Fischia il Vento - loki100 vs smokindave34 ... German marginal victory T94

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderator: MOD_WarintheWest

User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

Turn 78: 30 December 1944 – 5 January 194

Post by loki100 »

Turn 78: 30 December 1944 – 5 January 1945

My luck with the weather ran out, return to snowstorms after three weeks of clear skies.

Image

Being used to WiTE, this takes some getting used to. With the Soviets these weather conditions would be time to party and trample all over the German army (esp with the frozen rivers). Here deprived of my aircover its a time to rest and recover.

Supply network is as good as possible, really what matters now is taking and repairing Antwerp.

Image

Very little actual fighting but managed to surround Brussels and Liege. Left all the tactical bombers resting (rebuild morale and limit fuel usage) and did no strategic bombing. Equally, if possible I tried not to move the armoured formations.

Image

Basically, in terms of fuel and ammunition supply to the front line units I’d reached my limits. I was burning off far more than I could deliver so even if the weather hadn’t turned I’d have probably had to scale back the offensive.

User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

Turn 79: 6-12 January 1945

Post by loki100 »

Turn 79: 6-12 January 1945

Weather still dominated by snowfall:

Image

This really limits my airpower but I need to keep some sort of pressure on the Germans.

Supply situation, Brussels and Liege will fall this turn giving me more big depots close to the front, maybe able to encircle Antwerp (which in supply terms is a huge prize)

Image

Leige and Brussels do fall, along with that pocket west of Marche.

Also complete a campaign to reach the Rhine around Belfort, I think I can force the Germans to keep a strong force down here with a minimal commitment for myself. In any case the rail connection at Strasbourg is now the critical focus on this sector.

Image

In the north, in addition to clearing out the pockets, US 1 Army launches a limited offensive south of Aachen. I'd like to reach the open plains behind the Hurtgenwald so that in a clear turn I can really push to the Rhine.

Image

Here's the final position, Antwerp is encircled and my special fort busting XX Corps is in position to attack next turn (it has almost all my very heavy artillery).

Image
jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

RE: Turn 79: 6-12 January 1945

Post by jwolf »

Looks nice; I hope you get Antwerp next turn as you suggested. How is Stalin doing on the other side?
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

RE: Turn 79: 6-12 January 1945

Post by loki100 »

ORIGINAL: jwolf

Looks nice; I hope you get Antwerp next turn as you suggested. How is Stalin doing on the other side?

Aye Antwerp falls next turn, I cunningly left large supplies of Mort Subite where the defenders would find them. As a result they couldn't work out the difference between their hangovers and my heavy artillery so the city fell pretty easily.

Uncle Joe is back on the vodka [8D], well something has meant no progress over there for quite a few turns (I think Dave transferred some units back to the EF box).
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

Turn 80: 13-19 January 1945

Post by loki100 »

Turn 80: 13-19 January 1945

At this stage of the game I'm checking the air weather chart as the very first thing I do. The difference between snowfall (as again this turn) and clear is dramatic in terms of the effectiveness of my airpower.

Image

VP situation seems to have stabilised. I still think its unlikely I'll manage a draw but to be honest I made a mess of the Italian campaign so I can't really complain.

Image

Supply situation. I'm doing ok as I am prioritising a small number of formations for fuel and ammunition. I think I now have a pretty good grasp of the way the on-map depot system and priorities inter-acts with the supply priority you create within your command chain.

Anyway, this turn, Antwerp should be all mine.

Image

Yep.

Image

XX Corps does what it is designed to do.

Elsewhere, some limited attacks, many of which failed. But I do disrupt the German defences north and south of Aachen. If I can, crossing the Rhine while it is frozen remains my priority goal.

Image
jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

RE: Turn 80: 13-19 January 1945

Post by jwolf »

I'm wondering how much longer the Germans can hold a decent line. I keep thinking they're about to crumble completely, but it never seems to happen.
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

RE: Turn 80: 13-19 January 1945

Post by loki100 »

ORIGINAL: jwolf

I'm wondering how much longer the Germans can hold a decent line. I keep thinking they're about to crumble completely, but it never seems to happen.

the problem with the allies is that you can't really overwhelm them as you can with the Soviets at this stage. But its a case of creating more and more crises, forcing the Germans to plug gaps. Even with reduced interdiction due to the weather, there is still quite a cost to be paid every time they need to redeploy.

so it is possible for the Germans to keep recreating a defense but each is that bit weaker and more vulnerable than the last.

also in 1945, German NM tumbles so the infantry become increasingly useless
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

Turn 81: 20-26 January 1945

Post by loki100 »

Turn 81: 20-26 January 1945

Snowfall ... very pretty and all that but I would prefer clear skies:

Image

I've been mentioning the importance of managing supply. Here are two essentially identical units

Image

Note that 2 Canadian has almost all the ammo it needs while 1 Canadian has about 60%.

