Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Locked
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by mikmykWS »

ORIGINAL: navyrecognition

Happy to report that my install of CMANO works again thanks to the new public realse built.

Two things I would like to report regarding UAE:
1- The change log mentions the addition of a new Abu Dhabi class (this one I guess )But it is still missing from the UAE Surface ship list.
EDIT 18/07/2015, false alarm the vessel class is now showing... not sur what is going on

2- I always found it weird to see a CN-295 MPA for UAE... and I just checked. I can confirm they got some Dash-8 instead.
Wiki entry: The UAE , meanwhile, he was selected and planned to acquire 4 copies by €156.2 million in the year 2001. However, they have not confirmed the order and instead have acquired two Dash-8 Q300MP airplanes in February 2009.
Actual pic of Dash-8 MPA of UAE: http://i.imgur.com/5DvvSlh.jpg

Abu Dhabi is there. Please remember that if you're opening a scenario and then viewing the db viewer it opens the db it was created with. Please check again and make sure you have version 1.08.

Abu
SuaveWatermelon
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:14 am

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by SuaveWatermelon »

F-35 reality check
https://defenseissues.wordpress.com/201 ... ity-check/

Not sure if this could be useful in any ways. It "seems" very technical and the guy "seems" like he knows what he is talking about (I am not Engineer...) but on the other hand, it is quite negative overall.

I'm no expert myself, but I know that Picard has had a long stint of criticizing anything and everything with the F-35 (much like Bill Sweet man; though I don't know Picard's exact identity).

Too many dubious and unqualified statements within the post such as
F-35 also has twice the frontal area, which cancels out its double amount of dry thrust

Seeing as he has not sourced the data to back this claim, this man's credibility is questionable at best (If he were credible, he would source the data for the F-35's frontal area, the equations used to calculate the applicable types of drag, etc).

He also attributed a quote to "Griffiths" without either stating who that is, the source that he retrieved the quote from, or the context in which it was said. Anyone who is worth their salt will do these things.
“What we can do in our airplane is get above the Mach with afterburner, and once you get it going … you can definitely pull the throttle back quite a bit and still maintain supersonic, so technically you’re pretty much at very, very min[imum] afterburner while you’re cruising,” Griffiths said. “So it really does have very good acceleration capabilities up in the air.”

He also cites wing loading as a reason that the F-35 cannot supercruise (he doesn't mention lifting body design).

Some of Picard's other "interesting" statements

http://theaviationist.com/2013/02/11/ty ... al-combat/ (check the comments)

He does not qualify himself or his statements and is therefore not worth yours or anyone else's attention.
SuaveWatermelon
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:14 am

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by SuaveWatermelon »

Also while the F-35 is the subject, not sure if any of you have seen this, but Avweek had an interesting bit about the F-16 and F-35 BFM test
from back in April, not long after the test occurred.
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter has been flown in air-to-air combat maneuvers against F-16s for the first time and, based on the results of these and earlier flight-envelope evaluations, test pilots say the aircraft can be cleared for greater agility as a growth option.

Although the F-35 is designed primarily for attack rather than air combat, U.S. Air Force and Lockheed Martin test pilots say the availability of potential margin for additional maneuverability is a testament to the aircraft’s recently proven overall handling qualities and basic flying performance. “The door is open to provide a little more maneuverability,” says Lockheed Martin F-35 site lead test pilot David “Doc” Nelson.

The operational maneuvers were flown by Nelson in AF-2, the primary Flight Sciences loads and flutter evaluation aircraft, and one of nine F-35s used by the Edwards AFB-based 412th Test Wing for developmental testing (DT).

and
Work is underway as part of efforts to clear the final system development and demonstration (SDD) maneuvering envelopes on the way to initial operational capability (IOC)

and
The operational maneuver tests were conducted to see “how it would look like against an F-16 in the airspace,” says Col. Rod “Trash” Cregier, F-35 program director. “It was an early look at any control laws that may need to be tweaked to enable it to fly better in future. You can definitely tweak it—that’s the option.”

http://aviationweek.com/defense/f-35-fl ... -maneuvers

(To read this article, you need to register. Fortunately this is free (I'm not 100% certain of the stipulations, but that was what I did with no troubles)).

What's important to note is that this was a Developmental test and not an Operational test (which means that this test is not meant to evaluate the operational capabilities of the F-35, but instead to test flight software for potential tweaks, which 'Doc' Nelson says can be done).

