my part as I didn’t leave a valid retreat path.
I’ve done a lot of repositioning of units in Leningrad. My Luga line is fairly strong with lvl 3 forts and double/triple stacks. There is 1 hex that’s not heavy forest so I’ve placed some stronger units behind it as if JB continues to advance along this way, that is where he will target. Near the Narva bridgehead I’ve stacked it with units as its good defensive terrain although I have pulled back from the southern tip to avoid a heavy encirclement. I’ll likely need to start building some forts further back for when my current lines are breached. There’s a mountain/heavy forest range not to far back which would be ideal.
A bridgehead has been established across the Narva river with a strong Axis attack. This included 2 reserve activations and many attached SUs. I’ll need to reorientatie my defence accordingly.
Taking some punishing losses from heavy axis attacks on the road to Luga. The first one was poor positioning on my part as I didn’t leave a valid retreat path.
I’ve done a lot of repositioning of units in Leningrad. My Luga line is fairly strong with lvl 3 forts and double/triple stacks. There is 1 hex that’s not heavy forest so I’ve placed some stronger units behind it as if JB continues to advance along this way, that is where he will target. Near the Narva bridgehead I’ve stacked it with units as its good defensive terrain although I have pulled back from the southern tip to avoid a heavy encirclement. I’ll likely need to start building some forts further back for when my current lines are breached. There’s a mountain/heavy forest range not to far back which would be ideal.
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T8 Soviets Cont
There were many ways he could have advanced this turn but he’s chosen to go north east and will likely flank Vyzama from the north next turn. I had a strong triple stacked isolated but I did need a strong point here to try and slow him down. In hindsight I should stacked 2 rather than 3 rifle divisions here though. This sector will need reinforcements as it’s now clear Moscow is a major focus in 41 (potentially to set up for Moscow in 42).
I’m actually grateful he didn’t shift his armies to encircle Kiev. I got a little to greedy and probably should have fallen back last turn to be safe. I’ve got 2 armies in the area so I’ll fall back this turn shifting one further east towards Kharkov. He has advanced very quickly towards Kharkov and whilst I had some reinforcements arrive this turn, I’m still fairly weak in the sector. My screening force at D-town was pushed back and the city will fall next turn.
Centre remains under pressure with both 2nd and 3rd panzer armies pushing towards Moscow (often 1 of them goes south towards Gomel). I’ve shifted units from Veleke further east to slow down the push but this is the last turn I’m on semi decent terrain. Once he pushes through my defence this turn (and he will!), I’ll need to fall back to the Rhzev river line in the north east and potentially east of Vyzama depending on how he moves. I suspect he'll go east/north east from where his panzer ball currently is.
Finally I got my first attack of the game in and I had to target a weak Romanian brigade to achieve it
There were many ways he could have advanced this turn but he’s chosen to go north east and will likely flank Vyzama from the north next turn. I had a strong triple stacked isolated but I did need a strong point here to try and slow him down. In hindsight I should stacked 2 rather than 3 rifle divisions here though. This sector will need reinforcements as it’s now clear Moscow is a major focus in 41 (potentially to set up for Moscow in 42).
I’m actually grateful he didn’t shift his armies to encircle Kiev. I got a little to greedy and probably should have fallen back last turn to be safe. I’ve got 2 armies in the area so I’ll fall back this turn shifting one further east towards Kharkov. He has advanced very quickly towards Kharkov and whilst I had some reinforcements arrive this turn, I’m still fairly weak in the sector. My screening force at D-town was pushed back and the city will fall next turn.
Centre remains under pressure with both 2nd and 3rd panzer armies pushing towards Moscow (often 1 of them goes south towards Gomel). I’ve shifted units from Veleke further east to slow down the push but this is the last turn I’m on semi decent terrain. Once he pushes through my defence this turn (and he will!), I’ll need to fall back to the Rhzev river line in the north east and potentially east of Vyzama depending on how he moves. I suspect he'll go east/north east from where his panzer ball currently is.
Finally I got my first attack of the game in and I had to target a weak Romanian brigade to achieve it
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T9 Logistics
I finally manage to get Minsk connected to the rail system this turn
Normally this is connected by turn 4 but I am happy with the routes taken by the rail repair teams. Supply need has hit 19,770 (with 29,000 tons delivered), only 2,125 trucks were lost too. I am just about managing to supply half of AGN and AGC with a single dual rail line - but it ain't easy. I can't wait to extend this line further east to ease my supply issues.
Frustratingly I lost a cargo ship in the Black Sea despite having complete control of the sea lanes
Once again this is an important turn for the game as stage 2 of Barbarossa picks up momentum. Irritatingly it is once again raining in the northern half of the map, including the Moscow front but we can't do anything about that.
AGN
Vet seems to have withdrawn his lines and refixed his defenses
I think Vet has made a mistake by not defending the highlighted hex. Once a major river ZoC to Zoc has been crossed, there is very little you can do with a unit. This naval brigade can be swiftly dispatched and fresh troops can now get across the Narva and attack. I was always going to take this hex this turn but now I can focus my forces eastwards.
He has also made cavalry probes towards Pskov
Fortunately my handful of regiments screening this area made sure that they got no where near my supply lines. No damage done but it keeps me on my toes.
I finally manage to get Minsk connected to the rail system this turn
Normally this is connected by turn 4 but I am happy with the routes taken by the rail repair teams. Supply need has hit 19,770 (with 29,000 tons delivered), only 2,125 trucks were lost too. I am just about managing to supply half of AGN and AGC with a single dual rail line - but it ain't easy. I can't wait to extend this line further east to ease my supply issues.