1 Canadian was in a different corps (one with low supply priority) and you can see the impact on both supply and ammunition levels, and thus on the effective combat value.

The rule book states:
"a unit loses 1 percent for each 1 percent they are short of their ammunition needs. Next motorized units lose 2 percent for each 1 percent they are short of 50 percent of their fuel needs."

So I Canadian has lost about 40% of its notional combat power. Both have enough fuel so that part of the malus doesn't apply. But this is not enough to explain the full reasons for the variation in effective combat value.

Supply shortages also hit indirectly and has an impact on combat efficiency. 1 Canadian has more missing parts to its TOE as its been on a lower supply priority, so has weakened in that respect as well, note that it is much weaker in key parts such as rifle squads.

The wider gain for letting some units run down is I am mostly keeping my armour at near full strength. Do need to pull divisions out of the line to recover and tend to have the equivalent of at least one corps not committed at any stage. The result is being able to exert continuous pressure, even on turns when I don't gain very much.

On the ground, some small scale attacks on the Dutch-Belgian border and a frustrating set of attacks to the north of Aachen. I really mismanaged this as I could have forced the Germans to retreat away from that empty hex.

Image

It then took 3 attacks to dislodge it due to reserve reactions (my idea of starting with an infantry attack on the original target was to use up the German reserves)

Image

Anyway, with the gap finally made, created a large hole in the German defences.

Image

In turn, then made more gains to the south of Aachen.


Image

To try and disrupt the German defences, landed a couple of paratroop regiments well behind the front, I'm hoping this will force a general retreat around Bitburg.

Image

I'm not sure that was such a good idea, but the potential losses are very limited.
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

Turn 82: 27 January – 2 February 1945

Post by loki100 »

Turn 82: 27 January – 2 February 1945

Snowfall continues, so no really effective use of airpower. I decided to set most of the airforce to rest so that it would be available when there are clear skies.

Image

Supply situation, note that that nice huge black line at Antwerp.

Image

On the ground, the Germans pulled out of Aachen, so most of that apparently impressive advance was uncontested. The fighting was limited to battles around Maastricht which is now cut off. That will add nicely to my supply network.

Image

I now think I will be able to gain the east bank of the Rhine before the weather warms up. But that is dependent on a few clear weather turns when I can pound particular targets and generally plaster the area behind a planned attack with high levels of interdiction.

Denmark

I've had US 5 Army sat in UK ports since I withdrew it from the Med in late 1944. Originally it was targetting NE France in the hope of generating a pocket if the Germans tried to hold the Seine too long. I then had the idea of testing out the viability of invading Denmark instead.

My other idea was simply to commit it to the main fighting. Now I hold Antwerp I no longer need to fear a global supply shortage for my forces, merely the regular problem of supply delivery to key formations.

Image

My gamble is that these units have been refitting in the UK for about 4 months, are at full strength and should be able to force their way ashore. Air support is coming from Bomber Command and US 8 Air.

I should have kept to my other (far better) idea.
jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

RE: Turn 82: 27 January – 2 February 1945

Post by jwolf »

I assume (??) even in the best case you won't be able to break out of Denmark to the south with those guys. But it's cool to see a new front opened up.
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

RE: Turn 82: 27 January – 2 February 1945

Post by loki100 »

ORIGINAL: jwolf

I assume (??) even in the best case you won't be able to break out of Denmark to the south with those guys. But it's cool to see a new front opened up.

well I know that Dave is having to send more units east to play with Uncle Joe et al, so to create a decent plug on the Danish-German border would pull another 6-8 divisions away from the main fighting. Probably not much difference on the front lines but its another significant reduction of his ability to pre-prepare new defensive lines by leaving units to the rear to dig in.

Also the VPs for the Danish cities would be nice.

of course this masterplan depends on the initial landings not showing all the planning skills of a lemming when presented with a nice juicy cliff ...[;)]
jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

RE: Turn 82: 27 January – 2 February 1945

Post by jwolf »

ORIGINAL: loki100

of course this masterplan depends on the initial landings not showing all the planning skills of a lemming when presented with a nice juicy cliff ...[;)]

Not an auspicious metaphor -- I hope your fate is better than that!
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

Turn 83: 3 – 9 February 1945

Post by loki100 »

Turn 83: 3 – 9 February 1945

Ok, fans of suspense narratives may be disappointed, as despite all my subtle hints in the last post, the Danish gambit actually was a total disaster. I mean everyone wants to burn off 90 spare victory points for no advantage?

Image

And a few losses, just to rub it in.

Image

Oh, and a particularly jolly email from my opponent ...

Anyway, I decided nothing cheers up an allied player like dropping bombs. Just to help with this therapy, the weather turned clear, and I have a lot of well rested tactical bombers.

