Name this #2

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Name this #2

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: JWE

And here's one for uncle rtrapasso, with sails up.


Image
[&o] [&o]
whippleofd
Posts: 617
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 1:40 am

RE: Name this #2

Post by whippleofd »

I'm currently building the Revell 1/96 USS Constitutuion. It's a mighty fine kit, but the molds are old and it will take time to build it correctly. I've been working on it for 2 months now, and it's comming along very nicely.

Whipple
MMCS(SW/AW) 1981-2001
1981 RTC, SD
81-82 NPS, Orlando
82-85 NPTU, Idaho Falls
85-90 USS Truxtun (CGN-35)
90-93 USS George Washington (CVN-73)
93-96 NFAS Orlando
96-01 Navsea-08/Naval Reactors
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Name this #2

Post by Mynok »

ORIGINAL: JWE

ORIGINAL: Mynok

Of all time?!?! No way metal beasts are better looking than a tall ship.
I like the oldies too, but I always thought the liners were too thick in the middle and matronly looking; kinda like a mother-in-law.

I like these better; lean mean sailing machines.


Image

Nice pic! Yeah, I like the frigates a little better too for sleekness. But those old SOLs have a grandeur all their own.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Name this #2

Post by Shark7 »

The only real problem with the Ships of the Line is the fact that they are huge. One has to think it makes them a bit easier to hit, especially considering the ballistics technology of the time. Bigger isn't necessarily better you know. [:D]
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
bradfordkay
Posts: 8591
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Name this #2

Post by bradfordkay »

It is my belief that there have probably been fewer sights more inspiring than that of a formation of Ships of the Line at sail. Unfortunately I will never know if that sight will be so grand in reality as it is in my imagination...

For pure beauty, the frigates of the Nelsonian era can't be beat. I'm a fan of the "Yankee Racehorse", myself... which I believe is the ship in that painting.
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
Charbroiled
Posts: 1181
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:50 pm
Location: Oregon

RE: Name this #2

Post by Charbroiled »

ORIGINAL: Whipple

I'm currently building the Revell 1/96 USS Constitutuion. It's a mighty fine kit, but the molds are old and it will take time to build it correctly. I've been working on it for 2 months now, and it's comming along very nicely.

Whipple

I've been working on mine for 16 years. I started on it before the birth of my daughter. After she was born, I decided that model ships and little kids do not go well together. I had to put it up until I could work on it without it being destroyed. My daughter is 15 now, so maybe I can pull it back out and finish it now.

ps. Dust is not a model's friend.[:(]
"When I said I would run, I meant 'away' ". - Orange
User avatar
jerrylt2008
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 5:36 pm

RE: Name this #2

Post by jerrylt2008 »

SOL are the cream of the crop, especially the Nelsonian designs. The other european powers SOL were all show with fancy trimming but with low caliber crews.

I am currently building a CC HMS Victory, 1 year and almost finished with Hull. Very time consuming but so much pleasure to see something come to life of your own 2 hands.
"One tin soldier rides away........."
User avatar
AW1Steve
Posts: 14525
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:32 am
Location: Mordor aka Illlinois

RE: Name this #2

Post by AW1Steve »

ORIGINAL: Charbroiled

ORIGINAL: Whipple

I'm currently building the Revell 1/96 USS Constitutuion. It's a mighty fine kit, but the molds are old and it will take time to build it correctly. I've been working on it for 2 months now, and it's comming along very nicely.

Whipple

I've been working on mine for 16 years. I started on it before the birth of my daughter. After she was born, I decided that model ships and little kids do not go well together. I had to put it up until I could work on it without it being destroyed. My daughter is 15 now, so maybe I can pull it back out and finish it now.

ps. Dust is not a model's friend.[:(]

When I was first married , I was building USS United States , same scale. I had finished the hull, crossed the yards , and was trying to work up the courage to start rigging her. It sat , almost complete , on the mantle , when my (then) new wife accidently knocked it to the floor, destroying it beyond repair. I was secretly relieved , but my wife felt (unknown to me) very,very guilty. Last year , when getting to move cross country , I broke a ceramic sheep that she was quite fond of. Instead of sadness or anger , she said "good!, Now we are even , I don't have to feel guilty about that damned boat!". She broke it in 1981! [:D]
User avatar
hawker
Posts: 849
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Split,Croatia

RE: Name this #2

Post by hawker »

This is nice tall ship,



Image
Attachments
doc827c8eb1.jpg
doc827c8eb1.jpg (47.84 KiB) Viewed 181 times
Image
Fortess fortuna iuvat
whippleofd
Posts: 617
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 1:40 am

RE: Name this #2

Post by whippleofd »

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

ORIGINAL: Charbroiled

ORIGINAL: Whipple

I'm currently building the Revell 1/96 USS Constitutuion. It's a mighty fine kit, but the molds are old and it will take time to build it correctly. I've been working on it for 2 months now, and it's comming along very nicely.