I'll see what else I can find, but it's clear that it's too early to tell just how maneuverable the F-35 will be when it hits block 3F or 4.
ckfinite
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:33 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ckfinite »

The S-400 (2013) doesn't have the 9M96 missile in DB439. It's pretty easy to find pictures of a S-400 TEL with the missile, like this one from APA:

Image
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ComDev »


NTC "Zaslon" ( this is former NTC "Leninets" creators of radar stations for Su-34 and Mig-31) show radar complex "Zaslon" for project 20385 and 20386 ships

X-band radar from RLK "Zaslon"
Image



on 20385
Image


on 20386
Image

from video presentation on IMDS-2015:
in RLK "Zaslon included stations of X-band, stations of S-band and datalinks for missiles, range of RLK "Zaslon" is 75km against target with RCS=1 sq.m. , max range of detection for active radio emission target 300km ,the number of tracked targets - more than 100.
This system is capable of producing active jamming in the area of up to 360 degrees in the frequency range of X and Ku.

Looking at photos it seems the Zaslon system isn't installed yet on 2038.5?
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ComDev »

ORIGINAL: Splinter00S

Since I saw that generic light/medium CATOBAR carriers were added to the database, I thoguht that perhaps it could be useful to have generic versions of other aircraft carriers as well, such as:
-heavy CATOBAR carrier (e.g. generic Kitty Hawk class)
-light/medium STOBAR carrier (e.g. generic Liaoning carrier)
-light/medium STOVL carrier (e.g generic Invincible class or generic QE class)
-light/medium LHA/LHD (e.g. generic America class or Wasp class)

Will add if requested by scen designers [8D]
In addition, I noticed there wasn't an entry for the Laser Weapon System, and since it has been sucessfully tested and is currently deployed on USS Ponce I thought it could make a good addition as a hypothetical CIWS system.
I can't post links but the Office of Navel Research, NAVSEA, and several other military news websites have articles about the LAWS (30kW solid state laser) and it's deployment on the USS Ponce (currently has shot down a ScanEagle UAV, destroyed several boats, and potentially has the accuracy to target individual people/weapons on a boat).

It's in there already:

AN/SEQ-3 (SC-1) LaWS Laser Weapon System
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ComDev »

ORIGINAL: 1Eddie2
The RAF C-130J upgrade will be considered substantial enough for it to be named Hercules C6 (it is current C5). Nine have been fitted with external fuel tanks for extended range and are likely for special forces use.

Thanks Eddie. Do you have more info on the capacity of those fuel tanks?
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ComDev »

Sweet, thanks! [:D]

Any photos of the boats with the system installed?

ORIGINAL: SASR

The SEWIP BLock 2 Will be the AN/SLQ-32(V)6. There is a small RCS version of SEWIP Block 2 being fitted onto the LCSs called the AN/SLQ-32C(V)6

From : janes / com / article /4 3 8 9 2 / sewip-block- 2 -set-for-at-sea-operational-test

"According to the company, the DDG 51 Arleigh Burke-class Flight IIA guided-missile destroyer USS Bainbridge received the SEWIP Block 2 system in July for operational testing. The Block 2 implementation has received the in-service designation AN/SLQ-32(V)6."

- janes / com / article /4 7 8 3 7 / surface-navy- 2015 -sewip-lite-set-for-lcs

"The US Navy (USN) is concluding an evaluation of a scaled-down version of Lockheed Martin's AN/SLQ-32(V)6 electronic warfare (EW) system - developed under the Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP) Block 2 upgrade - on board the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) USS Freedom (LCS 1).

Designated AN/SLQ-32C(V)6, the so-called 'SEWIP Lite' system was installed on board Freedom last year following an accelerated development programme executed by Lockheed Martin Mission Systems and Training in partnership with the USN. Plans are now being drawn up to introduce the small radar cross section (RCS) AN/SLQ-32C(V)6 to both LCS variants as a fleetwide fit."
Designated AN/SLQ-32C(V)6, the so-called 'SEWIP Lite' system was installed on board Freedom last year following an accelerated development programme executed by Lockheed Martin Mission Systems and Training in partnership with the USN. Plans are now being drawn up to introduce the small radar cross section (RCS) AN/SLQ-32C(V)6 to both LCS variants as a fleetwide fit."
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ComDev »

But is the S-400 operational with the 9M96M missile? Don't think it is, yet. Or?