Image

A lot ...

Image
(I have stopped most Strategic Bombing – apart from 15 Air – and am using the 4 engined bombers for interdiction behind the lines).

This went a long way to cheering me up ... note I have actually bombed one German unit to 0-0 status.

Image

The inital attack saw US 1 Army reach the Rhine but an attempt to take Cologne off the march failed:

Image

As a bit more therapy, I decided to rout out that Pzr Division as I want to reach and cross the Rhine rather than accept the slowing of my movement due to its zone of control

Image

Anyway, in the end I couldn't actually cross the Rhine, though I have control of a hex on the east bank. I've also redeployed the unused units of US 5 Army to the main front, the damaged ones are in the UK recovering. I've abandoned the successful landing at the north end of Jutland, as I really can't see the advantage to trying to hang on up there.

Image

So lets see if my post-Danish therapy will see me over the Rhine next turn?
jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

RE: Turn 83: 3 – 9 February 1945

Post by jwolf »

Too bad about Denmark. Live and learn. Good luck as you head toward the German heartland.
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7390
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Turn 83: 3 – 9 February 1945

Post by Q-Ball »

What happened exactly in Denmark? I assume the southernmost landing vs. that port was repulsed; landing on a fort is never a good idea, I bet that failed. What happened to the others? Weather? I wouldn't expect a ton of resistance on the beach.
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

RE: Turn 83: 3 – 9 February 1945

Post by loki100 »

ORIGINAL: jwolf

Too bad about Denmark. Live and learn. Good luck as you head toward the German heartland.
ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

What happened exactly in Denmark? I assume the southernmost landing vs. that port was repulsed; landing on a fort is never a good idea, I bet that failed. What happened to the others? Weather? I wouldn't expect a ton of resistance on the beach.

it was all an experiment, as you say the attack on the port was high risk. In a way the whole thing was an experiment - if you use very rested and well supplied troops can you do an invasion in poor weather and/or get away with a direct port attack. If I'd waited a turn (for cold skies) I meant have learnt more as at the least my bombing would have been more effective.

but I think all 3 landings failed so badly that the relative gain/loss for effective bombing wouldn't have rescued the invasion.

so I think that convinces me that you really can't do naval invasions in worse than light rain/light mud, which is handy for the wider planning of the war. In that case, I'd have been better letting 5 Army sit in the UK till my continental supply was ok and then add it to bring more pressure on the main front.

we're a few turns ahead and if I can redeploy, I have a chance of attacking around Frankfurt/Fulda which is actually quite a good way deep into the Reich. But I need lots more units to be able to have both a powerful spearhead and guard my flanks.
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11707
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

Turn 84: 10 February – 16 February 1945

Post by loki100 »

Turn 84: 10 February – 16 February 1945

My weather obsession carries on, snow on the ground and cold skies means lots of bombing.

Here's the supply situation after last turn's gains. As you can see I'm retaining some of the rear depots (to support my airfields) but setting their priority to #1 so that the bulk of the supply goes as close to the front as I can.

Image

Practically, I am really noticing the advantage of Antwerp. Units in my supply priority #3/#4 formations are now fairly well off if I leave them out of combat for a turn.

Bombing is aimed solely at helping me over the Rhine. Its hard to see but in there is a mix of multi-hex interdiction attacks and single hex unit attacks.

Image

And we are over the Rhine ...

Image

And Bonn was captured

Image

So there we are, the gains around Eindhoven were where the Germans fell back. The critical bit is I have a stack of 3 armoured divisions (about 45cv) over the Rhine, given the interdiction levels around there, I don't think the Germans can muster the power to drive me back over the Rhine.

Image
jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

RE: Turn 84: 10 February – 16 February 1945

Post by jwolf »

ORIGINAL: loki100
The critical bit is I have a stack of 3 armoured divisions (about 45cv) over the Rhine, given the interdiction levels around there, I don't think the Germans can muster the power to drive me back over the Rhine.

I hope you're right ... if so, you should be able to spread out from there and force him to fall back across the front. With the Rhine crossed in force that should (??) get rid of the last really strong defensive barrier.
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2240
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Turn 84: 10 February – 16 February 1945

Post by Seminole »

but I think all 3 landings failed so badly that the relative gain/loss for effective bombing wouldn't have rescued the invasion.

Is your intel correct that some of those landings were unopposed, and yet the landings themselves failed because of the snow?

Contending with a Danish Gambit in my game as the Axis (July '44 now).
My opponent (S2Tanker) got at least two weeks unopposed as I didn't realize where the invasion had happened until he showed up almost at the German border!
That region offers some interesting possibilities for counter attack...
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
ivaldi
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 8:00 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Turn 84: 10 February – 16 February 1945

Post by ivaldi »

Very nice AAR.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”