Whipple

I've been working on mine for 16 years. I started on it before the birth of my daughter. After she was born, I decided that model ships and little kids do not go well together. I had to put it up until I could work on it without it being destroyed. My daughter is 15 now, so maybe I can pull it back out and finish it now.

ps. Dust is not a model's friend.[:(]

When I was first married , I was building USS United States , same scale. I had finished the hull, crossed the yards , and was trying to work up the courage to start rigging her. It sat , almost complete , on the mantle , when my (then) new wife accidently knocked it to the floor, destroying it beyond repair. I was secretly relieved , but my wife felt (unknown to me) very,very guilty. Last year , when getting to move cross country , I broke a ceramic sheep that she was quite fond of. Instead of sadness or anger , she said "good!, Now we are even , I don't have to feel guilty about that damned boat!". She broke it in 1981! [:D]

Did you tell her it was a ship and not a boat, and that after so many years being married to a sailor, she should know that? [:D]

Whipple
MMCS(SW/AW) 1981-2001
1981 RTC, SD
81-82 NPS, Orlando
82-85 NPTU, Idaho Falls
85-90 USS Truxtun (CGN-35)
90-93 USS George Washington (CVN-73)
93-96 NFAS Orlando
96-01 Navsea-08/Naval Reactors
whippleofd
Posts: 617
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 1:40 am

RE: Name this #2

Post by whippleofd »

ORIGINAL: Charbroiled

ORIGINAL: Whipple

I'm currently building the Revell 1/96 USS Constitutuion. It's a mighty fine kit, but the molds are old and it will take time to build it correctly. I've been working on it for 2 months now, and it's comming along very nicely.

Whipple

I've been working on mine for 16 years. I started on it before the birth of my daughter. After she was born, I decided that model ships and little kids do not go well together. I had to put it up until I could work on it without it being destroyed. My daughter is 15 now, so maybe I can pull it back out and finish it now.

ps. Dust is not a model's friend.[:(]

Aye, this is true. My youngest managed to destroy my 1/350 USS Enterprise back in '86 when I unthinkingly sat it on the coffee table for some reason that eludes me now.

I wasn't mad at her in the least. But never the less I had to step out of the house for a couple of hours.

I took a break from plastic modeling until starting the USS Constitution. Just didn't have the heart to do it anymore after that Sink-ex (as it became known, gotta love a Navy wifes sense of humor).

I have found that plastic friendly "super glue" works wonders for model assembly now.

Whipple
MMCS(SW/AW) 1981-2001
1981 RTC, SD
81-82 NPS, Orlando
82-85 NPTU, Idaho Falls
85-90 USS Truxtun (CGN-35)
90-93 USS George Washington (CVN-73)
93-96 NFAS Orlando
96-01 Navsea-08/Naval Reactors
User avatar
RevRick
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Thomasville, GA

RE: Name this #2

Post by RevRick »

How about this one?

Image
Attachments
8sails.jpg
8sails.jpg (80.38 KiB) Viewed 181 times
"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Name this #2

Post by Mynok »


A beauty! [&o]
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
AW1Steve
Posts: 14525
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:32 am
Location: Mordor aka Illlinois

RE: Name this #2

Post by AW1Steve »

ORIGINAL: Whipple

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

ORIGINAL: Charbroiled




I've been working on mine for 16 years. I started on it before the birth of my daughter. After she was born, I decided that model ships and little kids do not go well together. I had to put it up until I could work on it without it being destroyed. My daughter is 15 now, so maybe I can pull it back out and finish it now.

ps. Dust is not a model's friend.[:(]

When I was first married , I was building USS United States , same scale. I had finished the hull, crossed the yards , and was trying to work up the courage to start rigging her. It sat , almost complete , on the mantle , when my (then) new wife accidently knocked it to the floor, destroying it beyond repair. I was secretly relieved , but my wife felt (unknown to me) very,very guilty. Last year , when getting to move cross country , I broke a ceramic sheep that she was quite fond of. Instead of sadness or anger , she said "good!, Now we are even , I don't have to feel guilty about that damned boat!". She broke it in 1981! [:D]

Did you tell her it was a ship and not a boat, and that after so many years being married to a sailor, she should know that? [:D]

Whipple

That's the embarrasing part. Not only was she married to a sailor, (I've been retired for nearly 10 years) , she herself is a sailor , coming up on 19 years. And she's served on three ship's where I've only been TAD'ed to one (The Consituition! And we never left the pier in Boston!) What do you expect from a JAG![:D]
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: Name this #2

Post by JWE »

ORIGINAL: RevRick

How about this one?

Image
Oh yes!! Thanks for that pic Rev.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”