ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
I still use Outlook 2003. 16 bit maybe? Works fine with 64 bit OS.
I am a dinosaur as well as a moose, yes.
I still use Office 2000 and Windows XP. If it ain't broke...
Everything post Windows 3.1 is at least 32 bit.
Bill
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
I still use Outlook 2003. 16 bit maybe? Works fine with 64 bit OS.
I am a dinosaur as well as a moose, yes.
I know. Me too. I've been on XP since forever. But this was a hardware offer I could not refuse. And running AutoCAD at 2.8GHz, 64 bit, with 8G memory, is sooo sweet.ORIGINAL: wdolson
I still use Office 2000 and Windows XP. If it ain't broke...
Everything post Windows 3.1 is at least 32 bit.
Bill
Post by JocMeister »
ORIGINAL: witpqs
If you two guys are using Office 2000 then you are obviously not really tied to MS Office. When you do upgrade, instead of paying for any version of MS Office switch to Libre Office. It's the successor to Open Office, BTW. You're unlikely to find anything that you want to do that will be in MS Office but not in Libre Office. It's to the point where I just ignore the 'free' sub-sets of MS Office that come with a computer and go right with Libre Office.
ORIGINAL: Symon
Just got some new toys for the office. Op system is Windows 7. Doesn’t come with email anymore (wtfo??), so either have to sign up for Windows Essentials (that will be a cold day) or get an after-market client. Any Windows 7 people out there that can point me to a good email client for this beast? Thanks. JWE
ORIGINAL: wdolson
I started using Thunderbird's ancient ancestor in 1995, Netscape Mail 1.0 Beta. I've been using it ever since. My current mail setup is descended from that first e-mail database, created when I first installed all those many years ago. I just found a joke sent 11/10/95 (just about everything else that old was deleted long ago).
The hardware has changed many times, so has the OS. I don't know how many times I've cloned it to a new hard drive. But it keeps going. 18 years now.
If there are some features you want with Thunderbird that aren't in the basic package, there is a huge base of add-ons out there you can tap. Mozilla maintains a database of ones that have been tested and shown to work well with others.
So I'd strongly recommend Thunderbird.
Bill
Hi Leo. I got Thunderbird. Good install. Working well. Recomended by lots of people, but your recommendation (for your work) just puts the raisins on the pudding.ORIGINAL: Apollo11
Hi all,
I use ThunderBird by Mozilla for years both at home and at work (all my users on my system at work use it as well - it is mandatory [;)])!
Leo "Apollo11"
Post by USSAmerica »
ORIGINAL: ncdawg
I use Thunderbird (by the Mozilla guys). It doesn't have all the bells & whistles that Outlook has; however, it also is not a giant resource hog like Outlook.
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/
ORIGINAL: Symon
ORIGINAL: Apollo11
I use ThunderBird by Mozilla for years both at home and at work (all my users on my system at work use it as well - it is mandatory [;)])!
Hi Leo. I got Thunderbird. Good install. Working well. Recomended by lots of people, but your recommendation (for your work) just puts the raisins on the pudding.
Thanks Leo. Ciao. John
Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”