Frustratingly I lost a cargo ship in the Black Sea despite having complete control of the sea lanes
Once again this is an important turn for the game as stage 2 of Barbarossa picks up momentum. Irritatingly it is once again raining in the northern half of the map, including the Moscow front but we can't do anything about that.
AGN
Vet seems to have withdrawn his lines and refixed his defenses
I think Vet has made a mistake by not defending the highlighted hex. Once a major river ZoC to Zoc has been crossed, there is very little you can do with a unit. This naval brigade can be swiftly dispatched and fresh troops can now get across the Narva and attack. I was always going to take this hex this turn but now I can focus my forces eastwards.
He has also made cavalry probes towards Pskov
Fortunately my handful of regiments screening this area made sure that they got no where near my supply lines. No damage done but it keeps me on my toes.
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T9 AGN cont
In the event I made just one major attack in the north this turn though. My troops found no opposition when heading NNW from Pskov, which opened up an opportunity
Instead I utilised my mobility to surround the troops manning the eastern banks of the Narva. To my surprise I have managed to link up the two offensive prongs of AGN
Securing a ZOC free passage of the Narva by capturing the red highlighted hex is a real supply boon as it is very truck intensive otherwise. We didn't create many casualties this turn but we have encircled 5 divisions or so and gotten a lot of troops across the Narva. I bring to your attention the high CV of these rested troops - remember some of these hexes have light mud on them.
I am bit worried about the pocket holding, especially the 17 CV defensive panzer. I've fatten it with SUs , thankfully it can be only assaulted from one hex. The adjacent infantry division is also a bit vulnerable but I'm less concerned about that.
In the event I made just one major attack in the north this turn though. My troops found no opposition when heading NNW from Pskov, which opened up an opportunity
Instead I utilised my mobility to surround the troops manning the eastern banks of the Narva. To my surprise I have managed to link up the two offensive prongs of AGN
Securing a ZOC free passage of the Narva by capturing the red highlighted hex is a real supply boon as it is very truck intensive otherwise. We didn't create many casualties this turn but we have encircled 5 divisions or so and gotten a lot of troops across the Narva. I bring to your attention the high CV of these rested troops - remember some of these hexes have light mud on them.
I am bit worried about the pocket holding, especially the 17 CV defensive panzer. I've fatten it with SUs , thankfully it can be only assaulted from one hex. The adjacent infantry division is also a bit vulnerable but I'm less concerned about that.
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: The Rumble in the Tundra, a Vet (Sov) JB (Axis) rematch
T9 AGC
My schwerpunkt is ready and launched. Next stop Moscow (well okay, Rzhev and Vyazma if you must).
Actually, I'm really concerned about my supply lines which must come through Vyazma. I need to gain control of the highlighted the marshes. My hope is to push east and stretch Vet's front and force him to abandon these key hexes. Otherwise I'll have to clear them the hard way. In the meantime I must vigorously defend Smolensk from any counter stroke, my supply lines are worryingly close to the front.
Again I bring your attention to the CV of some of my units. There is light mud in the area but thankfully it is only scattered.
First job is to clear away the spam in the first line with weak units. This is good tactics by Vet as the unavoidable combat delay slows my advance. I also need to clear the isolated 3 IDs. Despite isolation, the defensive CV of 75 deserves respect, so I attack it with overwhelming force to crush resistance.
I decide to advance only modestly while my infantry is rested making the attack. Used properly, assault armies are very good at restoring CPP.
I am acutely aware of my supply limitations in this sector. I will only really begin to advance once the second dual rail line is connected which will happen in the nest turn or two. In the meantime I am happy to make attritional attacks on the Soviets to grind down their defences and maintain my CPP.
Note that the Soviet stack showing a 52 CV is almost surrounded. Vet will be forced to withdraw them, saving me the job of attacking another heavy wood hex. My forward units have now reached the section of open ground, this will be very difficult to defend.
Closer to home, I did manage to find a hex to grab in the marshes east of Smolensk as well.
It would appear that the plan to press towards Moscow is bearing fruit allowing me to pick up difficult ground here cheaply.
My schwerpunkt is ready and launched. Next stop Moscow (well okay, Rzhev and Vyazma if you must).
Actually, I'm really concerned about my supply lines which must come through Vyazma. I need to gain control of the highlighted the marshes. My hope is to push east and stretch Vet's front and force him to abandon these key hexes. Otherwise I'll have to clear them the hard way. In the meantime I must vigorously defend Smolensk from any counter stroke, my supply lines are worryingly close to the front.
Again I bring your attention to the CV of some of my units. There is light mud in the area but thankfully it is only scattered.
First job is to clear away the spam in the first line with weak units. This is good tactics by Vet as the unavoidable combat delay slows my advance. I also need to clear the isolated 3 IDs. Despite isolation, the defensive CV of 75 deserves respect, so I attack it with overwhelming force to crush resistance.
I decide to advance only modestly while my infantry is rested making the attack. Used properly, assault armies are very good at restoring CPP.
I am acutely aware of my supply limitations in this sector. I will only really begin to advance once the second dual rail line is connected which will happen in the nest turn or two. In the meantime I am happy to make attritional attacks on the Soviets to grind down their defences and maintain my CPP.
Note that the Soviet stack showing a 52 CV is almost surrounded. Vet will be forced to withdraw them, saving me the job of attacking another heavy wood hex. My forward units have now reached the section of open ground, this will be very difficult to defend.
Closer to home, I did manage to find a hex to grab in the marshes east of Smolensk as well.
It would appear that the plan to press towards Moscow is bearing fruit allowing me to pick up difficult ground here cheaply.