ORIGINAL: ckfinite

The S-400 (2013) doesn't have the 9M96 missile in DB439. It's pretty easy to find pictures of a S-400 TEL with the missile, like this one from APA:

Image
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ComDev »

BIG BUMP! [:D]

BIG BUMP!

BIG BUMP!

What was the deal with the North Korean SSB submarine reported earlier this year? Does it exist, or was it just propaganda?

Thanks!
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
Triode
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 4:18 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Triode »

ORIGINAL: emsoy


Looking at photos it seems the Zaslon system isn't installed yet on 2038.5?

No, radar will be installed after ship hiting water
here is Gremyashiy from 29.01.2015
http://files.balancer.ru/forums/attache ... trojki.jpg

2038.5 currently in not very good situation, this ship should have engines from MTU, but sanction ...
so, OSK say they could change MTU engines for Kolomna (the same as on 20380) without change in date of delivery
(wich is doubtful since they already missing planned launching in 2014) and currently decided that there will be only two of 20385

still Navy dont like 20380 and here came 20386:
Image

citation:
"Within the framework of the International Maritime Defense Show IMDS-2015 in St. Petersburg "Lenta.ru" managed to get an exclusive interview with the chief of department state defense order the United Shipbuilding Corporation Anatoly Shlemov, who spoke about the future projects of ships and submarines for the Russian Navy.

-Let's talk about for last corvettes. A lot of models ...

-What kind of models?

-At the stands.

-We have a serial type corvette - 20380 build four units, two more are under construction. It was decided to build two Project 20385 corvette, and to further develop the project 20386."
http://lenta.ru/articles/2015/07/03/shlemov/ in russian

so there will be only two 20385 (in some unknown time when problems with engines will be resolwed) and then 20386
Triode
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 4:18 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Triode »

ORIGINAL: emsoy

But is the S-400 operational with the 9M96M missile? Don't think it is, yet. Or?



At start of S-400 development it was plan of using 9M96 in it,
than this plans turn into separate S-350 program
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ComDev »

Thanks Triode [8D] So need to wait a little with the Zaslon radar then.

And the S-400 answer was... no?
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
Triode
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 4:18 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Triode »

No, S-400 dont use 9m96 (capable, tested with it, but don't procured in this configuration)
only S-350 use 9m96 (more precisely 9m96D/9m96E2)
MrGandi
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 1:56 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by MrGandi »

Hello emsoy,

Thank you for pointing out to place questions regarding DB questions here.
Not sure how often you did this already to us[:'(]

When I use the MQ-1C it has same 360 degree radar range as the E-3C at same altitude. So way over 40+km.
Please see screenshot attached.
Attachments
Screenshot1.jpg
Screenshot1.jpg (404.64 KiB) Viewed 707 times
MrGandi
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 1:56 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by MrGandi »

Sorry guys taking back my MQ-1c issue.

Had first older DB build.
After updating to the newest build the issue remained.
However when I ad again a MQ-1C to the scenrio the radar range looks right now.



ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ComDev »

ORIGINAL: Triode

No, S-400 dont use 9m96 (capable, tested with it, but don't procured in this configuration)
only S-350 use 9m96 (more precisely 9m96D/9m96E2)

Thanks! [8D]
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
ComDev
Posts: 3116
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 1:20 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by ComDev »

....aaand BUMP!

ORIGINAL: emsoy

BIG BUMP! [:D]

BIG BUMP!

BIG BUMP!

What was the deal with the North Korean SSB submarine reported earlier this year? Does it exist, or was it just propaganda?

Thanks!
Image

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
Coiler12
Posts: 1268
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 10:11 pm
Contact:

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by Coiler12 »

ORIGINAL: emsoy

....aaand BUMP!

ORIGINAL: emsoy

BIG BUMP! [:D]

BIG BUMP!

BIG BUMP!

What was the deal with the North Korean SSB submarine reported earlier this year? Does it exist, or was it just propaganda?

Thanks!

Found this aggregation of pieces on it (and SLBMs in general)

-Apparently, the missile exists, but the submarine (much less its operational status) is far more dubious.
EDIT: 38-North says the submarine is still being built, just that it's not integrated with the missile yet.
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by mikmykWS »

I'd just close for now. Not enough data.

Mike
Locked

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”